Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：M. Zaruba (1)
  R. Kasper (1)
  R. Kazama (2)
  F. J. Wegehaupt (1)
  A. Ender (1)
  T. Attin (1)
  A. Mehl (1)
  
• 关键词：Composite inlay ; Ceramic inlay ; Minimally invasive ; Marginal adaption
• 刊名：Clinical Oral Investigations
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：March 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：18
• 期：2
• 页码：579-587
• 全文大小：402 KB
• 参考文献：1. Buonocore MG (1955) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849-53 CrossRef
  2. Staehle HJ (1999) Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhes Dent 1:267-84
  3. Nandini S (2010) Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent 13:184-94 CrossRef
  4. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29:481-08
  5. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G (1993) Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 24:641-58
  6. Lu H, Stansbury JW, Dickens SH, Eichmiller FC, Bowman CN (2004) Probing the origins and control of shrinkage stress in dental resin-composites: I. Shrinkage stress characterization technique. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:1097-103 CrossRef
  7. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32:109-15 CrossRef
  8. Stavridakis MM, Lutz F, Johnston WM, Krejci I (2003) Linear displacement and force induced by polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Am J Dent 16:431-38
  9. Roulet JF, Salchow B, Wald M (1991) Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. Dent Mater 7:44-9 CrossRef
  10. Lutz F, Kull M (1980) The development of a posterior tooth composite system, in-vitro investigation. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 90:455-83
  11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR (1986) Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 17:659-64
  12. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR (1986) Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 17:777-84
  13. Weaver WS, Blank LW, Pelleu GBJ (1988) A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 36:236-37
  14. Bertolotti RL (1991) Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 3:53-8
  15. Donly KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME (1989) An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 68:1234-237 CrossRef
  16. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F (1997) Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 22:21-9
  17. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21:17-4
  18. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64:658-64 CrossRef
  19. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-639 CrossRef
  20. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH (1999) Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 78:898-05 CrossRef
  21. Perdigao J, Swift EJ (1994) Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. Int Dent J 44:349-59
  22. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (1999) Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699-05 CrossRef
  23. Wendt SLJ, Leinfelder KF (1990) The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 120:177-81
  24. M?rmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F (1987) The Cerec system: computer-assisted fabrivation of direct ceramic inlays in one session. Quintessenz 38:457-70
  25. Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan–Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 3:9-3
  26. Fasbinder DJ (2006) Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl):22S-1S CrossRef
  27. Zimmer S, Gohlich O, Ruttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH, Barthel CR (2008) Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent 33:484-87 CrossRef
  28. Rusin RP (2001) Properties and applications of a new composite block for CAD/CAM. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22:35-1
  29. Magne P, Knezevic A (2009) Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 40:125-33
  30. Magne P, Knezevic A (2009) Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 40:729-37
  31. Tsitrou EA, van Noort R (2008) Minimal preparation designs for single posterior indirect prostheses with the use of the Cerec system. Int J Comput Dent 11:227-40
  32. Ahlers MO, Morig G, Blunck U, Hajto J, Probster L, Frankenberger R (2009) Guidelines for the preparation of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns. Int J Comput Dent 12:309-25
  33. Arnetzl GV, Arnetzl G (2006) Design of preparations for all-ceramic inlay materials. Int J Comput Dent 9:289-98
  34. Puckett BG (1947) The gold inlay: cavity preparation, pattern, casting and finishing. Dent Surv 23:638
  35. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F (1993) Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 72:490-94 CrossRef
  36. Krejci I, Dietschi D, Lutz FU (1998) Principles of proximal cavity preparation and finishing with ultrasonic diamond tips. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 10:295-98, quiz 300
  37. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953-60
  38. Krejci I, Albertoni M, Lutz F (1990) An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1164-168
  39. Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445-449
  40. Gohring TN, Besek MJ, Schmidlin PR (2002) Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent 30:119-27 CrossRef
  41. Gohring TN, Schonenberger KA, Lutz F (2003) Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent 16:275-82
  42. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26:357-66
  43. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F (1991) Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 7:107-13 CrossRef
  44. Heintze SD (2006) How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 22:712-34 CrossRef
  45. Caughman WF, Chan DC, Rueggeberg FA (2001) Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent 86:101-06 CrossRef
  46. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK (2004) A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 17:357-63
  47. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC (2002) Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 29:257-62 CrossRef
  48. Wagner WC, Aksu MN, Neme AM, Linger JB, Pink FE, Walker S (2008) Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. Oper Dent 33:72-8 CrossRef
  49. Rueggeberg FA, Daronch M, Browning WD, De Goes MF (2010) In vivo temperature measurement: tooth preparation and restoration with preheated resin composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 22:314-22 CrossRef
  50. Elsayad I (2009) Cuspal movement and gap formation in premolars restored with preheated resin composite. Oper Dent 34:725-31 CrossRef
  51. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF (2005) Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite. J Dent Res 84:663-67 CrossRef
  52. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F (1994) Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 25:403-09
  53. Rechenberg DK, Gohring TN, Attin T (2009) Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 12(3):189-96
  54. Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Stavridakis M, Ferrari M, Krejci I (2007) Marginal adaptation after aging of a self-etching adhesive containing an antibacterial monomer. J Adhes Dent 9:311-17
  55. Dietschi D, Moor L (1999) Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1:41-6
  56. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M (2008) Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 24:185-91 CrossRef
  57. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M (1993) Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 21:39-6 CrossRef
  58. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D (1998) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 106:1033-042 CrossRef
  59. Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C (2003) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 111:73-0 CrossRef
  60. Hickel R, Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3:45-4
  61. Santini A, Milia E (2004) Microleakage around a low-shrinkage composite cured with a high-performance light. Am J Dent 17:118-22
  62. Pashley DH (1989) Dentin: a dynamic substrate—a review. Scan Microsc 3:161-74, discussion 174-6
  63. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1993) Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 9:2- CrossRef
  64. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J, van Waas M (2000) Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 84:506-13 CrossRef
  65. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J (1995) Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 105:299-05
  66. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J (1993) An in vitro study of parameters related to marginal and internal seal of bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 24:281-91
  67. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC (1995) Ceramic inlay movement during polymerization of resin luting cements. Eur J Oral Sci 103:186-89 CrossRef
  68. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 29:123-30 CrossRef
  69. Bortolotto T, Onisor I, Krejci I (2007) Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning. Clin Oral Investig 11:35-3 CrossRef
  70. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL (1997) Microleakage of four class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 28:135-44
  71. Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N, Hausmann P, Klaiber B (2001) In vivo study of small class II composite fillings. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 111:11-8
  72. Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Folwaczny M, Hickel R (2004) Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 6:239-45
  73. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH (1989) Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 68:1540-544 CrossRef
  74. Richter J, Mehl A (2006) Evaluation for the fully automatic inlay reconstruction by means of the biogeneric tooth model. Int J Comput Dent 9:101-11
  75. Ender A, Mormann WH, Mehl A (2010) Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology. Clin Oral Investig 15(2):283-89 CrossRef
  76. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA (2002) Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22:241-49
  77. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA (2002) Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 87:503-09 CrossRef
  78. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP (1995) Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: veneers vs. PFM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 126:1523-529 CrossRef
  79. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE (2005) Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 94:511-19 CrossRef
  80. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C et al (2005) Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 26:6449-459 CrossRef
  81. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA (2007) Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 2):269-73
  
• 作者单位：M. Zaruba (1)
  R. Kasper (1)
  R. Kazama (2)
  F. J. Wegehaupt (1)
  A. Ender (1)
  T. Attin (1)
  A. Mehl (1)
  
  1. Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland
  2. Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  
• ISSN：1436-3771

文摘

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the effect of a minimally invasive mesial–occlusal–distal (mod) preparation on the marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays with the aim of saving sound dental substance. Materials and methods Class II mod cavities were prepared in 50 extracted human molars and randomly allocated to five groups (n--0). In all groups, the mesial–proximal box margins were located in the dentin, 1?mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), while the distal box margins were 1?mm above the CEJ. In groups A and B, conventional standard preparations with a divergent angle of α--° were prepared. In groups C, D, and E, minimally invasive standard preparations with a convergent angle of α--0° were prepared. In groups A and D, composite inlays and, in groups B and C, ceramic inlays were fabricated (chairside economical restoration of esthetic ceramics (CEREC)) and adhesively inserted. In group E, a direct composite filling using the incremental technique was placed. Replicas were taken before and after thermomechanical loading (1,200,000?cycles, 50/5?°C, max. load 49?N). Marginal integrity (tooth–luting composite, luting composite–inlay) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (×200). The percentage of continuous margins in the different locations was compared between and within groups before and after cycling, using ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc test. Results After the thermomechanical loading, no significant differences were observed between the different groups with respect to the interface of luting composite–inlay. At the interface of tooth–luting composite for preparations involving the dentin, groups A and B behaved significantly better compared to the control group E, which in turn were not different to groups C and D. Conclusion Composite and ceramic inlays inserted in minimally invasive prepared mod cavities result in margins not different from those of inlays placed in conventional mod preparations. Direct composite filling margins, however, were inferior to those attained by conventional indirect restorations. Clinical relevance Minimally invasive preparations for mod inlays with undercuts show marginal adaptation equal to that of conventional inlay preparation design.