Combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: indication and surgical outcomes

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ming-Kai Hsieh ; Lih-Huei Chen ; Chi-Chien Niu ; Tsai-Sheng Fu ; Po-Liang Lai…
• 关键词：Degenerative lumbar scoliosis ; De novo scoliosis ; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion ; Instrumented fusion
• 刊名：BMC Surgery
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：15
• 期：1
• 全文大小：745 KB
• 参考文献：1. Ploumis, A, Transfledt, EE, Denis, F (2007) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J 7: pp. 428-36 CrossRef
  2. Aebi, M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14: pp. 925-48 CrossRef
  3. Berven, SH, Deviren, V, Mitchell, B, Wahba, G, Hu, SS, Bradford, DS (2007) Operative management of degenerative scoliosis:an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies based on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18: pp. 261-72 CrossRef
  4. Oskouian, RJ, Shaffrey, CI (2006) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17: pp. 299-315 CrossRef
  5. Daffner, SD, Vaccaro, AR (2003) Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Am J Orthop 32: pp. 77-82
  6. Anand, N, Baron, EM, Thaiyananthan, G, Khalsa, K, Goldstein, TB (2008) Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21: pp. 459-67 CrossRef
  7. Winter, RB, Lonstein, JE, Denis, F (1988) Pain patterns in adult scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19: pp. 339-45
  8. Crandall, DG, Revella, J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: pp. 2126-33 CrossRef
  9. Rajaraman, V, Vingan, R, Roth, P, Heary, RF, Conklin, L, Jacobs, GB (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91: pp. 60-4
  10. Pateder, DB, Kebaish, KM, Cascio, BM, Neubaeur, P, Matusz, DM, Kostuik, JP (2007) Posterior Only Versus Combined Anterior and Posterior Approaches to Lumbar Scoliosis in Adults. A Radiographic Analysis. Spine 32: pp. 1551-4 CrossRef
  11. Hsieh, PC, Koski, TR, O’Shaughnessy, BA, Sugrue, P, Salehi, S, Ondra, S (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7: pp. 379-86 CrossRef
  12. Ploumis, A, Wu, C, Fischer, G, Mehbod, AA, Wu, W, Faundez, A (2008) Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 21: pp. 120-5 CrossRef
  13. Potter, BK, Freedman, BA, Verwiebe, EG, Hall, JM, Polly, DW, Kuklo, TR (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18: pp. 337-46 CrossRef
  14. Birknes, JK, White, AP, Albert, TJ, Shaffrey, CI, Harrop, JS (2008) Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review. Neurosurgery 63: pp. 94-103 CrossRef
  15. Heary, RF, Kumar, S, Bono, CM (2008) Decision making in adult deformity. Neurosurgery 63: pp. 69-77 CrossRef
  16. Blumenthal, SL, Ohnmeiss, DD (2003) Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases. Spine J 3: pp. 301-9 CrossRef
  17. Janssen, ME, Lam, C, Beckham, R (2001) Outcomes of allogenic cages in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 10: pp. S158-68
  18. Groth, AT, Kuklo, TR, Klemme, WR, Polly, DW, Schroeder, TM (2005) Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylind
• 刊物主题：Surgery; Internal Medicine;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：1471-2482

文摘

Background Traditional approaches to deformity correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis include anterior-posterior approaches and posterior-only approaches. Most patients are treated with posterior-only approaches because the high complication rate of anterior approach. Our purpose is to compare and assess outcomes of combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion with posterior alone approach for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with spinal stenosis. Methods Between November 2002 and November 2011, a total of 110 patients with degenerative spinal deformity and curves measuring over 30°were included. Of the 110 patients who underwent surgery, 56 underwent the combined anterior and posterior approach and 54 underwent posterior surgery at our institution. The following were the indications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: (1) rigid or frank lumbar kyphosis, (2) anterior or lateral bridged traction osteophytes, (3) gross coronal and sagittal deformity or imbalance, and (4) severe disc space narrowing that is not identifiable when performing posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry disability index and the visual analog scale. The status of fusion were assessed according to the radiographic findings. Results All patients received clinical and radiographic follow-up for a minimum of 24 months, with an average follow-up of 53 months (range, 26-6 months). At the final follow-up, the mean ODI score improved from 28.8 to 6.4, and the mean back/leg VAS, from 8.2/5.5 to 2.1/0.9 in AP group and the mean ODI score improved from 29.1 to 6.2, and the mean back/leg VAS, from 9.0/6.5 to 2.3/0.5 in P group. The mean scoliotic angle changed from 41.3° preoperatively to 9.3°, and the lumbar lordotic angle, from 3.1° preoperatively to 35.7°in AP group and the mean scoliotic angle from 38.5 to 21.4 and the lumbar lordotic angle from 6 to 15.8 in P group. There were significant differences in sagittal (P = 0.009) and coronal (P = 0.02) plane correction between the two groups. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis effectively improves sagittal and coronal plane alignment than posterior group and both group were effectively improves clinical scores.