Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Cheng Chen ; Xianghui Chen ; Min Gao ; Qiong Yang ; Hongmei Yan
• 关键词：tilt after ; effect ; contextual influence ; spatio ; temporal context ; foveal vision ; para ; foveal vision
• 刊名：Neuroscience Bulletin
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：June 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：31
• 期：3
• 页码：307-316
• 全文大小：887 KB
• 参考文献：[1]Schwartz O, Hsu A, Dayan P. Space and time in visual context. Nature Rev Neurosci 2007, 8: 522鈥?35.View Article
  [2]Schwartz O, Sejnowski T, Dayan P. Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion. J Vis 2009, 9: 1鈥?0.View Article PubMed
  [3]Clifford C, Spehar B, Solomon S, Martin P, Zaidi Q. Interactions between color and luminance in the perception of orientation. J Vis 2003, 3: 106鈥?15.View Article PubMed
  [4]Knapen T, Rolfs M, Wexler M, Cavanagh P. The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. J Vis 2010, 10: 1鈥?3.View Article PubMed
  [5]Mareschal I, Clifford CW. Dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109: 7553鈥?558.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [6]Jin D Z, Dragoi V, Sur M, Seung HS. Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex, J Neurophysiol 2005, 94: 4038鈥?050.View Article PubMed
  [7]Clifford CW, Wenderoth P, Spehar B. A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proc Biol Sci 2000, 267: 1705鈥?710.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [8]Wissig S, Kohn A. The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 2012, 107: 3370鈥?384.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [9]Guo K, Nevado A, Robertson R, Pulgarin M, Thiele A, et al. Effects on orientation perception of manipulating the spatiotemporal prior probability of stimuli. Vision Res 2004, 44: 2349鈥?358.View Article PubMed
  [10]Durant S, Clifford CW. Dynamics of the influence of segmentation cues on orientation perception. Vision Res 2006, 46: 2934鈥?940.View Article PubMed
  [11]Xing J, Heeger DJ. Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Res 2000, 40: 3065鈥?072.View Article PubMed
  [12]Liu TS, Larsson J, Carrasco M. Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron 2007, 55: 313鈥?23.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [13]Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 1997, 10: 433鈥?36.View Article PubMed
  [14]Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 1997, 10: 437鈥?42.View Article PubMed
  [15]Melcher D. Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10: 903鈥?07.View Article PubMed
  [16]Zimmermann E, Morrone MC, Fink GR, Burr D. Spatiotopic neur al representations develop slowly across saccades. Curr Biol 2013, 23: 193鈥?94.View Article
  [17]Parker D. Contrast and size variables and the tilt after-effect. Q J Exp Psychol 1972, 24: 1鈥?.View Article PubMed
  [18]Solomon JA, Morgan MJ. Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt. Proc Biol Sci 2006, 273: 2681鈥?686.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [19]Melcher D. Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception. Vision Res 2009, 49: 1249鈥?255.View Article PubMed
  [20]Zchaluk K. Foster DH. Model-free estimation of the psychometric function. Atten Percept Psychophys 2009, 71: 1414鈥?425.View Article
  [21]Muir D, Over R. Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. J Exp Psychol 1970, 85: 165鈥?70.View Article PubMed
  [22]Greenwood JA, Bex PJ, Dakin SC. Crowding changes appearance. Curr Biol 2010, 20: 496鈥?01.View Article PubMed Central PubMed
  [23]Spivey MJ, Spirn M. Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect. Percept Psychophys 2000, 62: 1525鈥?533.View Article PubMed
  [24]Li CY, Li W. Extensive integration field beyond the classical receptive field of cat鈥檚 striate cortical neurons: classification and tuning properties. Vision Res 1994, 34: 2337鈥?355.View Article PubMed
  [25]Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN. The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res 1990, 30: 1689鈥?701.View Article PubMed
  [26]Yao HS, Li CY. Clustered organization of neurons with similar extra-receptive field properties in the primary visual cortex. Neuron 2002, 35: 547鈥?53.View Article PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Cheng Chen (2)
  Xianghui Chen (1)
  Min Gao (1)
  Qiong Yang (1)
  Hongmei Yan (1)
  
  2. Chengdu College, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China
  1. Center for Information in BioMedicine, Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China
  
• 刊物主题：Neurosciences; Human Physiology; Anesthesiology; Anatomy; Neurology; Pain Medicine;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1995-8218

文摘

A sensory stimulus can only be properly interpreted in light of the stimuli that surround it in space and time. The tilt illusion (TI) and tilt after-effect (TAE) provide good evidence that the perception of a target depends strongly on both its spatial and temporal context. In previous studies, the TI and TAE have typically been investigated separately, so little is known about their co-effects on visual perception and information processing mechanisms. Here, we considered the influence of the spatial context and the temporal effect together and asked how center-surround context affects the TAE in foveal and para-foveal vision. Our results showed that different center-surround spatial patterns significantly affected the TAE for both foveal and para-foveal vision. In the fovea, the TAE was mainly produced by central adaptive gratings. Cross-oriented surroundings significantly inhibited the TAE, and iso-oriented surroundings slightly facilitated it; surround inhibition was much stronger than surround facilitation. In the para-fovea, the TAE was mainly decided by the surrounding patches. Likewise, a cross-oriented central patch inhibited the TAE, and an iso-oriented one facilitated it, but there was no significant difference between inhibition and facilitation. Our findings demonstrated, at the perceptual level, that our visual system adopts different mechanisms to process consistent or inconsistent central-surround orientation information and that the unequal magnitude of surround inhibition and facilitation is vitally important for the visual system to improve the detectability or discriminability of novel or incongruent stimuli.