Integrating long-term seismic risk changes into improving emergency response and land-use planning: a case study for the Hsinchu City, Taiwan

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Hung-Chih Hung ; Ming-Chin Ho ; Yi-Jie Chen ; Chang-Yi Chian ; Su-Ying Chen
• 关键词：Seismic risk ; Land ; use planning ; Vulnerability ; Emergency management ; Urban dynamics
• 刊名：Natural Hazards
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：October 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：69
• 期：1
• 页码：491-508
• 全文大小：730KB
• 参考文献：1. Al-Momani NM, Harrald JR (2003) Sensitivity of earthquake loss estimation model: how useful are the prediction. Int J Risk Assess Manag 4(1):1-9 CrossRef
  2. Amini Hosseini K, Jafari MK, Hosseini M, Mansouri B, Hosseinioon S (2009) Development of urban planning guidelines for improving emergency response capacities in seismic areas of Iran. Disasters 33(4):645-64 CrossRef
  3. Barbat AH, Carre?o M-L, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Cardona OD, Marulanda MC (2010) Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1-):17-8 CrossRef
  4. Berke PR, Song Y, Stevens M (2009) Integrating hazard mitigation into new urban and conventional developments. J Plan Educ Res 28:441-55 CrossRef
  5. Burby RJ, French SP, Nelson A (1998) Plans, code enforcement, and damage reduction: evidence from Northridge earthquake. Earthq Spectra 14(1):59-4 CrossRef
  6. Burby RJ, Deyle RE, Godschalk DR, Olshansky RB (2000) Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Nat Hazard Rev 1(2):99-06 CrossRef
  7. Campbell KW, Thenhaus PC, Barnhard TP, Hampson DB (2002) Seismic hazard model for loss estimation and risk management in Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:743-54 CrossRef
  8. Carre?o M-L, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40:137-72 CrossRef
  9. Chang SE, Gregorian M, Pathman K, Yumagulova L, Tse W (2012) Urban growth and long-term changes in hazard risk. Environ Plan A 44:989-008 CrossRef
  10. Chen LC, Hung HC, Chen SY, Lai MJ (2002) The socioeconomic impacts and post-disaster recovery of Chi–Chi earthquake: a case study of Taichung and Nantou County, Taiwan. Civ Hydraul Eng 29(2):8-0
  11. Comerio MC (2004) Public policy for reducing earthquake risks: a US perspective. Build Res Inf 32(5):403-13 CrossRef
  12. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242-61 CrossRef
  13. Davidson R, Rivera M (2003) Projecting building inventory changes and the effect on hurricane risk. J Urban Plan Dev 129(4):211-30 CrossRef
  14. Erdik M, Durukal E (2008) Earthquake risk and its mitigation in Istanbul. Nat Hazards 44:181-97 CrossRef
  15. Hung HC (2009) The attitude towards flood insurance purchase when respondents-preferences are uncertain: a fuzzy approach. J Risk Res 12(1-):239-58 CrossRef
  16. Hung HC, Chen LC (2007) The application of seismic risk-benefit analysis to land-use planning in Taipei City. Disasters 31(3):256-76 CrossRef
  17. Hung HC, Wang TW (2011) Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: the case of the Second Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan. Risk Anal 31(4):668-83 CrossRef
  18. Inel M, Senel SM, Toprak S, Manav Y (2008) Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey. Nat Hazards 46(3):265-85 CrossRef
  19. Jain VM, Davidson R, Rosowsky D (2005) Modeling changes in hurricane risk over time. Nat Hazards Rev 6(2):88-6 CrossRef
  20. Kircher CA, Whitman RV, Holmes WT (2006) HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):45-9 CrossRef
  21. Landis J, Zhang M (1998a) The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 1: model logic and theory. Environ Plan B 25(5):657-66 CrossRef
  22. Landis J, Zhang M (1998b) The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 2: specification and calibration results of the land-use change submodel. Environ Plan B 25(6):795-24 CrossRef
  23. Lindell MK, Prater CS, Perry RW (2006) Fundamentals of emergency management. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Management Institute, Emmitsburg, MD
  24. Liu YC, Chien SY, Hung HC, Chen LC (2013) Exploring the spatial patterns of disaster impacts caused by Typhoon Morakot. J Chin Inst Eng. doi:10.1080/02533839.2012.727594
  25. Martelli L, Filippini M, Bagli S, Severi P, Tomasetti F (2007) Seismic risk reduction: a local effects map for territorial and urban planning. The example of the Rimini Territorial plan. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 48(2):151-62
  26. Mills ES, Hamilton BM (1997) Urban economics, 5th edn. Scott, Foresman and Company, London
  27. Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Raj A (2008) Earthquake hazard in Northeast India—a seismic microzonation approach with typical case studies from Sikkim Himalaya and Guwahati city. J Earth Syst Sci 117:809-31 CrossRef
  28. Nelson A, French SP (2002) Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: a case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. J Am Plan As 68(2):194-07 CrossRef
  29. Nirupama N, Simonovic SP (2007) Increase of flood risk due to urbanisation: a Canadian example. Nat Hazards 40(1):25-1 CrossRef
  30. NRC (2006) Facing hazards and disasters: understanding human dimensions. National Research Council, Committee on Disaster Research in the Social Science, The National Academics Press, Washington, DC
  31. Olshansky RB (2001) Land use planning for seismic safety: the Los Angeles County experience, 1971-994. J Am Plan As 67(2):173-85 CrossRef
  32. Olshansky RB, Wu Y (2001) Earthquake risk analysis for Los Angeles County under present and planned land uses. Environ Plan B 28(3):419-32 CrossRef
  33. Sarris A, Loupasakis C, Soupios P, Trigkas V, Vallianatos F (2010) Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: application to Chania City, Crete Island, Greece. Nat Hazards 54:395-12 CrossRef
  34. Schneider PJ, Schauer BA (2006) HAZUS-its development and its future. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):40-4 CrossRef
  35. Schwab AK, Eschelbach K, Brower DJ (2007) Hazard mitigation and preparedness. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
  36. Sengezer B, Ko? E (2005) A critical analysis of earthquakes and urban planning in Turkey. Disasters 29(2):171-94 CrossRef
  37. Shaw D, Yeh CH, Jean WU, Loh CH, Kuo YL (2007) A probabilistic seismic risk analysis of building losses in Taipei: an application of HAZ-Taiwan with its pre-processor and post-processor. J Chin Inst Eng 30(2):289-97 CrossRef
  38. Tate E, Cutter S, Berry M (2010) Integrated multihazard mapping. Environ Plan B 37(4):646-63 CrossRef
  39. Tyagunov S, Grünthal G, Wahlstr?m R, Stempniewski L, Zschau J (2006) Seismic risk mapping for Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:573-86 CrossRef
  40. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005-015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Geneva
  41. Verburg PH, Schot PP, Dijst MJ, Veldkamp A (2004) Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61(4):309-24 CrossRef
  42. Wegener M (1994) Operational urban models. J Am Plan As 60(1):17-9 CrossRef
  43. Yeh CH, Loh CH, Tsai KC (2006) Overview of Taiwan earthquake loss estimation system. Nat Hazards 37(1-):23-7 CrossRef
  44. Yong C, Ling C, Güendel F, Kulhánek O (2002) Seismic hazard and loss estimation for Central America. Nat Hazards 25(2):161-75 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Hung-Chih Hung (1)
  Ming-Chin Ho (2)
  Yi-Jie Chen (3)
  Chang-Yi Chian (3)
  Su-Ying Chen (4)
  
  1. Center for Land and Environmental Planning, National Taipei University, 151, University Road, San Shia, New Taipei City, 23741, Taiwan
  2. Architecture and Building Research Institute, 13th Floor, 200, Section?3 Beisin Road, Sindian, New Taipei City, 231, Taiwan
  3. Department of Real Estate and Built Environment, National Taipei University, 151, University Road, San Shia, New Taipei City, 23741, Taiwan
  4. National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, 9F, 200, Section?3 Beisin Road, Sindian, New Taipei City, 23143, Taiwan
  
• ISSN：1573-0840

文摘

An increasing number of rapidly growing urban areas in Asia are becoming more vulnerable to seismic hazards in their development process. However, local authorities rarely integrate seismic risk into the procedure of emergency and land-use planning. This article explores the question of whether seismic risks for urban areas are increasing or diminishing over time, while trends such as population growth and land development in hazard-prone areas increase the potential for loss in disasters. The net effects of such urbanization factors are examined through the use of simulation models that estimate building inventory and seismic loss changes. Seismic losses are modeled for a comparative analysis under the same hypothetical earthquake events hitting at different points in a city area’s long-term development. A case study of seismic risk assessments is illustrated by the Hsinchu City, Taiwan. Results of a prospective analysis indicate that, for the same seismic events, overall risk is expected to increase due to a forecast 2.9?% growth in building inventory. This increment in loss is largely attributed to a large amount of initial buildings predicted to be developed into commercial and industrial uses. However, the spatial pattern of risk would change slightly; particularly, the southeastern, eastern, and some older core areas would be the most vulnerable and risky both at current and future time periods. The approach here enables city planners to incorporate seismic risk analysis into predisaster emergency and land-use planning to encourage risk-reduction strategies.