Is ecosystem service research used by decision-makers? A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Darla Hatton MacDonald (1) (2)
Rosalind H. Bark (3)
Anthea Coggan (3) - 关键词：Policy ; Science ; policy interface ; Water re ; allocation ; Environmental benefits ; Ecosystem service assessment
- 刊名：Landscape Ecology
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：October 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：29
- 期：8
- 页码：1447-1460
- 全文大小：510 KB
- 参考文献：1. Ash N, Blanco H, Brown C, Garcia K, Henrichs T, Lucas N, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Simpson RD, Scholes R, Tomich TP, Vira B, Zurek M (eds) (2010) Ecosystems and human well-being a manual for assessment practitioners. Island Press, Washington
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2011) Gross value of irrigated agricultural production, 2000鈥?001 to 2009鈥?010. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbyReleaseDate/260FCB911BB08982CA257AD2000F1CC1?OpenDocument. Accessed 30 May 2013
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) (2009) Socio-economic context for the Murray-Darling Basin鈥攄escriptive report. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra
4. Australian Conservation Foundation (2012) ACF submission on the draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan 2011. https://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACFBasinPlanSubmission160412.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013
5. Banerjee O, Bark RH (2013). Incentives for ecosystem service supply in Australia鈥檚 Murray-Darling Basin. Int J Water Resour Dev. http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/pvkejHiiRK8BEQ5AcZ58/full. Accessed 5 March 2013
6. Banerjee O, Bark R, Connor J, Crossman N (2013) An ecosystem services approach to estimating economic losses associated with drought. Ecol Econ 91:19鈥?7 CrossRef
7. Bark RH, Peeters LJM, Lester RE, Pollino CA, Crossman DE, Kandulu JM (2013) Understanding the sources of uncertainty to reduce the risks of undesirable outcomes in large-scale freshwater ecosystem restoration projects: an example from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Environ Sci Policy 33:97鈥?08 CrossRef
8. Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2011) Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resour Econ 48(2):177鈥?18 CrossRef
9. Bruce G, Critchley C (2012) Swinburne National Technology and Society Monitor. Psychological Sciences & Statistics Faculty of Life & Social Sciences Swinburne University of Technology 2012 Monitor, Hawthorn
10. Bryan BA, Higgins A, Overton IC, Holland K, Lester RE, King D, Nolan M, MacDonald DH, Connor JD, Bjornsson T, Kirby M (2013) Ecohydrological and socioeconomic integration for the operational management of environmental flows. Ecol Appl 23(5):999鈥?016 CrossRef
11. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:1305鈥?312 CrossRef
12. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston D, J盲ger J, Mitchell R (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8086鈥?091 CrossRef
13. Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Water Amendment (long-term average sustainable diversion limit adjustment) Bill. A Bill for an Act to amend the Water Act 2007 in relation to long-term average sustainable diversion limits, and for related purposes. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
14. Conallin AJ, Smith BB, Thwaites LA, Walker KF, Gillanders BM (2012) Environmental water allocations in regulated lowland rivers may encourage offstream movements and spawning by common carp, / Cyprinus carpio: implications for wetland rehabilitation. Mar Freshw Res 63(10):865鈥?77 CrossRef
15. CSIRO (2012) Assessment of the ecological and economic benefits of environmental water in the Murray鈥揇arling Basin. CSIRO water for a healthy country national research flagship, Australia. http://www.mdba.gov.au/files/bp-kid/2017-assessment_Ecological_Economic_Benefits.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2013
16. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21鈥?8 CrossRef
17. DIISRTE (2012) APS200 Project鈥攖he place of science in policy development in the public service. Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, Australian Government
18. Dunlop CA (2010) The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sci 43:343鈥?63 CrossRef
19. Eisenhardt (1989) Building theories form case study research. Acad Manag 14(4):532鈥?50
20. Fisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M, Brouwer R, De Groot R, Farber S, Ferraro P, Green R, Hadley D, Harlow J, Jefferiss P, Kirkby C, Morling P, Mowatt S, Naidoo R, Paavola J, Strassburg B, Yu D, Balmford A (2008) Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecol Appl 18(8):2050鈥?067 CrossRef
21. Fisher M, Cook S, Tiemann T, Nickum J (2011) Institutions and organizations: the key to sustainable management of resources in river basins. Water Int 36(7):846鈥?60 CrossRef
22. Garrick G, Bark R (2011) Comparative perspective on basin governance in the Murray Darling Basin: insights from the western US. In: Connell D, Quentin Grafton R (eds) Basin futures: water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra, pp 367鈥?84. ISBN 9781921862243
23. Garrick D, Bark RH, Connor J, Banerjee O (2012) Environmental water governance in federal rivers: opportunities and limits of subsidiarity in the River Murray of Australia. Water Policy 14:915鈥?36 CrossRef
24. Gerring J (2007) Case study research. Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Grafton RQ, Pittock J, Davis R, Williams J, Fu G, Warburton M, Udall B, McKenzie R, Yu X, Che N, Connell D, Jiang Q, Kompas T, Lynch A, Norris R, Possingham H, Quiggin J (2013) Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nat Clim Change 3:315鈥?21 CrossRef
26. Hatton MacDonald D, Morrison M, Rose J, Boyle K (2011) Valuing a multi-state river: the case of the river Murray. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 55(3):373鈥?91
27. Hatton MacDonald D, Bark R, MacRae A, Kalivas T, Grandgirard A, Strathearn S (2013) An interview methodology for exploring the values that community leaders assign to multiple-use landscapes. Ecol Soc 18(1):29
28. Hauck J, G枚rg C, Varjopuro R, Ratam盲ki O, Maes J, Wittmer H, Jax K (2013) 鈥淢aps have an air of authority鈥? potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosyst Serv 4:25鈥?2 CrossRef
29. Hillman T (2008) Ecological requirements: creating a working river in the Murray-Darling Basin. In: Crase L (ed) Water policy in Australia: the impact of change and uncertainty. Resources for the Future, Washington
30. James TE, Jorgensen PD (2009) Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change: revisiting a foundational question. Policy Stud J 37(1):141鈥?62 CrossRef
31. Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2005) The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
32. Kenward RE, Whittingham MJ, Arampatzis S, Manos BD, Hahn T, Terry A, Simoncini R, Alcorn J, Bastian O, Donlan M, Elowe K, Franz茅n F, Karacsonyi Z, Larsson M, Manou D, Navodaru I, Papadopoulou O, Papathanasiou J, von Raggamby A, Sharp RJA, S枚derqvist T, Soutukorva 脜, Vavrova L, Aebischer NJ, Leader-Williams N, Rutz C (2011) Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(13):5308鈥?312 CrossRef
33. Kingsford R (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and water management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Aust J Ecol 25:109鈥?27 CrossRef
34. Kingsford RT, Walker KF, Lester RE, Young WJ, Fairweather PG, Sammut J, Geddes MC (2011) A Ramsar wetland in crisis鈥攖he Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 62(3):255鈥?65 CrossRef
35. Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Bill茅 R, Pirard R, Mermet L (2013) Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manag 119:208鈥?19 CrossRef
36. Litfin KT (1994) Ozone discourses. Columbia University Press, New York
37. Lockwood M (2005) Integration of natural area values: conceptual foundations and methodological approaches. Australas J Environ Manag 12:8鈥?9 CrossRef
38. Mart铆n-L贸pez B, G贸mez-Baggethun E, Garc铆a-Llorente M, Montes C (2013) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic 30:118鈥?45
39. McCann L, Colby B, Easter KW, Kasterine A, Kuperan KV (2005) Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecol Econ 52(4):527鈥?42 CrossRef
40. MDBA (2012a) Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Proposed Basin Plan鈥攁 revised draft. MDBA, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/archived/revised-BP/PBP_reviseddraft.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2013
41. MDBA (2012b) Regulation Impact Statement Basin Plan. MDBA, Canberra. http://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/Basin-Plan/Basin-Plan-RIS-Nov2012.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2013
42. Miles M, Huberman A (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, California
43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington
44. Mitchell R, Carson R (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington
45. Morrison M, Hatton MacDonald D (2010) Using environmental valuation to inform the setting of sustainable diversion limits for the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. Report to the Murray Darling Basin Authority, September 2010
46. Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) (2010) Guide to the proposed basin plan. (MDBA), Canberra
47. Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) (2011) Delivering a healthy working basin鈥攁bout the draft basin plan. MDBA, Canberra
48. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23(6):633鈥?44 CrossRef
49. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Taylor H, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4鈥?1. doi:10.1890/080023 CrossRef
50. Nueman WL (2003) Social research methods; qualitative and quantitative approaches, 5th edn. Pearson Education Inc, Boston
51. Overton I, Saintilan N (eds) (2010) Ecosystem response modelling in the Murray-Darling Basin. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne
52. Palmer MA, Reidy Liermann CA, Nilsson C, Fl枚rke M, Alcamo J, Lake PS, Bond N (2008) Climate change and the world鈥檚 river basins: anticipating management options. Front Ecol Environ 6(2):81鈥?9 CrossRef
53. Pierson P (1996) The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis. Comp Polit Stud 29(2):123鈥?63 CrossRef
54. Pittock J (2013) Lessons from adaptation to sustain freshwater environments in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 4(5):429鈥?38
55. Pittock J, Cork S, Maynard S (2012) The state of the application of ecosystems services in Australia. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):111鈥?20 CrossRef
56. Pittock J, Finlayson CM, Howitt J (2013) Beguiling and risky: 鈥榚nvironmental works and measures鈥?for wetland conservation under a changing climate. Hydrobiologia 708(1):111鈥?31 CrossRef
57. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2012) Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x
58. Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21:129鈥?68 CrossRef
59. Star S, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, 鈥榯ranslations鈥?and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley鈥檚 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907鈥?939. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387鈥?20. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 CrossRef
60. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2003) Handbook of mixed methods sampling in social and behavioural research. Sage, London
61. TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. In: Kumar P (ed) Ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London
62. Trabucchi M, Ntshotsho P, O鈥橣arrel P, Com铆n F (2012) Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: a review. J Environ Manag 111(30):18鈥?3 CrossRef
63. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: synthesis of the key findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge
64. Webb S, Folland L (2011) CSIRO鈥擟ommunity Attitudes Research: attitudes towards science and CSIRO, Ogilvy Illumination Strategic communications research, Ogilvy Illumination, p 68
65. Weiss C (1979) The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 39:426鈥?31 CrossRef
66. Yin R (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, California - 作者单位：Darla Hatton MacDonald (1) (2)
Rosalind H. Bark (3)
Anthea Coggan (3)
1. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, PMB2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
2. School of Accounting and Finance, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia
3. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD, 4102, Australia - ISSN：1572-9761
文摘
This paper investigates the accessibility and usefulness of the Ecosystem Services (ES) framework to policy analysts. Using a mixed methods approach of document analysis and semi-structured interviews we examine how an ES assessment of the benefits of restoring water to the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) in Australia has been used by government agencies in policy and planning. The ES assessment links changes in water management under the Basin Plan with modelled changes in water quality, river flows and inundation patterns and in turn to modelled freshwater and estuarine ecosystem response. These ecological responses were expressed in terms of incremental ES benefits which were valued monetarily using a variety of valuation techniques. To investigate how these pieces of information were used in the policy debate around the re-allocation of water in the MDB, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 Australian, State, and local government officials as well as academics and consultants. The interviews were designed to uncover the complex information dissemination process through networks within and among agencies. The results are mixed as to whether the assessment served to influence public policy. The report has been utilized and cited by Australian federal agencies, the downstream State of South Australia and conservation-based NGOs in their position statements and as such has been used as evidence in support of re-allocation of water in the MDB. A number of interview participants commented that the ES assessment raised awareness and this may lead to broader usage of the information and framework in the implementation phase of MDB water reform.