Manipulability agreement as a predictor of action initiation latency

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Katherine Guérard ; Mathieu B. Brodeur
• 关键词：Norms ; Object ; Motor affordance
• 刊名：Behavior Research Methods
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：June 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：47
• 期：2
• 页码：572-579
• 全文大小：318 KB
• 参考文献：Barbarotto, R., Laiacona, M., & Capitani, E. (2008). Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories. Cortex, 44, 1161-170. doi:10.-016/?j.?cortex.-007.-8.-16 View Article PubMed
  Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-60. doi:10.-017/?S0140525X9900214-
  Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS One, 5, 10773. doi:10.-371/?journal.?pone.-010773 View Article
  Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Bukach, C. M. (2003). Gesturing and naming: The use of functional knowledge in object identification. Psychological Science, 14, 467-72. doi:10.-111/-467-9280.-2455 View Article PubMed
  Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106, 27-8. doi:10.-016/?j.?cognition.-006.-2.-10 View Article PubMed
  Cisek, P. (2006). Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9761-770. doi:10.-523/?JNEUROSCI.-605-05.-006 View Article PubMed
  Downing-Doucet, F., & Guérard, K. (in press). A motor similarity effect in object memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.-758/?s13423-013-0570-5
  Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-71. doi:10.-348/-00712600161934 View Article PubMed
  Girardi, G., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 330-40. doi:10.-037/?a0017180 PubMed
  Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-5. doi:10.-017/?S0140525X9700001- PubMed
  Guérard, K., Lagacé, S., & Brodeur, M.?B. (in press). Four types of manipulability ratings and naming latencies for a set of 560 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods.
  Helbig, H. B., Steinwender, J., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 251-58. doi:10.-007/?s00221-009-1953-8 View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition, 115, 350-55. doi:10.-016/?j.?cognition.-010.-1.-04 View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  Johnson-Frey, S. H., & Grafton, S. T. (2003). From “acting on-to “acting with- The functional anatomy of action representation. In D. P. C. Prablanc & Y. Rossetti (Eds.), Space coding and action production (pp. 127-39). New York, NY: Elsevier.View Article
  Lagacé, S., Downing-Doucet, F., & Guérard, K. (2013). Norms for grip agreement for 296 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 772-81. doi:10.-758/?s13428-012-0283-0 View Article PubMed
  Magnié, M. N., Besson, M., Poncet, M., & Dolisi, C. (2003). The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: Norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 521-60. doi:10.-076/?jcen.-5.-.-21.-3873 View Article PubMed
  Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Besson, M., Magnié, M., & Cramon, Y. V. (2002). Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1115-123. doi:10.-093/?cercor/-2.-1.-115 View Article PubMed
  Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Weiskopf, N., & Doeller, C. F. (2004). Motor affordance and its role for visual working memory: Evidence from fMRI studies. Experimental Psychology, 51, 258-69. doi:10.-027/-618-3169.-1.-.-58 View Article PubMed
  Olivier, G., & Velay, J. L. (2009). Visual objects can potentiate a grasping neural simulation which interferes with manual response execution. Acta Psychologica, 130, 147-52. doi:10.-016/?j.?actpsy.-008.-1.-04 View Article PubMed
  Pecher, D. (2013). No role for motor affordances in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 2-3. doi:10.-037/?a0028642 PubMed
  Salmon, J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 82-5. doi:10.-758/?BRM.-2.-.-2 View Article PubMed
  Vainio, L., Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2007). Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping. Brain and Cognition, 65, 195-07. doi:10.-016/?j.?bandc.-007.-7.-04 View Article PubMed
  Versace, R., Labeye, é., Badard,
• 作者单位：Katherine Guérard (1)
  Mathieu B. Brodeur (2)
  
  1. école de psychologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
  2. Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  
• 刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1554-3528

文摘

In the domain of cognition, an increasing number of researchers are interested in the role of objects-motor affordances in cognitive processing. However, outside of the existing norms on the objects-levels of manipulability (e.g., Magnié, Besson, Poncet, & Dolisi, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25:521-60,2003), relatively few norms exist that would allow researchers to have good control over objects-motor dimensions. In the present study, we have provided norms on the extent to which participants agreed about the movements typically performed for using specific objects—what we will call manipulability agreement. We showed that manipulability agreement was a good predictor of the times needed to initiate the action associated with the object. This study provides ratings on a new dimension of objects-motor affordances that could be useful to researchers in the domain of visual cognition.