Political Connection, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Philanthropy in China: A Strategic-Political Perspective
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Sihai Li ; Xianzhong Song ; Huiying Wu
  • 关键词:Corporate social responsibility ; Corporate philanthropy ; Political interference ; Political connection ; Ownership type
  • 刊名:Journal of Business Ethics
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:June 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:129
  • 期:2
  • 页码:399-411
  • 全文大小:574 KB
  • 参考文献:Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 179.View Article
    Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. California: Sage.
    Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229-41.View Article
    Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2005). Social psychology (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 82-00.View Article
    Auten, G. E., Sieg, H., & Clotfelter, C. T. (2002). Charitable giving, income, and taxes: An analysis of panel data. The American Economic Review, 92(1), 371-82.View Article
    Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy restraining Robin hood? Business and Society, 41(3), 319-44.View Article
    Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6-8.View Article
    Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-343.View Article
    Brandt, L., & Li, H. (2003). Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information, or incentives? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 387-13.View Article
    Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855-77.View Article
    Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond resources the mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business and Society, 38(2), 167-87.View Article
    Campbell, L., Gulas, C. S., & Gruca, T. S. (1999). Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4), 375-83.View Article
    Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the UK 1985-000 some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1-), 29-1.View Article
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81-12.View Article
    Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595-603.View Article
    Dennis, B. S., Buchholtz, A. K., & Butts, M. M. (2009). The nature of giving a theory of planned behavior examination of corporate philanthropy. Business and Society, 48(3), 360-84.View Article
    Dickson, B. J. (2003). Red capitalists in China: The party, private entrepreneurs, and prospects for political change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-1.
    Doupnik, T. S., & Perera, H. (2011). International accounting. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2003). Rebate versus matching: Does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter? Journal of Public Economics, 87(3), 681-01.View Article
    Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 369-86.View Article
    Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905-28.View Article
    Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365-95.View Article
    Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected ceos, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330-57.View Article
    Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095-102.View Article
    Fonseka, M., Samarakoon, L. P., & Tian, G.-L. (2012). Equity financing capacity and stock returns: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(5), 1277-291.View Article
    Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.View Article
    Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E. (1982). Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 94-06.View Article
    Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-98.View Article
  • 作者单位:Sihai Li (1)
    Xianzhong Song (1)
    Huiying Wu (2)

    1. School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
    2. School of Business, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South DC, NSW, Australia
  • 刊物类别:Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
  • 刊物主题:Philosophy
    Ethics
    Economic Growth
    Management
    Quality of Life Research
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-0697
文摘
This paper investigates whether philanthropic giving decisions and amount of charitable giving are related to firms-political connections and ownership type. To this end, Chinese firms listed on either the Shenzhen or Shanghai stock exchange between 2004 and 2011 are examined, where government interference in the business sector is prevalent, state ownership structure is dominant, and corporate political connections prevail. Our analyses show (1) a significant and positive relationship between political connections and the likelihood and extent of firm contributions; (2) a significant and negative relationship between state ownership and extent of firm contributions; and (3) a stronger relationship between political connections and corporate philanthropy in non-state-owned firms. These findings with regard to the relationship between corporate giving, political connections, and ownership type have important implications for understanding corporate giving behavior in China and in emerging markets in general.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700