Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure, density, and yield of forest stands
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Hans Pretzsch ; Gerhard Schütze
- 关键词：Size hierarchy ; Size asymmetry of competition ; Size asymmetry of growth ; Space filling ; Complementary light use ; Growth partitioning ; Growth elasticity
- 刊名：European Journal of Forest Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：January 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：135
- 期：1
- 页码：1-22
- 全文大小：2,375 KB
- 参考文献：Assmann E (1954) Die Standraumfrage und die Methodik von Mischbestandsuntersuchungen. Allg Forst- und Jagdztg 125:149–153
Assmann E (1956) Natürlicher Bestockungsgrad und Zuwachs. Forstw Cbl 75:257–265CrossRef
Assmann E (1968) Zur Theorie der Grundflächenhaltung. Forstw Cbl 87:321–330CrossRef
Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 506 p
Bayer D, Seifert S, Pretzsch H (2013) Structural crown properties of Norway spruce and European beech in mixed versus pure stands revealed by terrestrial laser scanning. Trees 27(4):1035–1047CrossRef
Bergel D (1985) Douglasien-Ertragstafel für Nordwestdeutschland. Niedersächs Forstl Versuchsanst, Abt Waldwachstum, 72 p
Bielak K, Dudzińska M, Pretzsch H (2014) Mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst] can be more productive than monocultures. Evidence from over 100 years of observation of long-term experiments. For Syst 23(3):573–589
Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG (2004) Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For Ecol Manage 193(1):5–16CrossRef
Binkley D, Kashian DM, Boyden S, Kaye MW, Bradford JB, Arthur MA, Fornwalt PJ, Ryna MG (2006) Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. For Ecol Manage 236(2):193–201CrossRef
Binkley D, Campoe OC, Gspaltl M, Forrester DI (2013) Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: why patterns differ for trees and stands. For Ecol Manage 288:5–13CrossRef
Bortz J (1993) Statistik. Springer, Berlin, 753 pCrossRef
Brus DJ, Hengeveld GM, Walvoort DJJ, Goedhart PW, Heidema AH, Nabuurs GJ, Gunia K (2011) Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. Eur J For Res 131(1):145–157CrossRef
Buongiorno J, Dahir S, Lu HC, Lin CR (1994) Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. For Sci 40(1):83–103
Coomes DA, Allen RB (2007) Mortality and tree-size distributions in natural mixed-age forests. J Ecol 95(1):27–40CrossRef
de Camino R (1976) Zur Bestimmung der Bestandeshomogenität. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 147:54–58
de Martonne E (1926) Une novelle fonction climatologique: L’indice d’aridité. La Météorologie 21:449–458
del Río M, Sterba H (2009) Comparing volume growth in pure and mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica. Ann For Sci 66(5):1–11CrossRef
del Río M, Condés S, Pretzsch H (2014) Analyzing size-symmetric vs. size-asymmetric and intra-vs. inter-specific competition in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) mixed stands. For Ecol Manage 325:90–98CrossRef
Deleuze C, Pain O, Dhote JF, Herve JC (2004) A flexible radial increment model for individual trees in pure even-aged stands. Ann For Sci 61(4):327–335CrossRef
Dirmhirn I (1964) Das Strahlungsfeld im Lebensraum. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M
Dirnberger GF, Sterba H (2014) A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands. For Syst 23(3):534–546
Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart
Forrester DI (2014) The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: from pattern to process. For Ecol Manage 312:282–292CrossRef
Forrester DI, Albrecht AT (2014) Light absorption and light-use efficiency in mixtures of Abies alba and Picea abies along a productivity gradient. For Ecol Manage 328:94–102CrossRef
Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK (2006) Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: a review. For Ecol Manage 233:211–230CrossRef
Forrester DI, Collopy JJ, Beadle CL, Baker TG (2012) Interactive effects of simultaneously applied thinning, pruning and fertiliser application treatments on growth, biomass production and crown architecture in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For Ecol Manage 267:104–116CrossRef
Forrester DI, Kohnle U, Albrecht AT, Bauhus J (2013) Complementarity in mixed-species stands of Abies alba and Picea abies varies with climate, site quality and stand density. For Ecol Manage 304:233–242CrossRef
Franz F, Bachler J, Deckelmann B, Kennel E, Kennel R, Schmidt A, Wotschikowsky U (1973) Bayerische Waldinventur 1970/71, Inventurabschnitt I: Großrauminventur Aufnahme- und Auswertungsverfahren. Forstl Forschungsber München 11, 143 p
Griess VC, Knoke Th (2011) Growth performance, windthrow, and insects: meta-analyses of parameters influencing performance of mixed-species stands in boreal and northern temperate biomes. Can J For Res 41:1141–1158CrossRef
Hara T (1992) Effects of the mode of competition on stationary size distribution in plant populations. Annals Botany 69(6):509–513
Hara T (1993) Mode of competition and size-structure dynamics in plant communities. Plant Species Biol 8(2–3):75–84CrossRef
Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London
Hasenauer H, Kindermann G, Steinmetz P (2006) The tree growth model MOSES 3.0. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Springer, Berlin, pp 64–70CrossRef
Huber MO, Sterba H, Bernhard L (2014) Site conditions and definition of compositional proportion modify mixture effects in Picea abies–Abies alba stands. Can J For Res 44(10):1281–1291CrossRef
Johann K (1993) DESER-Norm 1993. Normen der Sektion Ertragskunde im Deutschen Verband Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten zur Aufbereitung von waldwachstumskundlichen Dauerversuchen. Proc Dt Verb Forstl Forschungsanst, Sek Ertragskd, in Unterreichenbach-Kapfenhardt, pp 96–104
Katholnig L (2012) Growth dominance and Gini-Index in even-aged and in uneven-aged forests, Master thesis, Univ. of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, BoKu, Vienna, 67 p
Kelty MJ (1992) Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed stands. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 125–141CrossRef
Kennel R (1965) Untersuchungen über die Leistung von Fichte und Buche im Rein- und Mischbestand. AFJZ 136(149–161):173–189
Kramer H (1988) Waldwachstumslehre. Paul Parey, Hamburg, 374 pp
Le Moguedec G, Dhote JF (2012) Fagacees: a tree-centered growth and yield model for sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann For Sci 69(2):257–269CrossRef
Loreau M (1998) Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82(3):600–602CrossRef
Mitscherlich G (1971) Wald, Wachstum und Umwelt. 2. Band, Waldklima und Wasserhaushalt. JD Sauerländer’s Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 365 p
Morin X, Fahse L, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bugmann H (2011) Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol Lett 14:1211–1219PubMed CrossRef
Nagel J (1999) Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zum schrittweisen Aufbau eines waldwachstumskundlichen Simulationssystems für Nordwestdeutschland. Schr Forstl Fak Univ Göttingen u Niedersächs Forstl Versuchsanst 128, JD Sauerländer’s Verlag
Otto HJ (1994) Waldökologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Paquette A, Messier C (2011) The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20(1):170–180CrossRef
Perot T, Picard N (2012) Mixture enhances productivity in a two-species forest: evidence from a modeling approach. Ecol Res 27(1):83–94CrossRef
Piotto D (2008) A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations. For Ecol Manag 255:781–786CrossRef
Pretzsch H (2005) Stand density and growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Evidence from long-term experimental plots. Eur J For Res 124:193–205CrossRef
Pretzsch H (2006) Species-specific allometric scaling under self-thinning. Evidence from long-term plots in forest stands. Oecologia 146:572–583PubMed CrossRef
Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Springer, Berlin, 664 p
Pretzsch H (2010) Zur Verteilung des Zuwachses zwischen den Bäumen eines Bestandes und Abhängigkeit des Verteilungsschlüssels von den Standortbedingungen. Allg Forst- u J-Ztg 181(1/2): 4–13
Pretzsch H (2014) Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manage 327:251–264CrossRef
Pretzsch H, Dieler J (2011) Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory. Oecologia 169(3):637–649CrossRef
Pretzsch H, Schütze G (2009) Trangressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur J For Res 128:183–204CrossRef
Pretzsch H, Schütze G (2014) Size-structure dynamics of mixed versus pure forest stands. For Syst 23(3):560–572
Pretzsch H, Biber P, Ďurský J (2002) The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation. For Ecol Manage 162(1):3–21CrossRef
Pretzsch H, Block J, Dieler J, Dong PH, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zingg A (2010) Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1051/forest/2010037
Pretzsch H, Matthew C, Dieler J (2012) Allometry of tree crown structure. In: Matyssek R et al (eds) Growth and defense in plants, ecological studies 220, chapter 13. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–310. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30645-7_13
Pretzsch H, Bielak K, Block J, Bruchwald A, Dieler J, Ehrhart H-P, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zasada M, Zingg A (2013a) Productivity of pure versus mixed stands of oak (Quercus petraea (MATT.) LIEBL and Quercus robur L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an ecological gradient. Eur J For Res 132(2):263–280CrossRef
Pretzsch H, Bielak K, Bruchwald A, Dieler J, Dudzińska M, Ehrhart H-P, Jensen AM, Johannsen VK, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zasada M, Zingg A (2013b) Mischung und Produktivität von Waldbeständen. Ergebnisse langfristiger ertragskundlicher Versuche. Allg For Jagdztg 184:177–196 (In German with English summary)
Pretzsch H, Block J, Dieler J, Gauer J, Göttlein A, Moshammer R, Schuck J, Weis W, Wunn U (2014) Nährstoffentzüge durch die Holz- und Biomassenutzung in Wäldern. Teil 1: Schätzfunktionen für Biomasse und Nährelemente und ihre Anwendung in Szenariorechnungen. Allg Forst u J-Ztg 185(11/12):261–285
Pretzsch H, Biber P, von Gadow K (2015a) Ernst Assmann: a German pioneer in forest production ecology and quantitative silviculture. Eur J For Res 134(3):391–402CrossRef
Pretzsch H, del Río M, Ammer C, Avdagic A, Barbeito I, Bielak K, Brazaitis G, Coll L, Dirnberger G, Drössler L, Fabrika M, Forrester DI, Godvod K, Heym M, Hurt V, Kurylyak V, Löf M, Lombardi F, Matović B, Mohren F, Motta R, den Ouden J, Pach M, Ponette Q, Schütze G, Schweig J, Skrzyszewski J, Sramek V, Sterba H, Stojanović D, Svoboda M, Vanhellemont, M, Verheyen K, Wellhausen K, Zlatanov T, Bravo-Oviedo A (2015b) Growth and yield of mixed versus pure stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe. Eur J For Res 134(5):927–947
Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res 46:627–638
Richards AE, Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2010) The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. Tree Physiol 30(9):1192–1208PubMed CrossRef
Río MD, Schütze G, Pretzsch H (2014) Temporal variation of competition and facilitation in mixed species forests in Central Europe. Plant Biol 16(1):166–176PubMed CrossRef
Schober R (1967) Buchen-Ertragstafel für mäßige und starke Durchforstung. In: Schober R (ed) Die Rotbuche 1971. Schr Forstl Fak Univ Göttingen u Niedersächs Forstl Versuchsanst 43/44. JD Sauerländer’s Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 333 p
Schwinning S, Weiner S (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447–455CrossRef
Sterba H (1991) Forstliche Ertragslehre 4. Lecture at the Univ Bodenkulturl, Wien, 160 p
Sterba H, Monserud RA (1997) Applicability of the forest stand growth simulator PROGNAUS for the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif. Ecol Model 98(1):23–34CrossRef
Sterba H, del Río M, Brunner A, Condes S (2014) Effect of species proportion definition on the evaluation of growth in pure vs. mixed stands. For Syst 23(3):547–559
Strigul N, Pristinski D, Purves D, Dushoff J, Pacala St (2008) Scaling from trees to forests: tractable macroscopic equations for forest dynamics. Ecol Monogr 78(4):523–545CrossRef
Toïgo M, Vallet P, Perot T, Bontemps J-D, Piedallu C, Courbaud B (2015a) Overyielding in mixed forests decreases with site productivity. J Ecol 103:502–512CrossRef
Toïgo M, Vallet P, Tuilleras V, Lebourgeois F, Rozenberg P, Perret S, Courbaud B, Perot T (2015b) Species mixture increases the effect of drought on tree ring density, but not on ring width, in Quercus petraea–Pinus sylvestris stands. For Ecol Manage 345:73–82CrossRef
Vallet P, Perot T (2011) Silver fir stand productivity is enhanced when mixed with Norway spruce: evidence based on large-scale inventory data and a generic modelling approach. J Veg Sci 22(5):932–942CrossRef
Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 237 pCrossRef
Webster CR, Lorimer CG (2003) Comparative growing space efficiency of four tree species in mixed conifer–hardwood forests. For Ecol Manage 177(1):361–377CrossRef
Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5(11):360–364PubMed CrossRef
Wichmann L (2001) Annual variations in competition symmetry in even-aged Sitka spruce. Ann Bot 88:145–151CrossRef
Wichmann L (2002) Competition symmetry. Chapter 7. In: Modelling the effects of competition between individual trees in forest stands. Ph.D. Thesis, Unit of Forestry, Copenhagen, pp 67–77
Wiedemann E (1936/42) Die Fichte 1936. Verlag M & H Schaper, Hannover, 248 p
Wiedemann E (1943) Kiefern-Ertragstafel für mäßige Durchforstung, starke Durchforstung und Lichtung. In: Wiedemann E (ed) Die Kiefer 1948. Verlag M & H Schaper, Hannover, 337 p
Yokozawa M, Kubota Y, Hara T (1998) Effects of competition mode on spatial pattern dynamics in plant communities. Ecol Model 106(1):1–16CrossRef
Zeide B (1985) Tolerance and self-tolerance of trees. For Ecol Manage 13:149–166CrossRef
Zhang Y, Chen HY, Reich PB (2012) Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J Ecol 100(3):742–749CrossRef
Zhao D, Borders B, Wilson M, Rathbun SL (2006) Modeling neighborhood effects on the growth and survival of individual trees in a natural temperate species-rich forest. Ecol Model 196(1):90–102CrossRef
Zöhrer F (1969) Bestandeszuwachs und Leistungsvergleich montan, subalpiner Lärchen-Fichten-Mischbestand. Forstwiss Cent 88(1):41–63CrossRef - 作者单位：Hans Pretzsch (1)
Gerhard Schütze (1)
1. Chair for Forest Growth and Yield Science, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354, Freising, Bavaria, Germany - 刊物主题：Forestry; Plant Sciences; Plant Ecology;
- 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- ISSN：1612-4677
文摘
An increasing number of studies provide evidence that mixed-species stands can overyield monocultures. But it is still hardly understood, how the overyielding at the stand level emerges from the tree, canopy, and size structure. Analyses of 42 triplets with 126 mixed and mono-specific plots in middle-aged, two-species stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), and European beech (Fagus sylvativa L.) in Central Europe revealed that mixed-species compared with mono-specific stands can have (1) higher tree numbers, higher right skewness and kurtosis of the size distribution, higher inequality of tree sizes, and thereby higher stocking densities and sum of crown projection areas, (2) growth–size relationships with stronger size asymmetry of growth and higher inequality of size growth, and (3) higher stand productivity coupled with higher maximum stand density, canopy space filling, and size asymmetry. These differences depend on the species assemblage. They suggest a deeper entrance of light into the canopy as well as a higher light interception and light-use efficiency as main causes of the overyielding and overdensity. We discuss implications for research and silviculture and draw conclusions for designing and managing resource-efficient production systems. Keywords Size hierarchy Size asymmetry of competition Size asymmetry of growth Space filling Complementary light use Growth partitioning Growth elasticity