Toward structured peer support interventions in oncology: a qualitative insight into the experiences of gynaecological cancer survivors providing peer support

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ben Huntingdon ; Penelope Schofield ; Zahava Wolfowicz…
• 关键词：Cancer ; Oncology ; Peer support providers ; Interventions ; Qualitative research
• 刊名：Supportive Care in Cancer
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：24
• 期：2
• 页码：849-856
• 全文大小：453 KB
• 参考文献：1.Dennis CL (2003) Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 40(3):321–332PubMed CrossRef
  2.Weber BA, Roberts BL, Yarandi H, Mills TL, Chumbler NR, Wajsman Z (2007) The impact of dyadic social support on self-efficacy and depression after radical prostatectomy. J Aging Health 19(4):630–645PubMed CrossRef
  3.Lee R, Lee KS, Oh EG, Kim SH (2013) A randomized trial of dyadic peer support intervention for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Korea. Cancer Nurs 36(3):E15–E22. doi:10.​1097/​NCC.​0b013e3182642d7c​ PubMed CrossRef
  4.Pistrang N, Jay Z, Gessler S, Barker C (2012) Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: recipients’ perspectives. Psycho-Oncology 21(10):1082–1090PubMed CrossRef
  5.Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M (2008) Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 70(3):315–337PubMed CrossRef
  6.Macvean ML, White VM, Sanson-Fisher R (2008) One-to-one volunteer support programs for people with cancer: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 70(1):10–24PubMed CrossRef
  7.Giese-Davis J, Bliss-Isberg C, Carson K, Star P, Donaghy J, Cordova MJ, Stevens N, Wittenberg L, Batten C, Spiegel D (2006) The effect of peer counseling on quality of life following diagnosis of breast cancer: an observational study. Psycho-Oncology 15(11):1014–1022PubMed CrossRef
  8.Wittenberg L, Yutsis M, Taylor S, Giese-Davis J, Bliss-Isberg C, Star P, Spiegel D (2010) Marital status predicts change in distress and well-being in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and their peer counselors. Breast J 16(5):481–489. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1524-4741.​2010.​00964.​x PubMed CrossRef
  9.Pistrang N, Jay Z, Gessler S, Barker C (2013) Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: benefits and challenges for supporters. Psycho-Oncology 22(4):886–894PubMed CrossRef
  10.Chambers SK, Schover L, Halford K, Ferguson M, Gardiner R, Occhipinti S, Dunn J (2013) ProsCan for couples: a feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design. Psycho-Oncology 22(2):475–479PubMed
  11.Chambers SK, Schover L, Halford K, Clutton S, Ferguson M, Gordon L, Gardiner RA, Occhipinti S, Dunn J (2008) ProsCan for couples: randomised controlled trial of a couples-based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer who receive radical prostatectomy. BMC Cancer 8(1):226PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  12.Schofield P, Juraskova I, Bergin R, Gough K, Mileshkin L, Krishnasamy M, White K, Bernshaw D, Penberthy S, Aranda S (2013) A nurse- and peer-led support program to assist women in gynaecological oncology receiving curative radiotherapy, the PeNTAGOn study (Peer and Nurse support Trial to Assist women in Gynaecological Oncology): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 13 (39). doi: 10.​1186/​1745-6215-14-39
  13.Dunn J Efficacy of peer support interventions: summary of current knowledge. In: Clinical Oncology Society of Australia 29th Annual Scientific Meeting & International Psycho-oncology Society 14th World Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
  14.Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 13(1):117PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  15.Pistrang N, Barker C (2012) Varieties of qualitative research: a pragmatic approach to selecting methods. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ (eds) APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 5–18
  16.Braun V, Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ (eds) APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol 2: research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological and biological, vol 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
  17.Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales, 2nd edn. Psychology Foundation, Sydney
  18.Koelsch LE (2013) Reconceptualizing the member check interview. Int JQual Methods 12:168–179
  19.NVivo Qualitative Analysis Software (2012). 10 edn. QSR International Pty Ltd.
  20.Haboubi N, Lincoln N (2003) Views of health professionals on discussing sexual issues with patients. Disabil Rehabil 25(6):291–296PubMed CrossRef
  21.Gott M, Galena E, Hinchliff S, Elford H (2004) “Opening a can of worms”: GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care. Fam Pract 21(5):528–536PubMed CrossRef
  22.Bourgeois-Law G, Lotocki R (1999) Sexuality and gynaecological cancer: a needs assessment. Can J Hum Sex 8(4):231–240
  23.Juraskova I (2009) Quality of life/quality of sex: psycho-sexual adjustment following gynaecological cancer. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken
  24.Winder PA, Hiltunen EF, Sethares KA, Butzlaff A (2004) Partnerships in mending hearts: nurse and peer intervention for recovering cardiac elders. J Cardiovasc Nurs 19(3):184–191PubMed CrossRef
  25.CCNSW Cancer Connect Peer Support. http://​www.​cancercouncil.​com.​au/​26782/​get-support/​support-for-patients-family-friends/​cancer-connect-peer-support/​cancer-council-connect-ive-had-cancer-too/​ .
  
• 作者单位：Ben Huntingdon (1)
  Penelope Schofield (2) (3) (6)
  Zahava Wolfowicz (2)
  Rebecca Bergin (2)
  Donna Kabel (2)
  Jennifer Edmunds (4)
  Sylvia Penberthy (2)
  Ilona Juraskova (1) (5)
  
  1. School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building (A18), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
  2. Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  3. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  6. Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
  4. Department of Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  5. Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Oncology
  Nursing
  Nursing Management and Research
  Pain Medicine
  Rehabilitation Medicine
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1433-7339

文摘

Purpose Research into dyadic (one-to-one) peer support has predominantly focused on the recipients of peer support whilst neglecting the impact on the peer support providers (PSPs). Increasingly, structured/protocolised peer support interventions are employed. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experience of providing peer support within a protocolised intervention and how common key characteristics of such interventions (guidelines and checklists, rigorous training and partnerships with health professionals) may influence PSPs’ experiences. This research was conducted within the context of an ongoing randomised controlled trial investigating a protocolised peer support intervention (the Peer and Nurse support Trial to Assist women in Gynaecological Oncology (PeNTAGOn) study).