Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Christopher Springer (1)
  Antonino Inferrera (1)
  Felix Kawan (1)
  André Schumann (1)
  Paolo Fornara (1)
  Francesco Greco (1)
  
• 关键词：Laparoendoscopic single ; site surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Outcomes ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Risk factors
• 刊名：World Journal of Urology
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：February 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：31
• 期：1
• 页码：213-218
• 全文大小：177KB
• 参考文献：1. Greco F, Hoda MR, Wagner S et al (2010) Adipocytokine: a new family of inflammatory and immunological markers of invasiveness in major urologic surgery. Eur Urol 58:781-87 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.022">CrossRef
  2. Fornara P, Doehn C, Seyfarth M, Jocham D (2000) Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive? Eur Urol 37:241-50 p://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000052351">CrossRef
  3. Soble JJ, Gill IS (1998) Needlescopic urology: incorporating 2-mm instruments in laparoscopic surgery. Urology 52:187-94 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00234-9">CrossRef
  4. Branco AW, Branco Filho AJ, Kondo W et al (2008) Hybrid transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol 53:1290-294 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.053">CrossRef
  5. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Ragavan N et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. World J Urol 30(5):589-96 p://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0765-1">CrossRef
  6. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2009) Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 55:1198-206 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.019">CrossRef
  7. Rane A, Cindolo L, Schips L, De Sio M, Autorino R (2012) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) adrenalectomy: technique and outcomes. World J Urol 30(5):597-04 p://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0678-z">CrossRef
  8. Greco F, Cindolo L, Autorino R, Micali S, Stein RJ, Bianchi G, Canizza C, Schips L, Fornara P, Kaouk J (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site upper urinary tract surgery: standardized assessment of postoperative complications and analysis of risk factors. Eur Urol 61:510-16 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.032">CrossRef
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205-13 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae">CrossRef
  10. Mak PH, Campbell RC (2002) Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care 30:633-40
  11. Greco F, Veneziano D, Wagner S, Kawan F, Mohammed N, Hoda MR, Fornara P (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for renal cancer: technique and surgical outcome. Eur Urol 62:168-74 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.002">CrossRef
  12. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844-53 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035">CrossRef
  13. Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 59:26-5 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.030">CrossRef
  14. Greco F, Hoda MR, Mohammed N, Springer C, Fischer K, Fornara P (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy result in an equivalent surgical trauma: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective controlled study. Eur Urol 61(5):1048-053 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.043">CrossRef
  15. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M et al (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95-01 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023">CrossRef
  16. Kang N, Zhang JH, Niu YN et al (2012) Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of retrocaval ureter. World J Urol. doi:pan class="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1007/s00345-012-0965-3
  17. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M et al (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54:1020-029 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.009">CrossRef
  18. Gettman M, White WM, Aron M et al (2011) Where do we really stand with LESS and NOTES? Eur Urol 59:231-34 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.016">CrossRef
  19. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60(5):998-005 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.002">CrossRef
  20. Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH (2010) Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 24:997-003 p://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0554">CrossRef
  21. Matin SF, Abreu S, Ramani A et al (2003) Evaluation of age and comorbidity as risk factors after laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 170:1115-120 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000086091.64755.ac">CrossRef
  22. Varkarakis I, Chatzidarellis EP, Deliveliotis C (2010) High-risk laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Endourol 24:1219-228 p://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0484">CrossRef
  23. Chiu AW, Chang LS, Birkett DH et al (1995) The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneunoretroperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics. J Am Coll Surg 181:397-06
  24. Gabr AH, Elsayed ER, Gdor Y, Roberts WW, Wolf JS (2008) Obesity and morbid obesity are associated with a greater conversion rate to open surgery for standard but not hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 180:2357-362 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.077">CrossRef
  25. Curet M (2000) Special problems in laparoscopic surgery: previous abdominal surgery, obesity and pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 80:1093-110 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70215-2">CrossRef
  26. Autorino R, Kaouk J, Stolzenburg JU et al (2012) Current status and future direction of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol. doi:pan class="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028
  27. Irwin BH, Cadeddu JA, Tracy CR et al (2011) Complications and conversions of upper tract urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS): multicentre experience: results from the NOTES Working Group. BJU Int 107:1284-289 p://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09663.x">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Christopher Springer (1)
  Antonino Inferrera (1)
  Felix Kawan (1)
  André Schumann (1)
  Paolo Fornara (1)
  Francesco Greco (1)
  
  1. Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin-Luther-University, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, 06120, Halle, Saale, Germany
  
• ISSN：1433-8726

文摘

Objective Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) represents an evolution of laparoscopy for the treatment for urologic diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of LESS in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery undergoing radical nephrectomy (LESS-RN) for renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods A total of 25 patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery who underwent LESS-RN were compared to 31 patients with the same characteristics after conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). LRN was performed between January 2009 and May 2010, and LESS-RNs were performed between June 2010 and November 2011. Demographic data and perioperative and postoperative variables were recorded and analysed. Results The mean ASA score in the LESS-RN and LRN groups was 3.2?±?0.4, and the mean BMI was 32.7?±?2.1 and 34.2?±?0.8?kg/m2, respectively. The mean operative time in the LESS-RN and LRN groups was 143.7?±?24.3 and 130.6?±?26.5?min, (p?=?0.11), and the mean hospital stay was 3.8?±?0.8 versus 4.2?±?1.4?days in the two groups (p?=?0.06), respectively. Three and four complications were recorded in the LESS-RN and in the LRN groups, for a mean complication rate of 12 and 12.9?% (p?=?0.12), respectively All tumours were organ-confined with negative surgical margins, and the mean R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score for LESS-RN and LRN was 9.78?±?1.7 and 9.82?±?1.3 (p?=?0.14), respectively. Conclusions LESS-RN in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery is equally effective as LRN without compromising on surgical, oncologic short-term and postoperative outcomes.