Lesson learned from adaptation response to Devils Lake flooding in North Dakota, USA

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Haochi Zheng (1)
  David Barta (2)
  Xiaodong Zhang (1)
  
• 关键词：Devils lake ; Flooding ; Adaptation ; Risk management ; Perception ; Climate change
• 刊名：Regional Environmental Change
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：February 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：14
• 期：1
• 页码：185-194
• 全文大小：1,006 KB
• 作者单位：Haochi Zheng (1)
  David Barta (2)
  Xiaodong Zhang (1)
  
  1. Department of Earth System Science and Policy, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA
  2. U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C St. NW, Washington, DC, 20240, USA
  
• ISSN：1436-378X

文摘

The water level of Devils Lake, a terminal lake in the northeast of North Dakota, U.S., has risen nearly 10?m since 1993, inundating farm land and causing significant damages to the infrastructure and surrounding communities. The currently adopted flood adaptation policy is continuing infrastructural protection (CIP), under which the infrastructure, such as levees or roads, is raised gradually in response to the rising water. Since the Devils Lake city and the adjacent communities are built within the historical confines of the lake, we introduce and estimate potential costs of two diametrical, but long-term targeted adaptation strategies involving either buyout or relocation (B/R) to contrast against the CIP. The comparison shows that B/R, while more expensive initially, would be cheaper than CIP accumulated over longer term. We further explore the reason that policymakers prefer CIP: the near-term uncertainty regarding the future lake levels has led to significant discount of long-term potential risk. With future risk significantly discounted, not only B/R, but any other alternatives that feature long-term perspective, could become less attractive than CIP. Were we able to predict the flooding more accurately or willing to discount future less, we might have chosen a different plan of action. The ultimate choice of CIP among the possible adaptation options reveals that policymakers have privileged the present and favored near-term remedies instead of long-term solutions. Although certainly not on the same scale, the lesson we have learned in dealing with Devils Lake has far-reaching implications on climate change adaptation strategies. The passive decision to wait and ignore the full potential for disaster ultimately leaves us with no other option, but to continue to “wait and see-and then spend more.