Comparing the costs of three prostate cancer follow-up strategies: a cost minimisation analysis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Alison M. Pearce ; Fay Ryan ; Frances J. Drummond…
- 关键词：Prostate cancer ; Follow ; up ; Cancer survivorship ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Cost minimisation ; Economic model
- 刊名：Supportive Care in Cancer
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：February 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：24
- 期：2
- 页码：879-886
- 全文大小：428 KB
- 参考文献：1.Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 49(6):1374–1403CrossRef
2.Sharp L, Deady S, Gallagher P, Molcho M, Pearce A, Alforque Thomas A et al (2014) The magnitude and characteristics of the population of cancer survivors: using population-based estimates of cancer prevalence to inform service planning for survivorship care. BMC Cancer 14:767PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
3.Davies N, Batehup L (2011) Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK. J Cancer Surviv 5(2):142–151PubMed CrossRef
4.Lewis RA, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Hendry M, Russell D et al (2009) Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 59(564):234–247CrossRef
5.Lewis R, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Wilkinson C, Hendry M et al (2009) Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 65(4):706–723PubMed CrossRef
6.Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B, Mazza D, Fallon-Ferguson J, Varlow M et al (2014) The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(1):38–48PubMed CrossRef
7.McIntosh HM, Neal RD, Rose P, Watson E, Wilkinson C, Weller D et al (2009) Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: a systematic review of international guidelines. Br J Cancer 100(12):1852–1860PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
8.Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh, R.C.N., Bolla, M., van Casteren, N.J., et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer - Update April 2014 [Internet]. European Association of Urology; 2014. Available from: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/09%20Prostate%20Cancer_LRLV2.pdf
9.NICE. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment, NICE Clinical Guideline 175 [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg175/resources/guidance-prostate-cancer-diagnosis-and-treatment-pdf
10.Neymark N (1998) Assessing the economic value of anticancer therapies. Recent Results Cancer Res Fortschritte Krebsforsch Prog Dans Rech Sur Cancer 148:1–285CrossRef
11.Briggs AH, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K (2006) Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12.National Cancer Registry Ireland. Incidence statistics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2014 Dec 11]. Available from: www.ncri.ie/data/incidence-statistics
13.Hennessy, M., O’Leary, E., Comber, H., Drummond, F.J., Sharp, L. Men’s experiences of prostate cancer care in Ireland: Findings from the PiCTure 2 Study. Irish Cancer Society and National Cancer Registry Ireland; In Press.
14.Hennessy, M., O’Leary, E., Comber, H., Drummond, F.J., Sharp, L (2013) Associations between men’s experiences of prostate cancer care and health-related quality-of-life and psychological wellbeing: findings from a national study: the influence of the clinical nurse specialist. Support Care Cancer, 21(Supplement 1).
15.Drummond, F.J., Kinnear, H., O’Leary, E., Donnelly, C., Gavin, A., Sharp, L. Long-term health related quality of life of prostate cancer survivors varies with primary treatment. Results from the PiCTure (Prostate Cancer Treatment, Your Experience) study. J Cancer Surviv. In Press;In Press.
16.Amling C, Blute M, Bergstralh E, Seay T, Slezak J, Zincke H (2000) Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. J Urol 164(1):101–105PubMed CrossRef
17.Central Statistics Office. Irish Life Tables No.15; 2005–2007. [Internet]. Central Statistics Office; 2009 [cited 2014 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.cso.ie/en/media/duplicatecsomedia/newmedia/releasespublications/documents/birthsdm/current/irishlife.pdf
18.Curtis, L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care [Internet]. Personal and Social Services Research Unit; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/2013/
19.Drummond FJ, Barrett E, Burns R, O’Neill C, Sharp L (2014) The number of tPSA tests continues to rise and variation in testing practices persists: a survey of laboratory services in Ireland 2008–2010. Ir J Med Sci 183(3):369–375PubMed CrossRef
20.Drummond FJ, O’Leary E, O’Neill C, Burns R, Sharp L. “Bird in the hand” cash was more effective than prize draws in increasing physician questionnaire response. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013 Oct 31 [cited 2013 Nov 14]; Available from: http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(13)00355-7/abstract
21.Curtis, L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care [Internet]. Personal and Social Services Research Unit; 2010 [cited 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/2010/
22.Central Statistics Office. Census 2011 This is Ireland (Part 1) [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.cso.ie/en/census/census2011reports/census2011thisisirelandpart1/
23.Health Service Executive. HSE PCRS – Statistical Analysis of Claims and Payments 2011 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2014 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/PCRS/PCRS_Publications/pcrsclaimsandpayments2011.pdf
24.Information H, Authority Q (2010) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland
25.XE. Currency Converter [Internet]. USA: XE; 2014 [cited 2014 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.ex.com/currencyconverter/
26.Eurostat. Comparative price levels [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Dec 11]. Available from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec00120
27.Lu W, Greuter MJW, Schaapveld M, Vermeulen KM, Wiggers T, de Bock GH (2012) Safety and cost-effectiveness of shortening hospital follow-up after breast cancer treatment. Br J Surg 99(9):1227–1233PubMed CrossRef
28.Augestad KM, Norum J, Dehof S, Aspevik R, Ringberg U, Nestvold T, et al. (2013) Cost-effectiveness and quality of life in surgeon versus general practitioner-organised colon cancer surveillance: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 3(4).
29.Koinberg I, Engholm G-B, Genell A, Holmberg L (2009) A health economic evaluation of follow-up after breast cancer surgery: results of an RCT study. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed 48(1):99–104
30.Government of Ireland. Budget 2015 [Internet]. Dublin, Ireland: Government Publications, Government of Ireland; 2014 Oct. Available from: http://www.budget.gov.ie/Budgets/2015/2015.aspx
31.Bourke J, Bradley C (2010) General Practice in Ireland in 201: A survey of staff and equipment investment, Working Paper Series [Internet]. Department of Economics, University College Cork, [cited 2014 Aug 5], Available from: http://www.icgp.ie/go/library/catalogue/item/70EA2819-C156-41DA-87708AC2549C7E0B/
32.Dittus K, Sprague B, Pace C, Dulko D, Pollack L, Hawkins N et al (2014) Primary care provider evaluation of survivorship care plans developed for patients in their practice. J Gen Pract 2(4):1–8
33.National Cancer Control Programme, Health Service Executive. Follow-up care plan after treatment for breast cancer: A guide for General Practitioners [Internet]. Dublin, Ireland: National Cancer Control Programme; 2013 [cited 2014 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/5/nccp/profinfo/Follow-up_care_plan_after_breast_cancer_-_a_guide_for_GPs.pdf
34.Irish Medical Organisation (2013) HSE failure to fund cancer care services in general practice leaves patients carrying the costs. Irish Medical Organisation, Dublin, Ireland
35.Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M et al (2012) Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv 6(4):359–371PubMed CrossRef
36.Payne H, Clarke N, Huddart R, Parker C, Troup J, Graham J (2013) Nasty or Nice? Findings from a UK Survey to Evaluate the Impact of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guidelines on the Management of Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol 25(3):178–189CrossRef - 作者单位：Alison M. Pearce (1)
Fay Ryan (2)
Frances J. Drummond (1)
Audrey Alforque Thomas (3)
Aileen Timmons (1)
Linda Sharp (1)
1. National Cancer Registry Ireland, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland
2. University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
3. National University Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland - 刊物类别：Medicine
- 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Nursing
Nursing Management and Research
Pain Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine - 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
- ISSN：1433-7339
文摘
Purpose Prostate cancer follow-up is traditionally provided by clinicians in a hospital setting. Growing numbers of prostate cancer survivors mean that this model of care may not be economically sustainable, and a number of alternative approaches have been suggested. The aim of this study was to develop an economic model to compare the costs of three alternative strategies for prostate cancer follow-up in Ireland—the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, the National Institute of Health Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and current practice.