Innovative magnetic rings for circumferential mucosectomy: preliminary research

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Geng Shu An (1)
  Zhang Qing Huai (1)
  Zhou Sheng (1)
  Zhang Shu Min (1)
  Yang Jing Wen (1)
  Hao Dong Ming (1)
  Zhang Zuo Xing (1)
  
• 关键词：Magnetic rings ; Compression anastomosis ; Circumferential mucosectomy
• 刊名：Surgery Today
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：January 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：45
• 期：1
• 页码：78-82
• 全文大小：1,048 KB
• 参考文献：1. Hardy KJ. Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60(8):625-3. CrossRef
  2. Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Compression anastomoses revisited. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(6):965-1. CrossRef
  3. Kopelman D, Hatoum OA, Kimmel B, Monassevitch L, Nir Y, Lelcuk S, et al. Compression gastrointestinal anastomosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(6):821-. CrossRef
  4. Jansen A, Brummelkamp WH, Davies GA, Klopper PJ, Keeman JN. Clinical applications of magnetic rings in colorectal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;153(4):537-5.
  5. Jansen A, Keeman JN, Davies GA, Klopper PJ. Early experiences with magnetic rings in resection of the distal colon. Neth J Surg. 1980;32(1):20-.
  6. Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Yamanouchi E, Kinoshita K, Takeda T, Ihara N. Yamanouchi magnetic compression anastomosis for bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after living-donor liver transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(9):1263-. CrossRef
  7. Mimuro A, Tsuchida A, Yamanouchi E, Itoi T, Ozawa T, Ikeda T, et al. A novel technique of magnetic compression anastomosis for severe biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(2):283-. CrossRef
  8. Erdmann D, Sweis R, Heitmann C, Yasui K, Olbrich KC, Levin LS, et al. Side-to-side sutureless vascular anastomosis with magnets. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(3):505-1. CrossRef
  9. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoid disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoid prolapse with a circular suturing devise: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the sixth world congress of endoscopic surgery. Rome;1998. pp 777-4.
  10. Okajima H, Kotera A, Takeichi T, Ueno M, Ishiko T, Hirota M, et al. Magnet compression anastomosis for bile duct stenosis after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11(4):473-. CrossRef
  11. Akita H, Hikita H, Yamanouchi E, Marubashi S, Nagano H, Umeshita K, et al. Use of a metallic-wall stent in the magnet compression anastomosis technique for bile duct obstruction after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14(1):118-0. CrossRef
  12. Erdmann D, Sweis R, Heitmann C, Yasui K, Olbrich KC, Levin LS, et al. Side-to-side sutureless vascular anastomosis with magnets. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(3):505-1. CrossRef
  13. Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Azagury D, Shaikh SN, Ha G, Greenwalt I, et al. Smart Self-Assembling MagnetS for ENdoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73(2):353-.
  14. Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S, Curran PF, Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, et al. Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(1):42-. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Geng Shu An (1)
  Zhang Qing Huai (1)
  Zhou Sheng (1)
  Zhang Shu Min (1)
  Yang Jing Wen (1)
  Hao Dong Ming (1)
  Zhang Zuo Xing (1)
  
  1. Department of Analogy Surgery, People’s Hospital of Tianjin, 190# Jieyuan Road, Nankai District, Tian Jin, 300192, China
  
• ISSN：1436-2813

文摘

Purpose To improve the procedures used to treat prolapse and hemorrhoids, novel magnetic rings were invented to use in circumferential mucosectomies to avoid the disadvantages of stapling techniques. Methods Thirty adult pigs were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (n?=?10), which underwent circumferential mucosectomy with novel magnetic rings; Group B (n?=?10), which underwent circumferential mucosectomy with conventional magnetic rings and Group C (n?=?10), which underwent circumferential mucosectomy with a stapling technique. Results All pigs underwent the operation successfully, and the mean length of the procedure was similar among the three groups (p?>?0.05). There was no bleeding in Group A or Group B, while there was a mean blood loss of 78.32?±?26.03?ml in Group C (p?p?p?p?>?0.05), avoiding the permanent implantation of staples in Group C. The anastomosis site in Group A showed a smoother and more rapid healing process than that in Group B or C. Conclusions The innovative magnetic rings we developed for circumferential mucosectomies provide a simple and novel surgical procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.