Bibliometric analysis of research progress in membrane water treatment technology from 1985 to 2013

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yunrong Dai ; Yonghui Song ; Hongjie Gao ; Siyu Wang ; Yu Yuan
• 关键词：Membrane technology ; Water treatment ; Bibliometric ; Research progress
• 刊名：Scientometrics
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：October 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：105
• 期：1
• 页码：577-591
• 全文大小：2,053 KB
• 参考文献：Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2005). The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry-academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment. Technovation, 25(11), 1273-280.CrossRef
  Du, H., Wei, L., Brown, M. A., et al. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of recent energy efficiency literatures: an expanding and shifting focus. Energy Efficiency, 6(1), 177-90.CrossRef
  Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Mapping of drinking water research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992-011. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 757-65.CrossRef
  Galvan, C., Casas, S., Llombart, M., et al. (2014). Direct pre-treatment of surface water through submerged hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes. Water Science and Technology-Water Supply, 14(3), 461-69.CrossRef
  Goh, P. S., Ng, B. C., Lau, W. J., et al. (2015). Inorganic nanomaterials in polymeric ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. Separation and Purification Reviews, 44(3), 216-49.CrossRef
  Han, M. Y., Sui, X., Huang, Z. L., et al. (2014). Bibliometric indicators for sustainable hydropower development. Ecological Indicators, 47, 231-38.CrossRef
  Huang, H., Schwab, K., & Jacangelo, J. G. (2009). Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: A Review. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(9), 3011-019.CrossRef
  Kang, G. D., & Cao, Y. M. (2012). Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review. Water Research, 46(3), 584-00.CrossRef
  Kimura, S. (1985). Research and development of membrane technologies and their applications in Japan. Desalination, 53(1-), 279-87.CrossRef
  Mela, G. S., Cimmino, M. A., & Ugolini, D. (1999). Impact assessment of oncology research in the European Union. European Journal of Cancer, 35(8), 1182-186.CrossRef
  Natale, F., Fiore, G., & Hofherr, J. (2012). Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature. Scientometrics, 90(3), 983-99.CrossRef
  Ortega, L. M., Lebrun, R., Blais, J. F., et al. (2007). Treatment of an acidic leachate containing metal ions by nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 54(3), 306-14.CrossRef
  Pendergast, M. M., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2011). A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy and Environmental Science, 4(6), 1946-971.CrossRef
  Peters, T. (2010). Membrane technology for water treatment. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 33(8), 1233-240.CrossRef
  Renou, S., Givaudan, J. G., Poulain, S., et al. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(3), 468-93.CrossRef
  Suk, F. M., Lien, G. S., Yu, T. C., et al. (2011). Global trends in Helicobacter pylori research from 1991 to 2008 analyzed with the science citation index expanded. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 23(4), 295-01.CrossRef
  Urbanowska, A., & Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M. (2014). Influence of operating conditions on performance of ceramic membrane used for water treatment. Chemical Papers, 68(2), 190-96.CrossRef
  Vanecek, J. (2008). Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research publications from 1994 to 2005. Scientometrics, 77(2), 345-60.CrossRef
  Xu, Y., Li, M., Liu, Z., et al. (2012). Scientific literature on monosialoganglioside in the science citation index-expanded a bibliometric analysis of articles from 1942 to 2011 by each decade. Neural Regeneration Research, 7(1), 72-9.MathSciNet
  Yang, L. Y., Yue, T., Ding, J. L., et al. (2012). A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 93(2), 497-16.CrossRef
  Zhai, L., Pan, Y., Guo, Y., et al. (2014). International comparative study on nanofiltration membrane technology based on relevant publications and patents. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1361-374.CrossRef
  Zhang, G., Li, X., Wu, S., et al. (2012). Effect of source water quality on arsenic (V) removal from drinking water by coagulation/microfiltration. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(4), 1269-277.CrossRef
  Zhang, F., & Xu, P. (2003). Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane technology and their application in water treatment industry. Membrane Science and Technology, 23(4), 241-45.MATH
  Zhu, H. T., Wen, X. H., & Huang, X. (2007). Research progress in membrane technologies for water and wastewater treatment. China Water and Wastewater, 23(22), 12-7.
  
• 作者单位：Yunrong Dai (1)
  Yonghui Song (1)
  Hongjie Gao (1)
  Siyu Wang (1)
  Yu Yuan (1)
  
  1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Department of Urban Water Environmental Research, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China
  
• 刊物主题：Information Storage and Retrieval; Library Science; Interdisciplinary Studies;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1588-2861

文摘

Research progress in membrane water treatment technology during 1985-013 was analyzed based on the bibliometric analysis of published papers in ISI Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index-Expanded, SCI-E) database, and patents in Derwent Innovation Index database. The searched data (18,075 SCI papers and 19,182 patents) were statistically analyzed from different time, countries, research institutions, mainstream technologies and application industries. The results indicated that, the number of papers and patents on the membrane water treatment technology showed an increasing trend. The United States and China published the most SCI papers and patents in this field, respectively. China has become one of the major countries in this field, but the research level should be further improved. The research levels of the United States, Germany and France were in the international leading level in this field. Japan published a small quantity of SCI papers, but possessed many patents and ranked in second place. Moreover, the patentees of the top 10 all belonged to Japanese companies or enterprises. The mainstream technologies in the field of membrane water treatment included microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, pervaporation and liquid membrane. Among these technologies, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and nanofiltration were the research hotspots in SCI papers, while reverse osmosis and liquid membrane were the research hotspots in patents. These mainstream technologies were mainly used for the treatment of drinking water and desalination of seawater or brackish water, and it is necessary to promote the application of membrane technologies in industrial wastewater treatment. Keywords Membrane technology Water treatment Bibliometric Research progress