The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Ching-Lung Tai ; Yung-Chou Chen ; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
- 关键词：Hip resurfacing ; Femoral head necrosis ; Stress shielding ; Finite element analysis
- 刊名：BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：December 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：15
- 期：1
- 全文大小：847 KB
- 参考文献：1. Mont, MA, Ragland, PS, Etienne, G, Seyler, TM, Schmalzried, TP (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: pp. 454-463
2. Grigoris, P, Roberts, P, Panousis, K, Bosch, H (2005) The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36: pp. 125-134 CrossRef
3. Girard, J, Lavigne, M, Vendittoli, PA, Migaud, H (2008) Hip resurfacing: current state of knowledge. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94: pp. 715-730 CrossRef
4. Amstutz, HC, Beaulé, PE, Dorey, FJ, Le Duff, MJ, Campbell, PA, GruEN, TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: pp. 28-39
5. Howie, DW, Cornish, BL, Vernon-Roberts, B (1993) The viability of the femoral head after resurfacing hip arthroplasty in humans. Clin Orthop 291: pp. 171-184
6. Grecula, MJ (2005) Resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 36: pp. 231-242 CrossRef
7. Amstutz, HC, Campbell, PA, Le Duff, MJ (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: pp. 1874-1877
8. Ritter, MA, Lutgring, JD, Berend, ME, Pierson, JL (2006) Failure mechanisms of total hip resurfacing: implications for the present. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453: pp. 110-114 CrossRef
9. Spencer, S, Carter, R, Murray, H, Meek, RM (2008) Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23: pp. 1105-1109 CrossRef
10. Wang, W, Geller, JA, Hasija, R, Choi, JK, Patrick, DA, Macaulay, W (2013) Longitudinal evaluation of time related femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. World J Orthop 4: pp. 75-79 CrossRef
11. Deuel, CR, Jamali, AA, Stover, SM, Hazelwood, SJ (2009) Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91: pp. 124-130 CrossRef
12. Radcliffe, IA, Taylor, M (2007) Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 22: pp. 780-786 CrossRef
13. Koo, KH, Kim, R (1995) Quantifying the extent of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A new method using MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77: pp. 875-880
14. Taylor, M (2006) Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220: pp. 289-297 CrossRef
15. Mann, KA, Bartel, DL, Wright, TM, Burstein, AH (1995) Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. J Biomech 28: pp. 1067-1078 CrossRef
16. Watanabe, Y, Shiba, N, Matsuo, S, Higuchi, F, Tagawa, Y, Inoue, A (2000) Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 15: pp. 505-511 CrossRef
17. Liu, WG, Wang, SJ, Yin, QF, Liu, SH, Guan, YJ (2012) Biomechanical supporting effect of tantalum rods for the femoral head with various sized lesions: a finite-element analysis. Chin Med J (Engl) 125: pp. 4061-4065
18. Tran, TN, Warwas, S, Haversath, M, Classen, T, Hohn, HP, J?ger, M, Kowalczyk, W, Landgraeber, S (2014) Experimental and computational studies on the femoral fracture risk for advanced core decompression. Clin Biomech 29: pp. 412-417 CrossRef
19. Ong, KL, Kurtz, SM, Manley, MT, Rushton, N, Mohammed, NA, Field, RE (2006) Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88: pp. 1110-1115- 刊物主题：Orthopedics; Rehabilitation; Rheumatology; Sports Medicine; Internal Medicine;
- 出版者：BioMed Central
- ISSN：1471-2474
文摘
Background Due to the advantages of its bone-conserving nature, hip resurface arthroplasty (HRA) has recently gained the interest of orthopedic surgeons for the treatment of young and active patients who have osteonerosis of the femoral head. However, in long-term follow-up studies after HRA, narrowing of the femoral neck has often been found, which may lead to fracture. This phenomenon has been attributed to the stress alteration (stress shielding). Studies addressing the effects of necrotic size and the orientation of the implant on stress alterations are lacking. Methods Computed tomography images of a standard composite femur were used to create a three-dimensional finite-element (FE) intact femur model. Based on the intact model, FE models simulating four different levels of necrotic regions (0°, 60°, 100°, 115°) and three different implant insertion angles (varus 10°, neutral, valgus 10°) were created. The von Mises stress distributions and the displacement of the stem tip of each model were analyzed and compared for loading conditions that simulated a single-legged stance. Results Stress shielding occurred at the femoral neck after HRA. More severe stress shielding and an increased displacement of the stem tip were found for femoral heads that had a wider necrotic lesion. From a biomechanics perspective, the results were consistent with clinical evidence of femoral neck narrowing after HRA. In addition, a varus orientation of the implant resulted in a larger displacement of the stem tip, which could lead to an increased risk of implant loosening. Conclusions A femoral head with a wide necrotic lesion combined with a varus orientation of the prosthesis increases the risk of femoral neck narrowing and implant loosening following HRA.