Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kenji J. Tsuchiya (1) (2)
  Kaori Matsumoto (2)
  Atsuko Yagi (3) (4)
  Naoko Inada (5)
  Miho Kuroda (5) (6) (7)
  Eiko Inokuchi (5)
  Tomonori Koyama (5) (8)
  Yoko Kamio (5)
  Masatsugu Tsujii (1) (2) (9)
  Saeko Sakai (10) (11)
  Ikuko Mohri (10) (11)
  Masako Taniike (10) (11)
  Ryoichiro Iwanaga (12)
  Kei Ogasahara (13)
  Taishi Miyachi (14)
  Shunji Nakajima (2)
  Iori Tani (15) (2)
  Masafumi Ohnishi (2)
  Masahiko Inoue (16)
  Kazuyo Nomura (16) (17)
  Taku Hagiwara (18)
  Tokio Uchiyama (19)
  Hironobu Ichikawa (20)
  Shuji Kobayashi (21)
  Ken Miyamoto (21)
  Kazuhiko Nakamura (3)
  Katsuaki Suzuki (1) (2)
  Norio Mori (1) (2) (3)
  Nori Takei (1) (2) (22)
  
• 关键词：Autism ; ADI ; R ; Reliability ; Validity ; Japan
• 刊名：Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：March 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：43
• 期：3
• 页码：643-662
• 全文大小：258KB
• 参考文献：1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). / Task force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., Scott, F. J., Allison, C., Williams, J., Bolton, P., Matthews, F. E., et al. (2009). Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. / British Journal of Psychiatry, / 194, 500-09. CrossRef
  3. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. / Psychological Assessment, / 6, 284-90. CrossRef
  4. Cicchetti, D. V., Lord, C., Koenig, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2008). Reliability of the ADI-R: Multiple examiners evaluate a single case. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 38, 764-70. CrossRef
  5. Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. / American Journal of Mental Deficiency, / 86, 127-37.
  6. Cicchetti, D. V., Volkmar, F., Klin, A., & Showalter, D. (1995). Diagnosing autism using ICD-10 criteria: a comparison of neural networks and standard multivariate procedures. / Child Neuropsychology, / 1, 26-7. CrossRef
  7. Cox, A., Klein, K., Charman, T., Baird, G., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., et al. (1999). Autism spectrum disorders at 20 and 42?months of age: stability of clinical and ADI-R diagnosis. / Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, / 40, 719-32. CrossRef
  8. de Bildt, A., Sytema, S., Ketelaars, C., Kraijer, D., Mulder, E., Volkmar, F., et al. (2004). Interrelationship between autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic (ADOS-G), autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R), and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR) classification in children and adolescents with mental retardation. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 34, 129-37. CrossRef
  9. Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. / Educational and Psychological Measurements, / 33, 613-19. CrossRef
  10. Fombonne, E. (2009). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. / Pediatric Research, / 65, 591-98. CrossRef
  11. Gilchrist, A., Green, J., Cox, A., Burton, D., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (2001). Development and current functioning in adolescents with Asperger syndrome: a comparative study. / Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, / 42, 227-40. CrossRef
  12. Gray, K. M., Tonge, B. J., & Sweeney, D. J. (2008). Using the autism diagnostic interview-revised and the autism diagnostic observation schedule with young children with developmental delay: Evaluating diagnostic validity. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 38, 657-67. CrossRef
  13. Hill, A., Bolte, S., Petrova, G., Beltcheva, D., Tacheva, S., & Poustka, F. (2001). Stability and interpersonal agreement of the interview-based diagnosis of autism. / Psychopathology, / 34, 187-91. CrossRef
  14. International Molecular Genetic Study of Autism Consortium. (2001). A genomewide screen for autism: Strong evidence for linkage to chromosomes 2q, 7q, and 16p. / American Journal of Human Genetics, / 69, 570-81. CrossRef
  15. Kawamura, Y., Takahashi, O., & Ishii, T. (2008). Reevaluating the incidence of pervasive developmental disorders: impact of elevated rates of detection through implementation of an integrated system of screening in Toyota, Japan. / Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, / 62, 152-59. CrossRef
  16. Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B. L., Koh, Y. J., Fombonne, E., Laska, E., Lim, E. C., et al. (2011). Prevalence of autism spectrum sisorders in a total population ample. / American Journal of Psychiatry, / 168, 904-12. CrossRef
  17. Kim, S. H., & Lord, C. (2012). New autism diagnostic interview-revised algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers from 12 to 47?months of age. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 42, 82-3. CrossRef
  18. Ko?ovská, E., Biskupst?, R., Carina Gillberg, I., Ellefsen, A., Kampmann, H., Stora, T., et al. (2012). The rising prevalence of autism: A prospective longitudinal study in the Faroe Islands. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder,. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1444-9 .
  19. Koyama, T., Osada, H., Tsujii, H., & Kurita, H. (2009). Utility of the Kyoto scale of psychological development in cognitive assessment of children with pervasive developmental disorders. / Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, / 63, 241-43. CrossRef
  20. Lampi, K. M., Sourander, A., Gissler, M., Niemela, S., Rehnstrom, K., Pulkkinen, E., et al. (2010). Validity of finnish registry-based diagnoses of autism with the ADI-R. / Acta Paediatrica, / 99, 1425-428. CrossRef
  21. Le Couteur, A., Haden, G., Hammal, D., & McConachie, H. (2008). Diagnosing autism spectrum disorders in pre-school children using two standardised assessment instruments: The ADI-R and the ADOS. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 38, 362-72. CrossRef
  22. Lord, C., & Jones, R. M. (2012). Annual research review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. / Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, / 53, 490-09. CrossRef
  23. Lord, C., Risi, S., DiLavore, P. S., Shulman, C., Thurm, A., & Pickles, A. (2006). Autism from 2 to 9?years of age. / Archives of General Psychiatry, / 63, 694-01. CrossRef
  24. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 30, 205-23. CrossRef
  25. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 24, 659-85. CrossRef
  26. Lord, C., Storoschuk, S., Rutter, M., & Pickles, A. (1993). Using the ADI-R to diagnose autism in preschool children. / Infant Mental Health Journal, / 14, 234-52. CrossRef
  27. McGovern, C. W., & Sigman, M. (2005). Continuity and change from early childhood to adolescence in autism. / Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, / 46, 401-08. CrossRef
  28. Mildenberger, K., Sitter, S., Noterdaeme, M., & Amorosa, H. (2001). The use of the ADI-R as a diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of children with infantile autism and children with a receptive language disorder. / European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, / 10, 248-55. CrossRef
  29. Parner, E. T., Schendel, D. E., & Thorsen, P. (2008). Autism prevalence trends over time in Denmark: Changes in prevalence and age at diagnosis. / Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, / 162, 1150-156. CrossRef
  30. Risi, S., Lord, C., Gotham, K., Corsello, C., Chrysler, C., Szatmari, P., et al. (2006). Combining information from multiple sources in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. / Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, / 45, 1094-103. CrossRef
  31. Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). / ADI-R: Autism diagnostic interview revised. WPS edition manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  32. Saemundsen, E., Magnússon, P., Smári, J., & Sigurdardóttir, S. (2003). Autism diagnostic interview-revised and the childhood autism rating scale: Convergence and discrepancy in diagnosing autism. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 33, 319-28. CrossRef
  33. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). / Vineland adaptive behavior scales (VABS). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  34. Tanaka Institute of Education. (1987). / Tanaka-Binet intelligence scale. Tokyo: Taken Publisher.
  35. Tomanik, S. S., Pearson, D. A., Loveland, K. A., Lane, D. M., & Bryant Shaw, J. (2007). Improving the reliability of autism diagnoses: Examining the utility of adaptive behavior. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 37, 921-28. CrossRef
  36. Turner, L. M., & Stone, W. L. (2007). Variability in outcome for children with an ASD diagnosis at age 2. / Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, / 48, 793-02. CrossRef
  37. Ventola, P. E., Kleinman, J., Pandey, J., Barton, M., Allen, S., Green, J., et al. (2006). Agreement among four diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorders in toddlers. / Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, / 36, 839-47. CrossRef
  38. Waterhouse, L. (2008). Autism overflows: Increasing prevalence and proliferating theories. / Neuropsychology Review, / 18, 273-86. CrossRef
  39. Wechsler, D., Golombok, S., & Rust, J. (1992). / Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Third edition (WISC-IIIUK). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.
  40. Williams, J. G., Higgins, J. P., & Brayne, C. E. (2006). Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders. / Archives of Disease in Childhood, / 91, 8-5. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Kenji J. Tsuchiya (1) (2)
  Kaori Matsumoto (2)
  Atsuko Yagi (3) (4)
  Naoko Inada (5)
  Miho Kuroda (5) (6) (7)
  Eiko Inokuchi (5)
  Tomonori Koyama (5) (8)
  Yoko Kamio (5)
  Masatsugu Tsujii (1) (2) (9)
  Saeko Sakai (10) (11)
  Ikuko Mohri (10) (11)
  Masako Taniike (10) (11)
  Ryoichiro Iwanaga (12)
  Kei Ogasahara (13)
  Taishi Miyachi (14)
  Shunji Nakajima (2)
  Iori Tani (15) (2)
  Masafumi Ohnishi (2)
  Masahiko Inoue (16)
  Kazuyo Nomura (16) (17)
  Taku Hagiwara (18)
  Tokio Uchiyama (19)
  Hironobu Ichikawa (20)
  Shuji Kobayashi (21)
  Ken Miyamoto (21)
  Kazuhiko Nakamura (3)
  Katsuaki Suzuki (1) (2)
  Norio Mori (1) (2) (3)
  Nori Takei (1) (2) (22)
  
  1. Department of Child Development, United Graduate School of Child Development at Hamamatsu, Handayama 1 Higashiku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
  2. Research Center for Child Mental Development, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Handayama 1 Higashiku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
  3. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Handayama 1 Higashiku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
  4. Shizuoka Center for Child and Family Welfare, Shizuoka, Japan
  5. Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
  6. Department of Psychology, Shukutoku University, Chiba, Japan
  7. Department of Child Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  8. Kokeijuku Preparatory School, Kumamoto, Japan
  9. Chukyo University School of Contemporary Sociology, Toyota, Japan
  10. Division of Developmental Neuroscience, United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  11. Research Center for Child Mental Development, United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  12. Division of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
  13. Comprehensive Educational Science Division, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan
  14. Department of Pediatrics, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  15. Faculty of Humanities, Tokai Gakuen University, Aichi, Japan
  16. Graduate School of Medical Science, Center for Clinical Psychology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Tottori, Japan
  17. Department of Child Psychiatry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Handayama 1 Higashiku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
  18. Division of Special Education, Department of Education and Development, Hokkaido University of Education, Asahikawa, Japan
  19. Faculty of Human Development and Culture, Fukushima University, Fukushima, Japan
  20. Tokyo Metropolitan Children’s Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
  21. Department of Pediatrics, Kosai City Hospital, Kosai, Japan
  22. King’s College of London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
  
• ISSN：1573-3432

文摘

To examine the inter-rater reliability of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version (ADI-R-JV), the authors recruited 51 individuals aged 3-9?years, interviewed by two independent raters. Subsequently, to assess the discriminant and diagnostic validity of ADI-R-JV, the authors investigated 317 individuals aged 2-9?years, who were divided into three diagnostic groups as follows: autistic disorder (AD), pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, and other psychiatric diagnosis or no diagnosis, according to the consensus clinical diagnosis. As regards inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients of greater than 0.80 were obtained for all three domains of ADI-R-JV. As regards discriminant validity, the mean scores of the three domains was significantly higher in individuals with AD than in those of other diagnostic groups. As regards diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity for correctly diagnosing AD were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively, but sensitivity was 0.55 for individuals younger than 5?years. Specificity was consistently high regardless of age and intelligence. ADI-R-JV was shown to be a reliable tool, and has sufficient discriminant validity and satisfactory diagnostic validity for correctly diagnosing AD, although the diagnostic validity appeared to be compromised with respect to the diagnosis of younger individuals.