参考文献:1. N. H眉sing and U. Schubert, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 22 (1998). 2. D. A. Soleimani and M. H. Abbasi, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 199, 10 (2008). 3. J. H. Kim, C. M. Choi, S. R. Hwang, J. H. Kim, and Y. J. Oh, Korean J. Met. Mater. 48, 856 (2010). 4. M. Schmidt and F. Schwertfeger J. Non-Cryst. Solids 225, 364 (1998). 5. D. R. Ulrich, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 121, 465 (1990). 6. J. Fricke and T. Tillotson, Thin Solid Films 297, 212 (1997). 7. J. D. Mackenzie, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100, 162 (1988). 8. A. C. Pierre and G.M. Pajonk, Chem. Rev. 102, 4243 (2002). 9. A. Donatti Dario, A. I. Ruiz, and D. R. Vollet, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 9, 133 (2002). 10. D. A. Donatti, R. A. Ibanez, and D. R. Vollet, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 292, 44 (2001). 11. A. V. RaO, G. M. Pajonk, and N. N. Parvathy, J. Mater. Sci. 29, 1807 (1994). 12. P. B. Wagh, R. Begag, G. M. Pajonk, A.V. RaO, and D. Haranath, Materials Chemistry and Physics 57, 214 (1999). 13. A. V. RaO, G. M. Pajonk, D. Haranth, and P. B. Wagh, Microporous Materials 12, 63 (1997). 14. A. V. Rao and M. M. Kulkarni, Materials Chemistry and Physics 77, 819 (2002). 15. C. E. Kim, J. S. Yoon, and H. J. Hwang, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 49, 47 (2009). 16. K. Sink贸, Materials 3, 704 (2010). 17. A. V. Rao, N. N. Parvathy, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 3021 (1993). 18. R. M. A. Roque-Malherbe, Adsorption and Diffusion in Nanoporous Material, CRC press, Ch. 4. (2007).
作者单位:1. Engineering Ceramics Group, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon, Gyeongnam, 641-831 Korea2. Agency for Defense Development, Daejon, 305-600 Korea3. Graduate School of Green Energy Technology, Chungnam National University, Daejon, 305-764 Korea
ISSN:2005-4149
文摘
The synthesis behavior of nanoporous hydrophobic silica aerogel in honeycomb-type ceramics was observed using TEOS and MTES. Silica aerogel in the honeycomb ceramic structure was synthesized under ultrasound stimulation. The synthesized aerogel/honeycomb ceramic composites were dried under supercritical CO2 drying conditions. The values for the line shrinkage of the wet gels during supercritical CO2 drying declined from 19% to 4% with an increase in the H2O/TEOS molar ratio from 8 to 24. Low shrinkage was a key factor in increasing the interface compatibility with the aerogel/honeycomb ceramic composites. The optimum condition of silica aerogel in the honeycomb-type ceramic structure had a TEOS:MTES: H2O:glycerol ratio equal to 1:1.2:24:0.05 (mol%).