Uncovering the multidisciplinary nature of technology management: journal citation network analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Hakyeon Lee (1)
  
  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering ; Seoul National University of Science and Technology ; 172 Gongreung 2-dong ; Nowon-gu ; Seoul ; 139-746 ; Republic of Korea
  
• 关键词：Technology management ; Multidisciplinary ; Journal citation network ; Brokerage analysis
• 刊名：Scientometrics
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：January 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：102
• 期：1
• 页码：51-75
• 全文大小：686 KB
• 参考文献：1. Allen, T. J., & George, V. (1989). Changes in the field of R&D management over the past 20聽years. / R&D Management, / 19(2), 103鈥?13. CrossRef
  2. Allen, T. J., & Sosa, M. L. (2004). 50聽years of engineering management through the lens of the IEEE transactions. / IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, / 51(4), 391鈥?95. CrossRef
  3. Ball, D. F., & Rigby, J. (2006). Disseminating research in management of technology: Journals and authors. / R&D Management, / 36(2), 205鈥?15. CrossRef
  4. Bassecoulard, E., & Zitt, M. (1999). Indicators in a research institute: A multi-level classification of scientific journals. / Scientometrics, / 44(3), 323鈥?45. CrossRef
  5. Beyhan, B., & Cetindamar, D. (2011). No escape from the dominant theories: The analysis of intellectual pillars of technology management in developing countries. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 78(1), 103鈥?15. CrossRef
  6. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the journal of product innovation management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. / Journal of Product Innovation Management, / 24(3), 193鈥?13. CrossRef
  7. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. / Journal of Mathematical Sociology, / 2(1), 113鈥?20. CrossRef
  8. Bonacich, P., & Lloyd, P. (2001). Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. / Social Networks, / 23(3), 191鈥?01. CrossRef
  9. Borgman, C. L., & Rice, R. E. (1992). The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science, / 43(6), 397鈥?11. CrossRef
  10. B枚rner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. / Annual review of information science and technology, / 37(1), 179鈥?55. CrossRef
  11. Calero Medina, C. M., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Seed journal citation network maps: A method based on network theory. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 63(6), 1226鈥?234. CrossRef
  12. Callon, M., Coenen, R., Cohen, W., Freeman, C., Kodama, F., Meyer-Krahmer, F., et al. (1999). Retrospective evaluation (1971鈥?999). / Research Policy, / 28(9), 911鈥?19. CrossRef
  13. Carpenter, M. P., & Narin, F. (1973). Clustering of scientific journals. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science, / 24(6), 425鈥?36. CrossRef
  14. Cetindamar, D., Wasti, S. N., Ansal, H., & Beyhan, B. (2009). Does technology management research diverge or converge in developing and developed countries? / Technovation, / 29(1), 45鈥?8. CrossRef
  15. Cheng, C. H., Kumar, A., Motwani, J. G., Reisman, A., & Madan, M. S. (1999). A citation analysis of the technology innovation management journals. / IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, / 46(1), 4鈥?3. CrossRef
  16. Choi, D. G., Lee, Y.-B., Jung, M.-J., & Lee, H. (2012). National characteristics and competitiveness in MOT research: A comparative analysis of ten specialty journals, 2000鈥?009. / Technovation, / 32(1), 9鈥?8. CrossRef
  17. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. / American Journal of Sociology, 275鈥?05.
  18. Council, U. N. R. (1987). / Management of technology: The hidden competitive advantage. London: National Academy Press.
  19. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987鈥?997. / Scientometrics, / 47(1), 55鈥?3. CrossRef
  20. Drejer, A. (1997). The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. / Technovation, / 17(5), 253鈥?65. CrossRef
  21. Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984鈥?004. / Journal of Product Innovation Management, / 27(3), 437鈥?51. CrossRef
  22. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. / Social Networks, / 1(3), 215鈥?39. CrossRef
  23. Gould, R. V. (1987). Measures of betweenness in non-symmetric networks. / Social Networks, / 9(3), 277鈥?82. CrossRef
  24. Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. / Sociological methodology, 89鈥?26.
  25. King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. / Journal of Information Science, / 13(5), 261鈥?76. CrossRef
  26. Leydesdorff, L. (1994). The generation of aggregated journal鈥搄ournal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. / Scientometrics, / 31(1), 59鈥?4. CrossRef
  27. Leydesdorff, L. (2007a). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 58(9), 1303鈥?319. CrossRef
  28. Leydesdorff, L. (2007b). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 58(1), 25鈥?8. CrossRef
  29. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. / Scientometrics, / 70(3), 693鈥?13. CrossRef
  30. Liker, J. (1996). Results of survey of management journals for TIM research. / TIM Newsletter, / 7(2), 5鈥?.
  31. Linstone, H. A. (1999). TFSC: 1969鈥?999. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 62(1), 1鈥?. CrossRef
  32. Linton, J. D., & Embrechts, M. (2007). MOT TIM journal rankings 2006. / Technovation, / 27(3), 91鈥?4. CrossRef
  33. Linton, J. D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2004). Perspective: Ranking the technology innovation management journals. / Journal of Product Innovation Management, / 21(2), 123鈥?39. CrossRef
  34. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. / Scientometrics, / 36(3), 435鈥?44. CrossRef
  35. Marsden, P. V. (1982). Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks. / Social structure and network analysis, / 7(4), 341鈥?10.
  36. Marsden, P. V. (1983). Restricted access in networks and models of power. / American Journal of Sociology, / 88(4), 686鈥?17. CrossRef
  37. McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science, / 42(4), 290鈥?96. CrossRef
  38. McCain, K. W. (1998). Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. / Scientometrics, / 41(3), 389鈥?10. CrossRef
  39. McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D Management. / R&D Management, / 38(1), 69鈥?3. CrossRef
  40. Merino, M. T. G., do Carmo, M. L. P., & 脕lvarez, M. V. S. (2006). 25 years of technovation: Characterisation and evolution of the journal. / Technovation, / 26(12), 1303鈥?316. CrossRef
  41. Nambisan, S., & Wilemon, D. (2003). A global study of graduate management of technology programs. / Technovation, / 23(12), 949鈥?62. CrossRef
  42. Narin, F., Carpenter, M., & Berlt, N. C. (1972). Interrelationships of scientific journals. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science, / 23(5), 323鈥?31. CrossRef
  43. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (2000). The development of science indicators in the United States. In: Cronin, B. & Atkins, H. B. ASIS Monograph Series / The Web of Knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. New Jersey: Information Today Inc.
  44. Noyons, E. C. M. (2001). Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context. / Scientometrics, / 50(1), 83鈥?8. CrossRef
  45. Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. / Journal of Information Science, / 28(6), 441鈥?53. CrossRef
  46. Pilkington, A. 2007. Engineering management or management of technology? A bibliometric study of IEEE TEM. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, (pp. 2106鈥?109): IEEE.
  47. Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships. / Technovation, / 26(3), 288鈥?99. CrossRef
  48. Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 53(13), 1113鈥?119. CrossRef
  49. Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O鈥橦are, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management. / Research Policy, / 41(7), 1262鈥?282. CrossRef
  50. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. / Scientometrics, / 82(2), 263鈥?87. CrossRef
  51. Ramos-Rodr铆guez, A. R., & Ru铆z-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980鈥?000. / Strategic Management Journal, / 25(10), 981鈥?004. CrossRef
  52. Reeves, B., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. / Human Communication Research, / 10(1), 119鈥?36. CrossRef
  53. Scott, J. (1991). / Social network analysis: A handbook. London: SAGE Publications.
  54. Thongpapanl, N. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. / Technovation, / 32(5), 257鈥?71. CrossRef
  55. Tsay, M.-Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C.-W. (2003). Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. / Scientometrics, / 57(1), 7鈥?5. CrossRef
  56. van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. / Research Evaluation, / 9(3), 183鈥?87. CrossRef
  57. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 59(4), 565鈥?76. CrossRef
  58. van Raan, A. F. J., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research. / Research Policy, / 31(4), 611鈥?32. CrossRef
  59. Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., et al. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. / Journal of Informetrics, / 5(1), 14鈥?6. CrossRef
  60. Wasserman, S. (1994). / Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
  61. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. / Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST), / 32, 99鈥?68.
  62. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2007). The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics. / Scientometrics, / 72(2), 185鈥?00. CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Information Storage and Retrieval; Library Science; Interdisciplinary Studies;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1588-2861

文摘

Technology management (TM) is multidisciplinary in nature. This paper investigates the multidisciplinary characteristics of TM through journal citation network analysis. The TM network composed of ten TM specialty journals and relevant journals of other disciplines is constructed based on their citation relationships. In particular, the relatedness index is employed to capture the citation relationships between journals with consideration of different journal sizes. Scrutinizing the network reveals what disciplines have contributed to TM and to what disciplines TM has contributed. The role of TM journals in exchanging knowledge with other disciplines is also identified by using brokerage analysis. TM is shown to have a high degree of interaction with six disciplines: Business and Management, Marketing, Economics, Planning and Development, Information Science, and Industrial Engineering and Operations Research. It is shown that visualizing and analyzing the TM network can provide an excellent overview of its multidisciplinary structure in terms of knowledge flow. This can help TM researchers easily grasp the historical development and fundamental features of TM.