A Review of Family Engagement Measures for Adolescent Substance Use Services

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Robert Hock ; Mary Ann Priester ; Aidyn L. Iachini…
• 关键词：Family engagement ; Treatment engagement ; Substance use ; Measures ; Adolescent
• 刊名：Journal of Child and Family Studies
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：24
• 期：12
• 页码：3700-3710
• 全文大小：412 KB
• 参考文献：Accurso, E. C., Hawley, K. M., & Garland, A. F. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Caregivers and Parents. Psychological Assessment, 25, 244-52. doi:10.-037/?a0030551 .PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Bartolucci, A. A., & Hillegass, W. B. (2010). Overview, strengths, and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In F. Chiappelli, X. Maria, C. Brant, N. Neagos, O. O. Olumadayo, & M. H. Ramchandani (Eds.), Evidence-based practice-toward optimizing clinical outcomes (pp. 17-3). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
  Becker, K. D., Lee, B. R., Daleiden, E. L., Lindsey, M., Brandt, N. E., & Chorpita, B. F. (2013). The common elements of engagement in children’s mental health services: Which elements for which outcomes? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44(1), 30-3.CrossRef PubMed
  Cicchetti, D. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284.CrossRef
  Cicchetti, D., & Sparrow, S. S. (1990). Assessment of adaptive behavior in young children. In J. H. Johnson & J. Goldman (Eds.), Developmental assessment in clinical child psychology: A handbook (pp. 173-96). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
  Copello, A. G., Velleman, R. D., & Templeton, L. J. (2005). Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 369-85. doi:10.-080/-959523050030235- .CrossRef PubMed
  Cunningham, P. B., & Henggeler, S. W. (1999). Engaging multi-problem families in treatment: Lessons learned throughout the development of multisystemic therapy. Family Process, 38, 265-81.CrossRef PubMed
  Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., Claud, D. A., Reynolds, L. R., Brown, J., & Johnson, L. D. (2003). The Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a “working-alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3(1), 3-2.
  Fallon, T, Jr, Pumariega, A., Sowers, W., Klaehn, R., Huffine, C., Vaughan, T, Jr, et al. (2006). A level of care instrument for children’s systems of care: Construction, reliability and validity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 140-52.CrossRef
  Foster, S. L., Cunningham, P. B., Warner, S. E., McCoy, D. M., Barr, T. S., & Henggeler, S. W. (2009). Therapist behavior as a predictor of black and white caregiver responsiveness in multisystemic therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 626.CrossRef PubMed
  Germain, C., & Gitterman, A. (1996). The life model of social work practice: Advances in theory and practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Gopalan, G., Goldstein, L., Klingenstein, K., Sicher, C., Blake, C., & McKay, M. M. (2010). Engaging families into child mental health treatment: Updates and special considerations. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 182.PubMedCentral PubMed
  Gosnold (n.d.) Becoming family informed, family involved. Retrieved from www.?niatx.?net/?toolkits/?provider/?GosnoldFamilyInf?ormedEngagement.?pdf
  Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930-44.CrossRef
  Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliabiliy for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23-4.PubMedCentral PubMed
  Hogue, A., Dauber, S., Stambaugh, L. F., Cecero, J. J., & Liddle, H. A. (2006). Early therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in individual and family therapy for adolescent behavior problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 121-29. doi:10.-037/-022-006X.-4.-.-21 .PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Hogue, A., & Liddle, H. A. (2009). Family-based treatment for adolescent substance abuse: Controlled trials and new horizons in services research. Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 126-54.PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Hornberger, S., & Smith, S. L. (2011). Family involvement in adolescent substance abuse treatment and recovery: What do we know? What lies ahead? Children and Youth Services Review, 33, S70–S76.CrossRef
  Horvath, A., & Greenberg, L. (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 173). New York, NY: Wiley.
  Huffine, C., Jewell, S., Hutton, C., & Sowers, W. (2010). CALOCUS (Version 2010): Child and adolescent level of care utilization system. American Association of Community Psychiatrists. Retrieved from www.?communitypsychia?try.?org/-/span>
  Kim, H., Munson, M. R., & McKay, M. M. (2012). Engagement in mental health treatment among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 29, 241-66. doi:10.-007/?s10560-012-0256-2 .CrossRef
  King, G. A., Currie, M., & Petersen, P. (2014). Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: A motivational framework. Child and Adolescent Ment
• 作者单位：Robert Hock (1)
  Mary Ann Priester (1)
  Aidyn L. Iachini (1)
  Teri Browne (1)
  Dana DeHart (1)
  Stephanie Clone (1)
  
  1. University of South Carolina College of Social Work, 1731 College St., Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Behavioral Science
• 刊物主题：Psychology
  Child and School Psychology
  Social Sciences
  Sociology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-2843

文摘

The engagement of family members in adolescent substance use treatment is vital for adolescent treatment completion and positive outcomes. Providers and researchers need quality measures of family engagement to identify early engagement problems, to determine the effectiveness of engagement interventions, and to test theories of family treatment engagement. The purpose of this study is to review existing measures of family engagement, and to assess their conceptual coverage and utility for adolescent substance use providers. Our initial search of measures published in peer-reviewed, English-language journals between 1998 and 2013 yielded 58 articles. Of these, eight articles described measures of family engagement in substance use and mental health treatment. Measures were compared across numerous categories including instrument format and administration procedures; measurement of behavioral, attitudinal, and affective domains; measurement reliability and validity; and the populations and treatment settings in which the measures were used. Of the eight measures, four contained items assessing attitudinal engagement, five assessed affective engagement, and six measures assessed behavioral engagement. Two measures had items that assessed all three domains. Half of the measures were clinician-rated and half were self-report. None of the measures included normative data or clinical cut-off scores. All of the measures were relatively brief (2-4 items), though only two measures were administered in substance use treatment settings. The results of this review highlight the paucity of family engagement measures that assess the multi-dimensional conceptualization of the construct. Implications for the continued conceptualization and measurement of family treatment engagement in adolescent substance-use treatment settings are discussed. Keywords Family engagement Treatment engagement Substance use Measures Adolescent