Relationship between magnetic properties and heavy metals of urban soils with different soil types and environmental settings: implications for magnetic mapping

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Tao Yang (1) yangtao@cea-igp.ac.cn
  Qingsheng Liu (2)
  Qingli Zeng (2)
  Lungsang Chan (3)
• 关键词：Urban soil &#8211 ; Magnetic susceptibility &#8211 ; Heavy metal pollution
• 刊名：Environmental Earth Sciences
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：May 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：66
• 期：2
• 页码：409-420
• 全文大小：599.4 KB
• 参考文献：1. Angulo E (1996) The Tomlinson pollution load index applied to heavy metal “Mussel-Watch” data: a useful index to assess coastal pollution. Sci Total Environ 187:19–56
  2. Bijaksana S, Huliselan EK (2010) Magnetic properties and heavy metal content of sanitary leachate sludge in two landfill sites near Bandung, Indonesia. Environ Earth Sci 60:409–419
  3. Blaha U, Appel E, Stanjek H (2008a) Determination of anthropogenic boundary depth in industrially polluted soil and semi-quantification of heavy metal loads using magnetic susceptibility. Environ Pollut 156:278–289
  4. Blaha U, Sapkota B, Appel E, Stanjek H, R枚sler W (2008b) Micro-scale grain-size analysis and magnetic properties of coal-fired power plant fly ash and its relevance for environmental magnetic pollution studies. Atmos Environ 42:8359–8370
  5. Blundell A, Hannam JA, Dearing JA, Boyle JF (2009) Detecting atmospheric pollution in surface soils using magnetic measurements: a reappraisal using an England and Wales database. Environ Pollut 157:2878–2890
  6. Boyko T, Scholger R, Stanjek H, MAGPROX Team (2004) Topsoil magnetic susceptibility mapping as a tool for pollution monitoring: repeatability of in situ measurements. J Appl Geophys 55:249–259
  7. Bućko MS, Magiera T, Pesonen LJ, Janus B (2010) Magnetic, geochemical, and microstructural characteristics of road dust on roadsides with different traffic volumes: case study from Finland. Water Air Soil Pollut 209:295–306
  8. Chaparro MAE, Sinito AM, Ramasamy V, Marinelli C, Chaparro MAE, Mullainathan S, Murugesan S (2008) Magnetic measurements and pollutants of sediments from Cauvery and Palaru River, India. Environ Geol 56:425–437
  9. Chaparro MAE, Chaparro MAE, Rajkumar P, Ramasamy V, Sinito AM (2011) Magnetic parameters, trace elements, and multivariate statistical studies of river sediments from southeastern India: a case study from the Vellar River. Environ Earth Sci 63:297–310
  10. China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) (1990) The background concentrations of soil elements in China. Chinese Environment Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
  11. Dearing JA, Hay KL, Baban SMJ, Huddleston AS, Wellington EMH, Loveland PJ (1996) Magnetic susceptibility of soil: an evaluation of conflicting theories using a national data set. Geophys J Int 127:728–734
  12. Dunlop DJ, 脰zdemir 脰 (1997) Rock magnetism: fundamentals and frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  13. Fialov谩 H, Maier G, Petrovsk媒 E, Kapička A, Boyko T, Scholger R, MAGPROX Team (2006) Magnetic properties of soils from sites with different geological and environmental settings. J Appl Geophys 59:273–283
  14. Grimley DA, Arruda NK, Bramstedt MW (2004) Using magnetic susceptibility to facilitate more rapid, reproducible and precise delineation of hydric soils in the Midwestern USA. Catena 58:183–213
  15. Hanesch M, Scholger R (2002) Monitoring of heavy metals loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Environ Geol 42:857–870
  16. Hanesch M, Scholger R, Dekkers MJ (2001) The application of fuzzy C-means cluster analysis and non-linear mapping to a soil data set for the detection of polluted sites. Phys Chem Earth 26:885–891
  17. Hanesch M, Rantitsch G, Hemetsberger S, Scholger R (2007) Lithological and pedological influences on the magnetic susceptibility of soil: their consideration in magnetic pollution mapping. Sci Total Environ 382:351–363
  18. Hay KL, Dearing JA, Baban SMJ, Loveland P (1997) A preliminary attempt to identify atmospherically-derived pollution particles in English topsoils from magnetic susceptibility measurements. Phys Chem Earth 22:207–210
  19. Hoffmann V, Knab M, Appel E (1999) Magnetic susceptibility mapping of roadside pollution. J Geochem Explor 66:313–326
  20. Hu XF, Su Y, Ye R, Li XQ, Zhang GL (2007) Magnetic properties of the urban soils in Shanghai and their environmental implications. Catena 70:428–436
  21. Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Hoffmann V (2006) Magnetic mineralogy and grain-size dependence of hysteresis parameters of single spherules from industrial waste products. Phys Earth Planet Inter 154:255–265
  22. Jordanova N, Jordanova D, Tsacheva T (2008) Application of magnetometry for delineation of anthropogenic pollution in areas covered by various soil types. Geoderma 144:557–571
  23. Kapička A, Jordanova N, Petrovsk媒 E, Ustjak S (2001) Effect of different soil conditions on magnetic parameters of power-plant fly ashes. J Appl Geophys 48:93–102
  24. Kapička A, Jordanova N, Petrovsk媒 E, Podrazsky V (2003) Magnetic study of weakly contaminated forest soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 148:31–44
  25. Kapička A, Petrovsk媒 E, Fialov谩 H, Podr谩zsk媒 V, Dvoř谩k I (2008) High resolution mapping of anthropogenic pollution in the Giant Mountains National Park using soil magnetometry. Stud Geophys Geod 52:271–284
  26. King J, Banerjee SK, Marvin J, 脰zdemir 脰 (1982) A comparison of different magnetic methods for determining the relative grain size of magnetite in natural materials: Some results from lake sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett 59:404–419
  27. Liu QS, Deng CL, Yu YJ, Torrent J, Banerjee SK, Zhu RX (2005) Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility in an argon environment: implications for pedogenesis of Chinese loess/paleosols. Geophys J Int 161:102–112
  28. Lu SG, Wang HY, Bai SQ (2009) Heavy metal contents and magnetic susceptibility of soils along an urban–rural gradient in rapidly growing city of eastern China. Environ Monit Assess 155:91–101
  29. Magiera T, Strzyszcz Z (2000) Ferrimagnetic minerals of anthropogenic origin in soils of some Polish national parks. Water Air Soil Pollut 124:37–48
  30. Magiera T, Strzyszcz Z, Kapička A, Petrovsk媒 E, MAGPROX Team (2006) Discrimination of lithogenic and anthropogenic influences on topsoil magnetic susceptibility in Central Europe. Geoderma 130:299–311
  31. Magiera T, Kapička A, Petrovsk媒 E, Strzyszcz Z, Fialov谩 H, Rachwał M (2008) Magnetic anomalies of forest soils in the upper Silesia-Northern Moravia region. Environ Pollut 156:618–627
  32. Maher BA (1998) Magnetic properties of modern soils and quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl Palaeoecol 137:25–54
  33. Petrovsk媒 E, Alcal谩 MD, Criado JM, Grygar T, Kapička A, Šubrt J (2000a) Magnetic properties of magnetite prepared by ball-milling of hematite with iron. J Magn Magn Mater 210:257–273
  34. Petrovsk媒 E, Kapička A, Jordanova N, Knab M, Hoffman V (2000b) Low-field magnetic susceptibility: a proxy method of estimating increased pollution of different environment systems. Environ Geol 39:312–318
  35. Schmidt A, Yarnold R, Hill M, Ashmore M (2005) Magnetic susceptibility as proxy for heavy metal pollution: a site study. J Geochem Explor 85:109–117
  36. Spiteri C, Kalinski V, Rosler W, Hoffmann V, Appel E, MAGPROX Team (2005) Magnetic screening of a pollution hotspot in the Lausitz area, Eastern Germany: correlation analysis between magnetic proxies and heavy metal contamination in soils. Environ Geol 49:1–9
  37. Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental magnetism. Allen and Unwin, London
  38. Veneva L, Hoffmann V, Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Th Fehr (2004) Rock magnetic, mineralogical and microstructural characterization of fly ashes from Bulgarian power plants and the nearby anthropogenic soils. Phys Chem Earth 29:1011–1023
  39. Versteeg JK, Morris WA, Rukavina NA (1995) The utility of magnetic properties as a proxy for mapping contamination in Hamilton Harbor sediments. J Great Lakes Res 21:71–83
  40. Williams M (1992) Evidence for the dissolution of magnetite in recent Scottish peats. Quater Res 37:171–182
  41. Yang T, Liu QS, Chan LS, Cao GD (2007) Magnetic investigation of heavy metals contamination in urban topsoils around the East Lake, Wuhan, China. Geophys J Int 171:603–612
  42. Yang T, Liu QS, Zeng QL, Chan LS (2009) Environmental magnetic responses of urbanization processes: evidence from lake sediments in East Lake, Wuhan, China. Geophys J Int 179:873–886
  43. Zawadzki J, Fabijańczyk P, Magiera T, Strzyszcz Z (2010) Study of litter influence on magnetic susceptibility measurements of urban forest topsoils using the MS2D sensor. Environ Earth Sci 61:223–230
• 作者单位：1. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, 100081 China2. Department of Geophysics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074 China3. Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：None Assigned
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1866-6299

文摘

Two types of soil (fluvisols and anthrosols) were collected from different environmental settings (suburb and industrial area) in Wuhan, central China, aiming to examine the applicability of magnetic mapping for heavy metal pollution of urban soil in a large region. Magnetic measurements and chemical analysis indicated elevated magnetization and heavy metal concentrations of topsoils in the industrial area. Magnetic susceptibility (χ), anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) and saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM) of fluvisols are much higher than those of anthrosols, but contrary for frequency-dependent susceptibility, indicating that soil magnetism strongly depends on the soil type/condition. Predominant magnetic carrier in topsoils in industrial area is pseudo-single-domain/multi-domain magnetite. Environmental scanning electron microscope/energy dispersive X-ray examination of the magnetic extracts from these topsoils revealed abundant spherical particles with diameters of 10–50 μm that are rich in iron-oxides, and could be attributed to the nearby industrial activities (e.g., steel work and power generation). Significant correlations were observed between magnetic concentration-related parameters (e.g., χ, ARM and SIRM) and concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn, Hg and Tomlinson pollution load index. These results proposed that magnetic proxy mapping of soil pollution is an effective, fast and inexpensive tool for delineation of heavy metal pollution. However, interpretation of magnetic properties for such a purpose must be done on a site-specific basis, taking into account the possibilities of pedogenic enhancement/depletion under the specific soil conditions.