Norms for grip agreement for 296 photographs of objects
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Sébastien Lagacé (1)
Frédéric Downing-Doucet (1)
Katherine Guérard (1) - 关键词：Norms ; Grip type ; Objects
- 刊名：Behavior Research Methods
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：September 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：45
- 期：3
- 页码：772-781
- 全文大小：288KB
- 参考文献：1. Barbarotto, R., Laiacona, M., Macchi, V., & Capitani, E. (2002). Picture reality decision, semantic categories and gender: A new set of pictures, with norms and an experimental study. / Neuropsychologia, 40, 1637-653. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00029-5">CrossRef
2. Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. / PLoS One, 5, e10773. doi:
3. Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2012). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. / Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141, 502-17. doi:
4. Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. / Cognition, 106, 27-8. doi:
5. Buxbaum, L. J., Sirigu, A., Schwartz, M. F., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. / Neuropsychologia, 41, 1091-113. doi:
6. Derbyshire, N., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2006). The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. / Acta Psychologica, 122, 74-8. doi:
7. Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. / British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-71. doi:
8. Feix, T. (2011). Human Grasping Database. Retrieved from net/" class="a-plus-plus">http://grasp.xief.net/
9. Filliter, J. H., McMullen, P. A., & Westwood, D. (2005). Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification. / Brain and Cognition, 57, 61-5. doi:
10. Girardi, G., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. / Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 330-40. doi:
11. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. / Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221-28. doi:
12. Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. / Cognition, 115, 350-55. doi:
13. Johnson-Frey, S. H., & Grafton, S. T. (2003). From “acting on-to “acting with- The functional anatomy of action representation. In D. P. C. Prablanc & Y. Rossetti (Eds.), / Space coding and action production (pp. 127-39). New York: Elsevier. nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42010-4">CrossRef
14. Randerath, J., Li, Y., Goldenberg, G., & Hermsd?rfer, J. (2009). Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia. / Neuropsychologia, 47, 497-05. doi:
15. Salmon, J. P., McMullen, P. A., & Filliter, J. H. (2010). Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. / Behavior Research Methods, 42, 82-5. doi:
16. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-15. doi:
17. Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. / Cognition, 108, 444-65. doi:
18. Yoon, E. Y., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Modeling direct perceptual constraints on action selection: The naming and action model (NAM). / Visual Cognition, 9, 615-61. doi: - 作者单位：Sébastien Lagacé (1)
Frédéric Downing-Doucet (1)
Katherine Guérard (1)
1. école de psychologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
文摘
An increasing number of studies are investigating the cognitive processes underlying human–object interactions. For instance, several researchers have manipulated the type of grip associated with objects in order to study the role of the objects-motor affordances in cognition. The objective of the present study was to develop norms for the types of grip employed when grasping and using objects, with a set of 296 photographs of objects. On the basis of these ratings, we computed measures of agreement to evaluate the extent to which participants agreed about the grip used to interact with these objects. We also collected ratings on the dissimilarity between the grips employed for grasping and for using objects, as well as the number of actions that can typically be performed with the objects. Our results showed grip agreements of 67?% for grasping and of 65?% for using objects. Moreover, our pattern of correlations is highly consistent with the idea that the grips for grasping and using objects represent two different motor dimensions of the objects.