Hierarchical Rank Aggregation with Applications to Nanotoxicology

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Trina Patel (1) (2)
  Donatello Telesca (1) (2)
  Robert Rallo (2) (3)
  Saji George (2) (4)
  Tian Xia (2) (4)
  André E. Nel (2) (4)
  
• 关键词：Bayesian hierarchical models ; Hazard ranking ; Loss functions ; Nanotoxicology
• 刊名：Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：June 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：18
• 期：2
• 页码：159-177
• 全文大小：1522KB
• 参考文献：1. DeGroot, M. H. (2004), / Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York: Wiley. CrossRef
  2. DeSemet, Y., Sprinagael, J., and Kunsch, P. (2002), “Towards Statistical Multicriteria Decision Modeling: A First Approach,- / Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11 (6), 305-13. CrossRef
  3. Dominici, F., Parmigiani, G., Wolpert, R. L., and Hasselblad, V. (1999), “Meta-Analysis of Migraine Headache Treatments: Combining Information from Heterogeneous Designs,- / Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 16-8. CrossRef
  4. Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M., and Sivakumar, D. (2001), “Rank Aggregation Methods for the Web,-in / Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp.?613-22.
  5. Edler, L., Poirier, K., Dourson, M., Kleiner, J., Mileson, B., Nordmann, H., Renwick, A., Slob, W., Walton, K., and Würtzen, G. (2002), “Mathematical Modelling and Quantitative Methods,- / Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40, 283-26. CrossRef
  6. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., and Sivakumar, D. (2003), “Comparing Top-k Lists,- / Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 17 (1), 134-60.
  7. Geisser, S. (1980), “Discussion on Sampling and Bayes Inference in Scientific Modeling and Robustness,- / Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 143, 416-17.
  8. George, S., Pokhrel, S., Xia, T., Gilbert, B., Ji, Z., Schowalter, M., Rosenauer, A., Damoiseaux, R., Bradley, K., Madler, L., and Nel, A. (2010), “Use of a Rapid Cytotoxicity Screening Approach to Engineer a Safer Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Through Iron Doping,- / American Chemical Society, 4 (1), 15-9.
  9. George, S., Xia, T., Rallo, R., Zhao, Y., Ji, Z., Lin, S., Wang, X., Zhang, H., France, B., Schoenfeld, D., Damoiseaux, R., Liu, R., Lin, S., Bradley, K., Cohen, Y., and Nel, A. (2011), “Use of a High-Throughput Screening Approach Coupled with in Vivo Zebrafish Embryo Screening to Develop Hazard Ranking for Engineered Nanomaterials,- / ACS Nano, 5 (3), 1805-817. CrossRef
  10. Hardman, R. (2006), “A?Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors,- / Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 165-72. CrossRef
  11. Lerche, D., and S?rensen, P. (2003), “Evaluation of the Ranking Probabilities for Partial Orders Based on Random Linear Extensions,- / Chemosphere, 53, 981-92. CrossRef
  12. Lerche, D., Brüggemann, R., S?rensen, P., Carlsen, L., and Nielsen, O. (2002), “A Comparison of Partial Order Technique with Three Methods of Multi-criteria Analysis for Ranking of Chemical Substances,- / Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 42, 1086-098.
  13. Lerche, D., Matsuzaki, S., S?rensen, P., Carlsen, L., and Nielsen, O. (2004), “Ranking of Chemical Substances Based on the Japanese Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Using Partial Order Theory and Random Linear Extensions,- / Chemosphere, 55, 1005-025. CrossRef
  14. Lilienblum, W., Dekant, W., Foth, H., Gebel, T., Hengstler, J., Kahl, R., Kramer, P., Schweinfurth, H., and Wollin, K. (2008), “Alternative Methods to Safety Studies in Experimental Animals: Role in the Risk Assessment of Chemicals Under the New European Chemicals Legislation (Reach),- / Archives of Toxicology, 82 (4), 211-36. CrossRef
  15. Lin, R., Louis, T., Paddock, S., and Ridegeway, G. (2006), “Loss Function Based Ranking in Two-Stage, Hierarchical Models,- / Bayesian Analysis, 1 (4), 915-46. CrossRef
  16. -(2009), “Ranking USRDS Provider Specific SMRs from 1998-001,- / Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 9, 22-8. CrossRef
  17. Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Steevens, J., Ferguson, E., and Pleus, R. C. (2007), “Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Environmental Risk Assessment for Nanomaterials,- / Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9, 543-54. CrossRef
  18. Lockwood, J., Louis, T., and McCaffrey, D. (2002), “Uncertainty in Rank Estimation: Implications for Value-Added Modeling Accountability Systems,- / Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27 (3), 255-70. CrossRef
  19. Louis, T., and Shen, W. (1999). “Innovations in Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods: Estimating Parameters, Populations and Ranks,- / Statistics in Medicine, 18.
  20. Maynard, A., Aitken, R., Butz, T., Colvin, V., Donaldson, K., Oberd?rster, G., Philbert, M., Ryan, J., Seaton, A., Stone, V., Tinkle, S., Tran, L., Walker, N., and Warheit, D. (2006), “Safe Handling of Nanotechnology,- / Nature Biotechnology, 444, 267-68. CrossRef
  21. Nel, A., M?dler, L., Velegol, D., Xial, T., Hoek, E., Somasundaran, P., Klaessig, F., Castranova, V., and Thompson, M. (2009), “Understanding Biophysicochemical Interactions at the Nano–Bio Interface,- / Nature Materials, 8, 543-57. CrossRef
  22. Noma, H., Matsui, M., Omori, T., and Sato, T. (2010), “Bayesian Ranking and Selection Methods Using Hierarchical Mixture Models in Microarray Studies,- / Biostatistics, 11 (2), 281-89. CrossRef
  23. Parmigiani, G., and Inoue, L. Y. T. (2009), / Decision Theory. Principles and Approaches, New York: Wiley. CrossRef
  24. Patel, T., Telesca, D., George, S., and Nel, A. (2012). “Toxicity Profiling of Engineered Nanomaterials via Multivariate Dose Response Surface Modeling- / Annals of Applied Statistics.
  25. Plummerm, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., and Vines, K. (2006), “CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis for MCMC,- / R News, 6 (1), 7-1.
  26. Shen, W., and Louis, T. (1998), “Triple-Goal Estimates in Two-Stage, Hierarchical Models,- / Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 60, 455-71. CrossRef
  27. Society, R. (2004). “Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties,- / The Royal Society, Science Policy Section, London, England.
  28. Stanley, S., Westly, E., Pittet, M., Subramanian, A., Schreiber, S., and Weissleder, R. (2008), “Perturbational Profiling of Nanomaterial Biologic Activity,- / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (21), 7387-392. CrossRef
  29. Stern, S., and McNeil, S. (2008), “Nanotechnology Safety Concerns Revisited,- / Toxicological Sciences, 101 (1), 4-1. CrossRef
  30. Tsuji, J., Maynard, A., Howard, P., James, J., Lam, C., Warheit, D., and Santamaria, A. (2005), “Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part?iv: Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles,- / Toxicological Sciences, 89, 1. CrossRef
  31. Xia, T., Kovochich, M., Brant, J., Hotze, M., Sempf, J., Oberley, T., Sioutas, C., Yeh, J. I., Wiesner, M., and Nel, A. (2006), “Comparison of the Abilities of Ambient and Manufactured Nanoparticles to Induce Cellular Toxicity According to an Oxidative Stress Paradigm,- / Nano Letters, 6 (8), 1794-807. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Trina Patel (1) (2)
  Donatello Telesca (1) (2)
  Robert Rallo (2) (3)
  Saji George (2) (4)
  Tian Xia (2) (4)
  André E. Nel (2) (4)
  
  1. Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
  2. UC Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN), 6522 CNSI Bldg, 570 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7227, USA
  3. Dep. d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Av. Pa?sos Catalans, 26, 43007, Tarragona, Catalunya, Spain
  4. UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1736, USA
  
• ISSN：1537-2693

文摘

The development of high throughput screening (HTS) assays in the field of nanotoxicology provide new opportunities for the hazard assessment and ranking of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). It is often necessary to rank lists of materials based on multiple risk assessment parameters, often aggregated across several measures of toxicity and possibly spanning an array of experimental platforms. Bayesian models coupled with the optimization of loss functions have been shown to provide an effective framework for conducting inference on ranks. In this article we present various loss-function-based ranking approaches for comparing ENM within experiments and toxicity parameters. Additionally, we propose a framework for the aggregation of ranks across different sources of evidence while allowing for differential weighting of this evidence based on its reliability and importance in risk ranking. We apply these methods to high throughput toxicity data on two human cell-lines, exposed to eight different nanomaterials, and measured in relation to four cytotoxicity outcomes. This article has supplementary material online.