Use of sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers for comparing levels of genetic diversity in centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack.) germplasm

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Susana R. Milla-Lewis (1) susana_milla-lewis@ncsu.edu
  Jennifer A. Kimball (1)
  M. Carolina Zuleta (1)
  Karen R. Harris-Shultz (2)
  Brian M. Schwartz (3)
  Wayne W. Hanna (3)
• 关键词：Centipedegrass &#8211 ; Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack. &#8211 ; Genetic diversity &#8211 ; Germplasm collection &#8211 ; SRAP markers
• 刊名：Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：October 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：59
• 期：7
• 页码：1517-1526
• 全文大小：339.2 KB
• 参考文献：1. Bouton JH, Dudeck AE, Smith RL, Green RL (1983) Plant breeding characteristics relating to improvement of centipedegrass. Soil Crop Sci Fla Proc 42:53–58
  2. Brown WV (1950) A cytological study of some Texas Gramineae. Bull Torrey Bot Club 77:63–76
  3. Budak H, Shearman RC, Parmaksiz I, Gaussoin RE, Riordan TP, Dweikat I (2003) Molecular characterization of buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. Theor Appl Genet 108(2):328–334
  4. Callahan LM (1999) Registration of ‘TennTurf’ centipedegrass. Crop Sci 38:873
  5. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302
  6. Donini P, Law JR, Koebner RMD, Reeves JC, Cooke RJ (2000) Temporal trends in the diversity of UK wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100:912–917
  7. Ferriol M, Pic贸 B, Nuez F (2003) Genetic diversity of a germplasm collection of Cucurbita pepo using SRAP and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 107(2):271–282
  8. Ferriol M, Pic贸 B, Fern谩ndez de C贸rdova P, Nuez F (2004) Molecular Diversity of a germplasm collection of squash (Cucurbita moschata) determined by SRAP and AFLP markers. Crop Sci 44(2):653–664
  9. Fu YB (2009) FPTest: a SAS routine for testing differences in allelic count. Mol Ecol Resour 10(2):389–392
  10. Geuna F, Toschi M, Bassi D (2003) The use of AFLP markers for cultivar identification in apricot. Plant Breed 122:526–531
  11. Hanna WW (1995) Centipedegrass-diversity and vulnerability. Crop Sci 35:332–334
  12. Hanna WW, Burton GW (1978) Cytology, reproductive behavior, and fertility characteristics of centipedegrass. Crop Sci 18:835–837
  13. Hanna WW, Dobson J, Duncan RR, Thompson D (1997) Registration of ‘TifBlair’ centipedegrass. Crop Sci 37:1017
  14. Hanson A, Juska F, Burton G (1969) Species and varieties. In: Hanson AA, Juska FV (eds) Turfgrass science. Agron Monogr 14. ASA, Madison, pp 370–377
  15. Li G, Quiros CF (2001) Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103:455–461
  16. Liu J, Hanna W, Elsner E, Zhou J (2002) Germplasm investigation of centipedegrass in the People’s Republic of China. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 132:53–56
  17. Liu J, Hanna WW, Elsner E (2003) Morphological and seed set characteristics of centipedegrass accessions collected in China. Econ Bot 57:380–388
  18. Ortega OR, Duran E, Arbizu C, Ortega R, Roca W, Potter D, Quiros CF (2007) Pattern of genetic diversity of cultivated and non-cultivated mashua, Tropaeolum tuberosum, in the Cusco region of Per煤. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:807–821
  19. Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.2. Exeter Software, Setauket
  20. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2002) ARLEQUIN ver. 2.001: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland (available athttp://lgb.unige.ch/arlequin/software) (verified 19 May 2004)
  21. Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A (2007) Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated, and elite barleys. Plant Sci 173:638–649
  22. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Hornes M, Friters A, Pot J, Paleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414
  23. Weaver K, Callahan L, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff P (1995) DNA amplification fingerprinting and hybridization analysis of centipedegrass. Crop Sci 35:881–885
  24. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535
• 作者单位：1. Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620, USA2. Crop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793, USA3. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794-0748, USA
• ISSN：1573-5109

文摘

Centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack.) has great potential as a low-input turf within the U.S. because of its lower management requirements and its tolerance to an array of environmental stresses. Only a handful of centipedegrass cultivars have been released to date, however. This is mainly due to limited morphological variation present in U.S. centipedegrass germplasm. With the objective of broadening the genetic base of this species, a germplasm collection trip was conducted in seven Chinese provinces in 1999. Although the resulting accessions exhibited morphological variation for a number of traits, little is known about levels of molecular variability in these accessions or how those levels compare to diversity in materials previously present in the U.S. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers were used in the current study to investigate these issues. Eleven primer combinations yielded 279 scored fragments. Genetic diversity, in terms of number of alleles and Dice similarity values, was highest in the Henan and U.S. groups. AMOVA indicated that while both the among and within components of variance were significant (P < 0.0001), most of the variation (94%) could be explained by differences within groups. The PCO plot showed large differences in levels of diversity in all groups evaluated. Overall, our results indicate that while the U.S. collection had high levels of diversity compared to other groups, there are alleles in the Chinese groups not represented in the U.S. collection. These materials could represent additional sources of variation to be used in centipedegrass cultivar development programs.