The role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance in the Hebb repetition paradigm: implications for sequence learning
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Katherine Guérard (1)
Jean Saint-Aubin (1)
Pierre Boucher (1)
Sébastien Tremblay (2) - 关键词：Sequence learning ; Anticipation ; Awareness ; Memory ; Hebb repetition
- 刊名：Memory & Cognition
- 出版年：2011
- 出版时间：August 2011
- 年：2011
- 卷：39
- 期：6
- 页码：1012-1022
- 全文大小：722KB
- 参考文献：1. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. / Psychological Review, 106, 551-81. doi:
2. Couture, M., & Tremblay, S. (2006). A Hebb repetition effect for visuo-spatial information. / Memory & Cognition, 34, 1720-729. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195933">CrossRef
3. Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189-02. doi:
4. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (2003). What can we infer from double dissociations? / Cortex, 39, 1-. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70070-4">CrossRef
5. Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., & Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 970-87. doi:
6. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. / Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-40. doi:
7. Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J. E., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals. / Psychological Science, 19, 1201-206. doi:
8. Gagnon, S., Bédard, M. J., & Turcotte, J. (2005). The effect of old age on learning of supra-span spatial sequences under intentional and incidental encoding instructions. / Brain and Cognition, 59, 225-35. doi:
9. Hebb, D. O. (1961). Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal. In J. F. Delafresnaye (Ed.), / Brain mechanisms and learning: A symposium (pp. 37-1). Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1997). Stimulus–response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. / Psychological Research, 60, 87-7. doi:
11. Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., & Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1008-018. doi:
12. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2008). Action planning in sequential skills: Relations to music performance. / The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 275-91. doi:
13. Koch, I. (2007). Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus–response compatibility. / Human Movement Science, 26, 257-74. doi:
14. MacLeod, C. M., & Hodder, S. L. (1998). Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference. / Memory &Cognition, 26, 212-19. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03201134">CrossRef
15. Marcus, D. J., Karatekin, C., & Markiewicz, S. (2006). Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task. / Memory & Cognition, 34, 420-32. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193419">CrossRef
16. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. / Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-20.
17. McKelvie, S. J. (1987). Learning and awareness in the Hebb digits task. / The Journal of General Psychology, 114, 75-8. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1987.9711057">CrossRef
18. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. / Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-2. doi:
19. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (2009). Is there a common mechanism underlying word-form learning and the Hebb repetition effect? Experimental data and a modelling framework. In A. Thorn & M. P. A. Page (Eds.), / Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (pp. 136-56). Hove, U.K: Psychology Press.
20. Page, M. P. A., Cumming, N., Norris, D., Hitch, G., & McNeil, A. (2006). Repetition learning in the immediate serial recall of visual and auditory materials. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 716-33. doi:
21. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. / The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-5. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231">CrossRef
22. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: A role for visuospatial attention. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 528-41. doi:
23. Rünger, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: Theoretical considerations and empirical implications. / Psychological Research, 74, 121-37. doi:
24. Rüsseler, J., Hennighausen, E., & R?sler, F. (2001). Response anticipation processes in the learning of a sensorimotor sequence: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. / Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 95-05. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.15.2.95">CrossRef
25. Saint-Aubin, J., Kenny, S., & Roy-Charland, A. (2010). The role of eye movements in the missing-letter effect revisited with the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. / Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 47-2. doi:
26. Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674-85. doi:
27. Sumner, P., & Husain, M. (2008). At the edge of consciousness: Automatic motor activation and voluntary control. / The Neuroscientist, 14, 474-86. doi:
28. Tremblay, S., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2009). Evidence of anticipatory eye movements in the spatial Hebb repetition effect: Insights for modeling sequence learning. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1256-265. doi:
29. Tubau, E., & López-Moliner, J. (2003). Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge. / Psychological Research, 68, 55-3. doi:
30. Turcotte, J., Gagnon, S., & Poirier, M. (2005). The effect of old age on learning of supra-span sequences. / Psychology and Aging, 20, 251-60. doi:
31. Ward, G., Avons, S. E., & Melling, L. (2005). Serial position curves in short-term memory: Functional equivalence across modalities. / Memory, 13, 308-17. doi:
32. Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. / Psychological Review, 105, 558-84. doi:
33. Willingham, D. B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. / Psychological Science, 10, 531-34. doi:
34. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047-060. doi:
35. Zirngibl, C., & Koch, I. (2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. / Experimental Psychology, 49, 153-62. doi: - 作者单位：Katherine Guérard (1)
Jean Saint-Aubin (1)
Pierre Boucher (1)
Sébastien Tremblay (2)
1. école de psychologie, Université de Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
2. école de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
文摘
Sequence learning has notably been studied using the Hebb repetition paradigm (Hebb, 1961) and the serial reaction time (SRT) task (Nissen & Bullemer, Cognitive Psychology 19:1-2, 1987). These two paradigms produce robust learning effects but differ with regard to the role of awareness: Awareness does not affect learning a repeated sequence in the Hebb repetition paradigm, as is evidenced by recall performance, whereas in the SRT task, awareness helps to anticipate the location of the next stimulus. In this study, we examined the role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance, using the Hebb repetition paradigm. Eye movements were monitored during a spatial reconstruction task where participants had to memorize sequences of dot locations. One sequence was repeated every four trials. Results showed that recall performance for the repeated sequence improved across repetitions for all participants but that anticipation increased only for participants aware of the repetition.