A progress report on the ongoing Heidegger reception

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Tom Rockmore
• 刊名：Studies in East European Thought
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：68
• 期：2-3
• 页码：229-239
• 全文大小：350 KB
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Philosophy
  Political Philosophy
  History
  Philosophy
  Political Science
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-0948
• 卷排序：68

文摘

Philosophy, which does not begin again, always unfolds against the background of the ongoing philosophical tradition, which it needs to interpret. I argue that Heidegger’s theories, like all philosophical theories, can neither be reduced to, nor separated from, the historical context. In that sense they are like all other philosophical views, perhaps in theory ahistorical but in practice historical, hence always bound up with and inseparable from their historical moment. If, as I believe, Heidegger’s theories led him in part toward National Socialism, there is no alternative, if philosophy is to survive in a meaningful sense, to rejecting those aspects of his position, which must now be considered as simply and wholly dead, in favor of other aspects of Heidegger’s thinking that, if they are still living, can possibly be saved.KeywordsHeideggerNational Socialismthe Heidegger ReceptionBeing and TimeSchwarze Hefte (The Black Notebooks)