参考文献:Antoniadou E, Kouluvatianos C, Mirman LJ (2013) Strategic exploitation of a common-property resource under uncertainty. J Environ Econ Manag 65(1):28–39CrossRef Asche F (2001) Fishermen’s discount rates in ITQ systems. Environ Resour Econ 19:403–410 Arnason R (1996) On the ITQ fisheries management system in Iceland. Rev Fish Biol Fish 6:63–90CrossRef Bailey M, Rashid Sumaila U, Lindroos M (2010) Application of game theory to fisheries over three decades. Fish Res 102(1–2):1–8CrossRef Breton M, Keoula MY (2014) A great fish war model with asymmetric players. Ecol Econ 97:209–223CrossRef Churchill R, Owen D (2010) The EC common fisheries policy, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Clark CW (1990) Mathematical Bioeconomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York Costello C, Gaines SD, Iynham J (2008) Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science 321:1678–1681 Daw T, Gray T (2005) Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: a study of failure in the European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy. Mar Policy 29:189–197CrossRef Delaney AE, Hastie JE (2007) Lost in translation: differences in role identities between fisheries scientists and managers. Ocean Coast Manag 50:661–682CrossRef European Commission (2009) Green paper on the reform of the common fisheries policy FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Franchino F, Rahming A (2003) Biased ministers, inefficiency and control in distributive policies: an application to the EU fisheries policy. Eur Union Polit 4:11–36CrossRef Froese R (2011) Fishery reform slips through the net. Nature 475:7 Froese R, Branch T, Proelss A, Quaas M, Sainsbury K, Zimmermann C (2011) Generic harvest control rules for European fisheries. Fish Fish 12:340–351CrossRef Gordon H (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62:124–142CrossRef Hilborn R (2007) Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar Policy 31:153–158CrossRef Homans FR, Wilen JE (1997) A model of regulated open access resource use. Environ Econ Manag 32:1–21CrossRef Kapaun U, Quaas M (2013) Does the optimal size of a fish stock increase with environmental uncertainties? Environ Resour Econ 54(2):293–310CrossRef Khalilian S, Froese R, Proelss A, Requate T (2010) Designed for failure: a critique of the common fisheries policy of the European Union. Mar Policy 34:1178–1182CrossRef Kronbak L, Lindroos M (2006) An enforcement-coalition model: fishermen and authorities forming coalitions. Environ Resour Econ 35(3):169–194CrossRef Kydland F, Prescott E (1977) Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. J Polit Econ 85:473–492CrossRef Leal C, Quinones R, Chavéz C (2010) What factors affect the decision making process when setting TACs?: the case of Chilean fisheries. Mar Policy 34:1183–1195CrossRef Levhari D, Mirman LJ (1980) The great fish war: An example using a dynamic Cournot–Nash solution. Bell J Econ 11(1):322–334CrossRef Lock K, Leslie S (2007) New Zealand’s quota management system: a history of the first 20 years. Motu Working Paper No. 07-02 Mardle S, Pascoe S (2002) Modelling the effects of trade-offs between long and short-term objectives in fisheries management. J Environ Manag 65:49–62CrossRef Munro G (1979) The optimal management of transboundary renewable resources. Can J Econ 12(3):355–376CrossRef Newell RG, Sanchirico JN, Kerr S (2005) Fishing quota market. Environ Econ Manag 49:437–462CrossRef Quaas M, Froese R, Herwartz H, Requate T, Schmidt J, Voss R (2012) Fishing industry borrows from natural capital at high shadow interest rates. Ecol Econ 82:45–52CrossRef Okey TA (2003) Membership of the eight Regional Fishery Management Councils in the United States: are special interests over-represented? Mar Policy 27:193–206CrossRef Reed WJ (1979) Optimal escapement levels in stochastic and deterministic harvesting models. J Environ Econ Manag 6:350–363CrossRef Riboni A (2010) Committees as substitutes for commitment. Int Econ Rev 51(1):213–236CrossRef Rosenberg AA, Swasey JH, Bowman M (2006) Rebuilding US fisheries: progress and problems. Front Ecol Environ 4:303–308 Sinn H-W (2008) Public policies against global warming: a supply-side approach. Int Tax Public Finance 15:360–394CrossRef The LSL, The LCL, Sumaila UR, Cheung W (2013) Time discounting and the overexploitation of coral reefs. Environ Resour Econ 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9674-7 UNCLOS (1982) United Nations convention on the law of the sea. United Nations, New York
作者单位:Julia Hoffmann (1) Martin F. Quaas (1)
1. Department of Economics, University of Kiel, Wilhelm-Seelig-Platz 1, 24118, Kiel, Germany
Fisheries management often fails because total allowable catches (TACs) are set at inefficiently high levels. To study why decision-makers choose such high TACs, we model the annual negotiation on TACs as a dynamic game in discrete time. TACs are fixed by majority decision in a council consisting of decision-makers who are heterogeneous with respect to their discount rates. We show that the optimal feedback strategy for the less patient decision-makers will set inefficiently high TACs in Markov-perfect Nash equilibrium. A binding commitment to a long-term management plan could help solving this problem and lead to a more sustainable fishery management.