Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape in women with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomised controlled trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Lore Schierlitz (1) (2)
  Peter L. Dwyer (1)
  Anna Rosamilia (2)
  Alison De Souza (1)
  Christine Murray (1)
  Elizabeth Thomas (1)
  Richard Hiscock (1)
  Chahin Achtari (1) (3)
  
• 关键词：Occult stress urinary incontinence ; Prolapse surgery ; Tension ; free vaginal tape
• 刊名：International Urogynecology Journal
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：January 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：25
• 期：1
• 页码：33-40
• 全文大小：200 KB
• 作者单位：Lore Schierlitz (1) (2)
  Peter L. Dwyer (1)
  Anna Rosamilia (2)
  Alison De Souza (1)
  Christine Murray (1)
  Elizabeth Thomas (1)
  Richard Hiscock (1)
  Chahin Achtari (1) (3)
  
  1. Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, 163 Studley Road, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia
  2. Department of Urogynaecology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Maternity-CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
  
• ISSN：1433-3023

文摘

Introduction We set out to determine if insertion of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling at the time of pelvic organ prolapse surgery improves continence outcomes in women with pre-operative occult stress incontinence (OSI) or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). Methods We conducted a randomised controlled study of prolapse surgery with or without a TVT midurethral sling. The pre- and post-operative assessment at 6?months included history, physical examination and urodynamic testing. Quality of life (QOL) and treatment success was assessed with the UDI-6 SF, IIQ-7 SF and a numerical success score. The primary outcome was symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) requiring continence surgery (TVT) at 6?months. Long-term follow-up continued to a minimum of 24?months. Secondary outcomes were quality of life parameters. Results Eighty women received prolapse surgery alone (n--3) or prolapse surgery with concurrent TVT (n--7). Six months following prolapse surgery 3 out of 43 (7?%) patients in the no TVT group requested sling surgery compared with 0 out of 37 (0?%) in the TVT group (ARR 7?% [95?%CI: 3 to 19?%], p--.11). After 24?months there was one further participant in the no TVT group who received a TVT for treatment of SUI compared with none in the TVT group (4 out of 43, 9.3?% versus 0 out of 37; ARR 9.3?% [95?%CI: ? to 22?%], p--.06). Both groups showed improvement in QOL difference scores for within-group analysis, without difference between groups. Conclusion These results support a policy that routine insertion of a sling in women with OSI at the time of prolapse repair is questionable and should be subject to shared decision-making between clinician and patient.