Adaptive developmental plasticity: Compartmentalized responses to environmental cues and to corresponding internal signals provide phenotypic flexibility

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ana Rita A Mateus (1) (2)
  Manuel Marques-Pita (1) (3)
  Vicencio Oostra (2) (4)
  Elvira Lafuente (1)
  Paul M Brakefield (2) (4)
  Bas J Zwaan (5)
  Patr铆cia Beldade (1) (2)
  
  1. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ci锚ncia ; Rua da Quinta Grande 6 ; P-2780 ; Oeiras ; Portugal
  2. Institute of Biology ; Leiden University ; Sylviusweg 72 ; 2333 ; BE Leiden ; The Netherlands
  3. School of Informatics and Computing ; Indiana University ; 919 East Tenth Street ; Bloomington ; IN ; 47408 ; USA
  4. Department of Zoology ; Cambridge University ; Downing Street ; Cambridge ; CB2 3EJ ; UK
  5. Laboratory of Genetics ; Wageningen University ; Droevendaalsesteeg 1 ; 6708 ; PB Wageningen ; The Netherlands
  
• 关键词：Bicyclus anynana ; Developmental recombination ; Ecdysone ; Environmental input ; Modularity ; Phenotypic flexibility ; Physiology ; Seasonal polyphenism ; Thermal plasticity ; Trait ; specific sensitivities
• 刊名：BMC Biology
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：12
• 期：1
• 全文大小：3,014 KB
• 参考文献：1. Beldade, P, Mateus, AR, Keller, RA (2011) Evolution and molecular mechanisms of adaptive developmental plasticity. Mol Ecol 20: pp. 1347-1363 CrossRef
  2. Miura, T (2005) Developmental regulation of caste-specific characters in social-insect polyphenism. Evol Dev 7: pp. 122-129 CrossRef
  3. Schwander, T, Lo, N, Beekman, M, Oldroyd, BP, Keller, L (2010) Nature versus nurture in social insect caste differentiation. Trends Ecol Evol 25: pp. 275-282 CrossRef
  4. Keller, RA, Peeters, C, Beldade, P (2014) Evolution of thorax architecture in ant castes highlights trade-off between flight and ground behaviors. eLife 3: pp. e01539
  5. Simpson, SJ, Sword, GA, Lo, N (2011) Polyphenism in insects. Curr Biol 21: pp. 738-749 CrossRef
  6. Brakefield, PM, French, V (1999) Butterfly wings: the evolution of development of color patterns. Bioessays 21: pp. 391-401 CrossRef
  7. Nijhout, HF (2003) Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evol Dev 5: pp. 9-18 CrossRef
  8. Guthrie, HA, Brown, ML (1968) Effect of severe undernutrition in early life on growth, brain size and composition in adult rats. J Nur 94: pp. 419-426
  9. David, JR, Gilbert, P, Pla, E, Petavy, P, Karan, D, Moreteau, B (1998) Cold stress tolerance in Drosophila: analysis of chill coma recovery in D. melanogaster. J Therm Biol 23: pp. 291-299 CrossRef
  10. Shingleton, AW, Estep, CM, Driscoll, MV, Dworkin, I (2009) Many ways to be small: different environmental regulators of size generate distinct scaling relationships in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: pp. 2625-2633 CrossRef
  11. Cheverud, JM (1996) Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. Am Zool 36: pp. 44-50
  12. Wagner, GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am Zool 36: pp. 36-43
  13. Ketterson, ED, Atwell, JW, McGlothlin, JW (2009) Phenotypic integration and independence: hormones, performance, and response to environmental change. Integr Comp Biol 49: pp. 365-379 CrossRef
  14. Tang, HY, Smith-Caldas, MH, Driscoll, MV, Salhadar, S, Shingleton, AW (2011) FOXO regulates organ-specific phenotypic plasticity in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 7: pp. e1002373 CrossRef
  15. Koyama, T, Mendes, CC, Mirth, CK (2013) Mechanisms regulating nutrition-dependent developmental plasticity through organ-specific effects in insects. Front Physiol 4: pp. 263 CrossRef
  16. Brakefield, PM, Gates, J, Keys, D, Kesbeke, F, Wijngaarden, P, Monteiro, A, French, V, Carroll, S (1996) Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384: pp. 236-242 CrossRef
  17. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M: / Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. MA: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA; 1998.
  18. Gilbert, SF, Epel, D (2009) Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., MA
  19. Beldade, P, Brakefield, PM (2002) The genetics and evo鈥揹evo of butterfly wing patterns. Nat Rev Genet 3: pp. 442-452
  20. Brakefield PM, Beldade P, Zwaan BJ: The African butterfly Bicyclus anynana: a model for evolutionary genetics and evolutionary developmental biology. In / Emerging Model Organisms: A Laboratory Manual. Edited by Behringer RR, Johnson AD, Krumlauf RE. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2009:291鈥?29.
  21. Oostra, V, Jong, MA, Invergo, B, Kesbeke, F, Wende, F, Brakefield, PM, Zwaan, BJ (2011) Translating environmental gradients into discontinuous reaction norms via hormone signaling in a polyphenic butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 278: pp. 789-797 CrossRef
  22. Brakefield, PM, Kesbeke, F, Koch, PB (1998) The regulation of phenotypic plasticity of eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Amer Nat 152: pp. 853-860 CrossRef
  23. Koch, PB, Brakefield, PM, Kesbeke, F (1996) Ecdysteroids control eyespot size and wing color pattern in the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). J Insect Physiol 42: pp. 223-230 CrossRef
  24. Zijlstra, WG, Steigenga, MJ, Koch, PB, Zwaan, BJ, Brakefield, PM (2004) Butterfly selected lines explore the hormonal basis of interactions between life histories and morphology. Amer Nat 163: pp. 76-87 CrossRef
  25. Prudic, KL, Jeon, C, Cao, H, Monteiro, A (2011) Developmental plasticity in sexual roles of butterfly species drives mutual sexual ornamentation. Science 331: pp. 73-75 CrossRef
  26. Oliver, JM, Robertson, KA, Monteiro, A (2009) Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: pp. 2369-2375 CrossRef
  27. Beldade, P, Brakefield, PM (2003) Concerted evolution and developmental integration in modular butterfly wing patterns. Evol Dev 5: pp. 169-179 CrossRef
  28. Beldade, P, Koops, K, Brakefield, PM (2002) Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416: pp. 844-847 CrossRef
  29. Beldade, P, Koops, K, Brakefield, PM (2002) Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: pp. 14262-14267 CrossRef
  30. Allen, CE, Beldade, P, Zwaan, BJ, Brakefield, PM (2008) Differences in the selection response of serially repeated color pattern characters: standing variation, development, and evolution. BMC Evol Biol 8: pp. 94 CrossRef
  31. Saenko, SV, Brakefield, PM, Beldade, P (2010) Single locus affects embryonic segment polarity and multiple aspects of an adult evolutionary novelty. BMC Biol 8: pp. 111 CrossRef
  32. Brakefield PM, Frankino WA: Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution. In / Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects. Edited by Ananthakrishnan TN, Whitman DW. Plymouth, UK: Science Publishers, Inc; 2007:121鈥?51.
  33. Breuker, CJ, Brakefield, PM (2002) Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: pp. 1233-1239 CrossRef
  34. Westerman, EL, Chirathivat, N, Schyling, E, Monteiro, A (2014) Mate preference for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching. Evolution 68: pp. 1661-1670 CrossRef
  35. Saenko, SV, Marialva, MS, Beldade, P (2011) Involvement of the conserved Hox gene Antennapedia in the development and evolution of a novel trait. EvoDevo 2: pp. 9 CrossRef
  36. Nijhout, HF, Cinderella, M, Grunert, LW (2014) The development of wing shape in Lepidoptera: mitotic density, not orientation, is the primary determinant of shape. Evol Dev 16: pp. 68-77 CrossRef
  37. Koch, PB, Lorenz, U, Brakefield, PM (2000) Butterfly wing pattern mutants: developmental heterochrony and co-ordinately regulated phenotypes. Dev Genes Evol 210: pp. 536-544 CrossRef
  38. ffrench-Constant RH: Butterfly wing colors are driven by the evolution of developmental heterochrony. Butterfly wing colors and patterning by numbers. / Heredity 2012, 108:592鈥?93.
  39. Oostra, V, Mateus, AR, Burg, KR, Piessens, T, Eijk, M, Brakefield, PM, Beldade, P, Zwaan, BJ (2014) Ecdysteroid hormones link the juvenile environment to alternative adult life histories in a seasonal insect. Amer Nat 184: pp. 79-92 CrossRef
  40. Brakefield, PM, French, V (1995) Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the focal signal. Dev Biol 168: pp. 112-123 CrossRef
  41. Koch, PB, Merk, R, Reinhardt, R, Weber, P (2003) Localization of ecdysone receptor protein during color pattern formation in wings of the butterfly Precis coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and co-expression with Distal-less protein. Dev Genes Evol 212: pp. 571-584
  42. Beldade, P, Brakefield, PM, Long, AD (2002) Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415: pp. 315-318 CrossRef
  43. Concei莽茫o, IC, Long, AD, Gruber, JD, Beldade, P (2011) Genomic sequence around butterfly wing development genes: annotation and comparative analysis. PLoS One 6: pp. e23778 CrossRef
  44. Oliver, JC, Ramos, D, Prudic, KL, Monteiro, A (2013) Temporal gene expression variation associated with eyespot size plasticity in Bicyclus anynana. PLoS One 8: pp. e65830 CrossRef
  45. Maynard Smith, J, Burian, R, Kauffman, S, Alberch, J, Campbell, B, Goodwin, R, Lande, R, Raup, D, Wolpert, L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Quart Rev Biol 60: pp. 265-287 CrossRef
  46. Hau, M (2007) Regulation of male traits by testosterone: implications for the evolution of vertebrate life histories. Bioessays 29: pp. 133-144 CrossRef
  47. West-Eberhard, MJ (2005) Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: pp. 6543-6549 CrossRef
  48. Schindelin, J, Arganda-Carreras, I, Frise, E, Kaynig, V, Longair, M, Preibisch, S, Rueden, C, Saalfeld, S, Schmid, B, Tinevez, J, Hartenstein, V, Eliceiri, K, Tomancak, P, Cardona, A (2012) Fiji - an open source platform for biological image analysis. Nat Methods 9: pp. 676-682 CrossRef
  49. Richards, GP (1981) Insect hormones in development. Biol Rev 56: pp. 501-549 CrossRef
  50. R-Core-Team: / R - A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2012. http://www.R-project.org/.
  51. Wolfram, S (1996) Mathematica 3.0 User鈥檚 Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York
  52. Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57: pp. 289-300
  53. Efron, B, Tibshirani, RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences, general;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：1741-7007

文摘

Background The environmental regulation of development can result in the production of distinct phenotypes from the same genotype and provide the means for organisms to cope with environmental heterogeneity. The effect of the environment on developmental outcomes is typically mediated by hormonal signals which convey information about external cues to the developing tissues. While such plasticity is a wide-spread property of development, not all developing tissues are equally plastic. To understand how organisms integrate environmental input into coherent adult phenotypes, we must know how different body parts respond, independently or in concert, to external cues and to the corresponding internal signals. Results We quantified the effect of temperature and ecdysone hormone manipulations on post-growth tissue patterning in an experimental model of adaptive developmental plasticity, the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Following a suite of traits evolving by natural or sexual selection, we found that different groups of cells within the same tissue have sensitivities and patterns of response that are surprisingly distinct for the external environmental cue and for the internal hormonal signal. All but those wing traits presumably involved in mate choice responded to developmental temperature and, of those, all but the wing traits not exposed to predators responded to hormone manipulations. On the other hand, while patterns of significant response to temperature contrasted traits on autonomously-developing wings, significant response to hormone manipulations contrasted neighboring groups of cells with distinct color fates. We also showed that the spatial compartmentalization of these responses cannot be explained by the spatial or temporal compartmentalization of the hormone receptor protein. Conclusions Our results unravel the integration of different aspects of the adult phenotype into developmental and functional units which both reflect and impact evolutionary change. Importantly, our findings underscore the complexity of the interactions between environment and physiology in shaping the development of different body parts.