Behandlung der Belastungsinkontinenz nach radikaler Prostatektomie

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：PD Dr. M.R. Hoda (1)
  G. Primus (2)
  A. Schumann (1)
  K. Fischereder (2)
  B. von Heyden (3)
  N. Schmid (4)
  V. Moll (5)
  A. Hamza (6)
  J.J. Karsch (7)
  F. Steinbach (8)
  C. Br?ssner (9)
  W. Bauer (9)
  P. Fornara (1)
  
• 关键词：Belastungsinkontinenz ; Prostatektomie ; Adjustierbare Schlinge ; Adjustierbares transobturatorisches M?nnersystem ; Stress urinary incontinence ; Prostatectomy ; Adjustable slings ; Adjustable transobturator system
• 刊名：Der Urologe A
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：November 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：51
• 期：11
• 页码：1576-1583
• 参考文献：1. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W et al (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985-96 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.020">CrossRef
  2. Bauer W, Karik M, Schramek P (2005) The self-anchoring transobturator male sling to treat stress urinary incontinence in men: a new sling, a surgical approach and anatomical findings in a cadaveric study. BJU Int 95:1364-366 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05530.x">CrossRef
  3. Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol 56:928-33 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.028">CrossRef
  4. Carmel M, Hage B, Hanna S et al (2010) Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1012-016 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09207.x">CrossRef
  5. Comiter CV (2010) Male incontinence surgery in the 21st century: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Urol 20:302-08 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328339b795">CrossRef
  6. Comiter CV (2005) The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results. Neurourol Urodyn 24:648-53 p://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20166">CrossRef
  7. Dalpiaz O, Knopf HJ, Orth S et al (2011) Mid-term complications after placement of the male adjustable suburethral sling: a single center experience. J Urol 186:604-09 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.131">CrossRef
  8. Fassi-Fehri H, Badet L, Cherass A et al (2007) Efficacy of the InVance male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51:498-03 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.042">CrossRef
  9. Fischer MC, Huckabay C, Nitti VW (2007) The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J Urol 177:1414-418 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.061">CrossRef
  10. Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755-758 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65668-6">CrossRef
  11. Giberti C, Gallo F, Schenone M et al (2009) The bone anchor suburethralsynthetic slingfor iatrogenicmale incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup. J Urol 181:2204-208 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.022">CrossRef
  12. Grise P, Geraud M, Geraud M et al (2009) Transobturator male sling TOMS for the treatment of stress post-prostatectomy incontinence, initial experience and results with one year’s experience. Int Braz J Urol 35:706-13 p://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382009000600009">CrossRef
  13. Guimaraes M, Oliveira R, Pinto R et al (2009) Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. BJU Int 103:500-04 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08067.x">CrossRef
  14. Herschorn S, Bruschini H, Comiter C et al (2010) Committee of the International Consultation on Incontinence. Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in men. Neurourol Urodyn 29:179-90 p://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20844">CrossRef
  15. Hubner WA, Schlarp OM (2005) Treatment of incontinence after prostatectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int 96:587-94 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05689.x">CrossRef
  16. HübnerWA, Gallistl H, RutkowskiM, Huber ER (2011) Adjustable bulbourethralmale sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 107:777-82 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09619.x">CrossRef
  17. Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S et al (2008) Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol 179:1912-916 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.048">CrossRef
  18. Kocjancic E, Crivellaro S, Ranzoni S et al (2007) Adjustable continence therapy for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-centre study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41:324-28 p://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365590601153488">CrossRef
  19. Kumar A, Rosenberg Litt E, Ballert KN, Nitti VW (2009) Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence—what do patients choose? J Urol 181:1231-235 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.022">CrossRef
  20. Lebret T, Cour F, Benchetrit J et al (2008) Treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon device, ProACT: results of a preliminary, multicenter, pilot study. Urology 71:256-60 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.062">CrossRef
  21. Leruth J, Waltregny D, Leval J de (2012) The inside-out transobturator male sling for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: midterm results of a single-center prospective study. Eur Urol 61:608-15 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.036">CrossRef
  22. Rajpurkar AD, Onur R, Singla A (2005) Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal bone-anchored male sling. Eur Urol 47:237-42 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.06.021">CrossRef
  23. Romano SV, Metrebian SE, Vaz F et al (2006) An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial. BJU Int 97:533-39 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x">CrossRef
  24. Rouprêt M, Misra? V, Gosseine PN et al (2011) Management of stress urinary incontinence following prostate surgery with minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon implants: functional results from a single center prospective study. J Urol 186:198-03 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.016">CrossRef
  25. Shamliyan TA, Wyman JF, Ping R et al (2009) Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions. Rev Urol 11:145-65
  26. Schaeffer AJ, Clemens JQ, Ferrari M, Stamey TA (1998) The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 159:1510-515 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199805000-00026">CrossRef
  27. Sousa-Escandón A, Cabrera J, Mantovani F et al (2007) Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 52:1473-479 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.017">CrossRef
  28. Stern JA, Clemens JQ, Tiplitsky SI et al (2005) Long-term results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 173:1654-656 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000157972.11229.4e">CrossRef
  29. Ullrich NF, Comiter CV (2004) The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: 24-month followup with questionnaire based assessment. J Urol 172:207-09 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000128652.99627.14">CrossRef
  30. Xu YM, Zhang XR, Sa YL et al (2007) Bulbourethral composite suspension for treatment of male-acquired urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51:1709-714 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.031">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：PD Dr. M.R. Hoda (1)
  G. Primus (2)
  A. Schumann (1)
  K. Fischereder (2)
  B. von Heyden (3)
  N. Schmid (4)
  V. Moll (5)
  A. Hamza (6)
  J.J. Karsch (7)
  F. Steinbach (8)
  C. Br?ssner (9)
  W. Bauer (9)
  P. Fornara (1)
  
  1. Klinik für Urologie und Nierentransplantation, Martin Luther-Universit?t Halle, Ernst-Grube-Stra?e 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
  2. Universit?tsklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universit?t Graz, Graz, ?sterreich
  3. Urologische Klinik, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, Bad Friedrichshall, Deutschland
  4. Urologische Klinik, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, ?sterreich
  5. Diako-Die Stadtklinik, Augsburg, Deutschland
  6. Urologische Klinik, St. Georg Krankenhaus, Leipzig, Deutschland
  7. Urologische Klinik, Loretto Krankenhaus, Freiburg, Deutschland
  8. Urologische Klinik, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Deutschland
  9. Urologische Klinik, Krankenhaus G?ttlicher Heiland, Wien, ?sterreich
  
• ISSN：1433-0563

文摘

Background The adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS?) is a new method for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. This article presents the results of a prospective multicenter observational study with this system. Patients and methods Between March 2009 and March 2011 a total of 124 patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy received the ATOMS system. Postoperative adjustments via the implanted port chamber were performed after 6 weeks and thereafter when necessary. Postoperative evaluation consisted of medical history, mictionary protocol, 24-h pad tests, 24-h pad counts and sonography. Results The mean age of the patients was 71.2±5.5 years (range 58-85 years). Previous incontinence surgery had been carried out in 36.3% of patients while 34.5% of patients had a previous history of radiation treatment. The mean operation time was 48.3±11.2?min (range 36-116?min) and the mean hospital stay was 3.8±1.2 days (range 2-6 days). No intraoperative urethral or bladder injuries occurred. After removal of the transurethral catheter on the first postoperative day, temporary urinary retention occurred in 3 patients who were conservatively treated. Transient perineal/scrotal pain or dysesthesia was observed in 75 patients (60.5%) and resolved after 3-4 weeks of non-opioid analgesics. There were no perineal infections; however, infections at the port site occurred in 3 patients (2.4%) leading to explantation of the system in all cases. The average number of adjustments to achieve the desired result was 4.3±1.8 (range 2-7). After a mean follow-up of 19.1±2.2 months (range 12-36 months), there was a significant reduction in the mean number of pads/24?h from 8.8 to 1.8 (p<0.001). The overall success rate was 93.8% with 61.6% of the patients being dry and 32.2% of the patients showing improvement. Conclusions The results of the study demonstrate the safety and efficacy to date of the ATOMS system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.