Pharmacokinetics for once-daily modified release formulation of tacrolimus hydrate in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Shingo Yano ; Shinichiro Mori ; Takeshi Saito ; Hiroki Yokoyama…
  • 关键词:Once ; daily tacrolimus ; Pharmacokinetics ; Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ; GVHD
  • 刊名:Annals of Hematology
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:March 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:94
  • 期:3
  • 页码:491-496
  • 全文大小:330 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T et al (2008) Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transplant Proc 40:1362-365 CrossRef
    2. First MR (2008) First clinical experience with the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus. Ther Drug Monit 30:159-66 CrossRef
    3. Comuzzi C, Lorenzin D, Rossetto A et al (2010) Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 42:1320-321 CrossRef
    4. van Hooff JP, Alloway RR, Trune?ka P, Mourad M (2011) Four-year experience with tacrolimus once-daily prolonged release in patients from phase II conversion and de novo kidney, liver, and heart studies. Clin Transplant 25:E1–E12 CrossRef
    5. Kr?mer BK, Charpentier B, B?ckman L et al (2010) Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study. Am J Transplant 10:2632-643 CrossRef
    6. Trune?ka P, Boillot O, Seehofer D et al (2010) Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (PROGRAF) in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:2313-323 CrossRef
    7. Crespo M, Mir M, Marin M et al (2009) De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels. Transplant Proc 41:2115-117 CrossRef
    8. Hougardy JM, Broeders N, Kianda M et al (2011) Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients results in sustained decrease in tacrolimus exposure. Transplantation 91:566-69 CrossRef
    9. Jelassi ML, Lefeuvre S, Karras A, Moulonguet L, Billaud EM (2011) Therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant receiving the modified-release once-daily tacrolimus. Transplant Proc 43:491-94 CrossRef
    10. Wu MJ, Cheng CY, Chen CH et al (2011) Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from prograf to advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 92:648-52 CrossRef
    11. Yanada M, Emi N, Naoe T et al (2004) Tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease improves outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, but not from HLA-identical sibling donors: a nationwide survey conducted in Japan. Bone Marrow Transplant 34:331-37 CrossRef
    12. Perkins J, Field T, Kim J et al (2010) A randomized phase II trial comparing tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus and methotrexate for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:937-47 CrossRef
    13. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P et al (1995) 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 15:825-28
    14. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR-for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452-58 CrossRef
    15. Osunkwo I, Bessmertny O, Harrison L et al (2004) A pilot study of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in childhood and adolescent allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 10:246-58
文摘
A once-daily modified release formulation of oral tacrolimus (Tac QD) has been developed in response to the problem of nonadherence. However, there have been no data available about the efficacy of Tac QD conversion from intravenous Tac (Tac i.v.) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We analyzed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Tac QD in allo-SCT recipients. A total of 10 patients with hematological malignancies who received allo-SCT from unrelated donors were enrolled. Patients received Tac i.v. at 0.03?mg/kg a day before transplantation. Administration of Tac i.v. was converted to Tac QD at a 1:4 ratio when the patients had recovered from regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicity and could tolerate oral medication. After conversion, six out of 10 patients (60?%) showed a sustained decrease in Tac exposure and required dose adjustment. The conversion from Tac i.v. to Tac QD should be performed under close medical supervision. Area under the curve (AUC) and the trough of Tac QD showed a correlation, and the trough should be maintained above 7.5?ng/ml to provide an adequate AUC. Although four patients received bone marrow from an HLA DRB1 1 antigen-mismatched unrelated donor, no patients developed grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The modification of Tac QD to maintain a whole-blood trough concentration above 7.5?ng/ml may be as effective as Tac BID.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700