Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yukie Sato ; Heike Staudacher ; Maurice W. Sabelis
• 关键词：Heterospecific mating ; Inbreeding avoidance ; Invasive species ; Male mate choice ; Reproductive interference
• 刊名：Experimental and Applied Acarology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：68
• 期：1
• 页码：21-31
• 全文大小：460 KB
• 参考文献：Allendorf FW, Lundquist LL (2003) Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv Biol 17:24鈥?0. doi:10.鈥?046/鈥媕.鈥?523-1739.鈥?003.鈥?2365.鈥媥 CrossRef
  Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  Antolin MF (1999) A genetic perspective on mating systems and sex ratios of parasitoid wasps. Res Popul Ecol 41:29鈥?7. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥婸L00011979 CrossRef
  Bitume EV, Bonte D, Ronce O et al (2013) Density and genetic relatedness increase dispersal distance in a subsocial organism. Ecol Lett 16:430鈥?37. doi:10.鈥?111/鈥媏le.鈥?2057 CrossRef PubMed
  Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:305鈥?39CrossRef PubMed
  Boubou A, Migeon A, Roderick GK et al (2012) Test of colonisation scenarios reveals complex invasion history of the red tomato spider mite Tetranychus evansi. PLoS ONE 7:e35601. doi:10.鈥?371/鈥媕ournal.鈥媝one.鈥?035601 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Boudreaux HB (1963) Biological aspects of some phytophagous mites. Annu Rev Entomol 8:137鈥?54. doi:10.鈥?146/鈥媋nnurev.鈥媏n.鈥?8.鈥?10163.鈥?01033 CrossRef
  Br眉ckner D (1978) Why are there inbreeding effects in haplo-diploid systems? Evolution 32:456鈥?58. doi:10.鈥?307/鈥?407613 CrossRef
  Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78:575鈥?95CrossRef PubMed
  Crozier RH (1985) Adaptive consequences of male haploidy. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies, and control, vol 1a. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201鈥?22
  Dame EA, Petren K (2006) Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus). Anim Behav 71:1165鈥?173. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媋nbehav.鈥?005.鈥?0.鈥?09 CrossRef
  Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175鈥?91. doi:10.鈥?758/鈥婤F03193146 CrossRef PubMed
  Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149鈥?160. doi:10.鈥?758/鈥婤RM.鈥?1.鈥?.鈥?149 CrossRef PubMed
  Ferragut F, Garz贸n-Luque E, Pekas A (2013) The invasive spider mite Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) alters community composition and host-plant use of native relatives. Exp Appl Acarol 60:321鈥?41. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10493-012-9645-7 CrossRef PubMed
  Ferrero M, Calvo FJ, Atuahiva T et al (2011) Biological control of Tetranychus evansi Baker & Pritchard and Tetranychus urticae Koch by Phytoseiulus longipes Evans in tomato greenhouses in Spain [Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae]. Biol Control 58:30鈥?5. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媌iocontrol.鈥?011.鈥?3.鈥?12 CrossRef
  Gr枚ning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257鈥?82CrossRef PubMed
  Helle W (1967) Fertilization in the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae: Acari). Entomol Exp Appl 10:103鈥?10. doi:10.鈥?111/鈥媕.鈥?570-7458.鈥?967.鈥媡b00049.鈥媥 CrossRef
  Helle W, Sabelis MW (1985) Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam
  Hochkirch A, Deppermann J, Gr枚ning J (2006) Visual communication behaviour as a mechanism behind reproductive interference in three pygmy grasshoppers (genus Tetrix, Tetrigidae, Orthoptera). J Insect Behav 19:559鈥?71. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10905-006-9043-2 CrossRef
  Hochkirch A, Gr枚ning J, B眉cker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76:633鈥?42. doi:10.鈥?111/鈥媕.鈥?365-2656.鈥?007.鈥?1241.鈥媥 CrossRef PubMed
  Kozak GM, Reisland M, Boughmann JW (2009) Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Evolution 63:353鈥?65. doi:10.鈥?111/鈥媕.鈥?558-5646.鈥?008.鈥?0564.鈥媥 CrossRef PubMed
  Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2012) The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:421鈥?27. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媡ree.鈥?012.鈥?4.鈥?01 CrossRef PubMed
  Navajas M, Lagnel J, Gutierrez J, Boursot P (1998) Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism. Heredity 80(Pt 6):742鈥?52CrossRef PubMed
  Navajas M, de Moraes GJ, Auger P, Migeon A (2012) Review of the invasion of Tetranychus evansi: biology, colonization pathways, potential expansion and prospects for biological control. Exp Appl Acarol 59:43鈥?5. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10493-012-9590-5 CrossRef PubMed
  Noor MAF (1996) Absence of species discrimination in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis males. Anim Behav 52:1205鈥?210. doi:10.鈥?006/鈥媋nbe.鈥?996.鈥?268 CrossRef
  Oku K (2008) Is only the first mating effective for females in the Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae)? Exp Appl Acarol 45:53鈥?7. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10493-008-9157-7 CrossRef PubMed
  Oku K (2009) Female mating strategy during precopulatory mate guarding in spider mites. Anim Behav 77:207鈥?11. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媋nbehav.鈥?008.鈥?9.鈥?30 CrossRef
  Pfennig KS (1998) The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate鈥搎uality recognition. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1743鈥?748. doi:10.鈥?098/鈥媟spb.鈥?998.鈥?497 CrossRef
  Potter DA, Wrensch DL (1978) Interrupted matings and the effectiveness of second inseminations in the twospotted spider mite. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:882鈥?85. doi:10.鈥?093/鈥媋esa/鈥?1.鈥?.鈥?82 CrossRef
  R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
  Saito Y, Sahara K, Mori K (2000) Inbreeding depression by recessive deleterious genes affecting female fecundity of a haplo-diploid mite. J Evol Biol 13:668鈥?78. doi:10.鈥?046/鈥媕.鈥?420-9101.鈥?000.鈥?0198.鈥媥 CrossRef
  Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS et al (2001) The population biology of invasive specie. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305鈥?32CrossRef
  Sato Y, Alba JM, Sabelis MW (2014) Testing for reproductive interference in the population dynamics of two congeneric species of herbivorous mites. Heredity 113:495鈥?02. doi:10.鈥?038/鈥媓dy.鈥?014.鈥?3 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Satoh Y, Yano S, Takafuji A (2001) Mating strategy of spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) males: postcopulatory guarding to assure paternity. Appl Entomol Zool 36:41鈥?5. doi:10.鈥?303/鈥媋ez.鈥?001.鈥?1 CrossRef
  Tien NSH, Massourakis G, Sabelis MW, Egas M (2011) Mate choice promotes inbreeding avoidance in the two-spotted spider mite. Exp Appl Acarol 54:119鈥?24. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10493-011-9431-y PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  Tien NSH, Sabelis MW, Egas M (2015) Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects. Heredity 114:327鈥?32. doi:10.鈥?038/鈥媓dy.鈥?014.鈥?06 CrossRef PubMed
  Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871鈥?971. Heinemann, pp. 136鈥?79
  Vala F, Egas M, Breeuwer JAJ, Sabelis MW (2004) Wolbachia affects oviposition and mating behaviour of its spider mite host. J Evol Biol 17:692鈥?00. doi:10.鈥?046/鈥媕.鈥?420-9101.鈥?003.鈥?0679.鈥媥 CrossRef PubMed
  Werren JH (1993) The evolution of inbreeding in haplodiploid organisms. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Theoretical and empirical perspectives. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 42鈥?9
  Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME (2008) Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:741鈥?51. doi:10.鈥?038/鈥媙rmicro1969 CrossRef PubMed
  Willis PM (2013) Why do animals hybridize? Acta Ethologica 16:127鈥?34. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠10211-013-0144-6 CrossRef
  Wirtz P (1999) Mother species鈥揻ather species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58:1鈥?2. doi:10.鈥?006/鈥媋nbe.鈥?999.鈥?144 CrossRef PubMed
  Yoshioka T, Yano S (2014) Do Tetranychus urticae males avoid mating with familiar females? J Exp Biol 217:2297鈥?300. doi:10.鈥?242/鈥媕eb.鈥?98277 CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Yukie Sato (1) (2)
  Heike Staudacher (1)
  Maurice W. Sabelis (1)
  
  1. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Ueda, Nagano, 386-2204, Japan
  
• 刊物主题：Entomology; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Animal Ecology; Life Sciences, general;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-9702

文摘

In some species, males readily show courtship behaviour towards heterospecific females and even prefer them to females of their own species. This behaviour is generally explained by indiscriminate mating to acquire more mates, but may partly be explained by male mate preference mechanisms that have developed to choose among conspecific females, as male preference for larger females causes mating with larger heterospecific females. Recently, we found that males of the red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi collected from Spain (invasive population), prefer to mate with females of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae rather than with conspecific females. In spider mites, mate preference for non-kin individuals has been observed. Here, we investigated if T. evansi males collected from the area of its origin (Brazil) also show preference for heterospecific females. Secondly, we investigated if mate preference of T. evansi males for heterospecific females is affected by their relatedness to conspecific females which are offered together with heterospecific females. We found that mate preference for heterospecific females exists in Brazilian T. evansi, suggesting that the preference for heterospecific females is not a lack of evolved premating isolation with an allopatric species. We found that T. evansi males showed lower propensity to mate with heterospecific females when alternative females were non-kin in the two iso-female lines collected from Brazil. However, the effect of relatedness on male mate preference was not significant. We discuss alternative hypotheses explaining why T. evansi males prefer to mate with T. urticae females. Keywords Heterospecific mating Inbreeding avoidance Invasive species Male mate choice Reproductive interference