Guaranteed Geocast Routing Protocol for Vehicular Adhoc Networks in Highway Traffic Environment

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Omprakash Kaiwartya ; Sushil Kumar
• 关键词：Vehicle ; to ; vehicle communication ; Intermittently connected networks ; Geocast routing ; VANETs ; Next hop vehicle ; Guaranteed routing
• 刊名：Wireless Personal Communications
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：August 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：83
• 期：4
• 页码：2657-2682
• 全文大小：2,238 KB
• 参考文献：1.Status Report on Road Safety (2013). World Health Organization (WHO). http://鈥媤ww.鈥媤ho.鈥媔nt/鈥媣iolence_鈥媔njury_鈥媝revention/鈥媟oad_鈥媠afety_鈥媠tatus/鈥?013/鈥媏n/鈥?/span> . Accessed 10, 2014
  2.The statistical report 2012, Delhi Police. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媎elhipolice.鈥媙ic.鈥媔n/鈥?/span> . Accessed 13, 2014
  3.Karagiannis, G., Altintas, O., Ekici, E., Heijenk, G., Jarupan, B., Lin, K., & Weil, T. (2011). Vehicular networking: A survey and tutorial on requirements, architectures, challenges, standards and solutions. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 13(4), 584鈥?16.View Article
  4.Olariu, S., & Weigle, M. C. (Eds.). (2010). Vehicular networks: From theory to practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  5.Emmelmann, M., Bochow, B., & Kellum, C. (Eds.). (2010). Vehicular networking: automotive applications and beyond (Vol. 2). Hoboken: Wiley.
  6.Hartenstein, H., & Laberteaux, K. P. (Eds.). (2010). VANET: Vehicular applications and inter-networking technologies. Chichester: Wiley.
  7.Baiocchi, A., & Cuomo, F. (2013). Infotainment services based on push-mode dissemination in an integrated VANET and 3G architecture. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(2), 179鈥?90.View Article
  8.Omar, H. A., Zhuang, W., & Li, L. (2013). VeMAC: A TDMA-based MAC protocol for reliable broadcast in VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(9), 1724鈥?736.View Article
  9.Watanabe, F., Fujii, M., Itami, M., & Itoh, K. (2005). An analysis of incident information transmission performance using MCS/CDMA scheme. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005. Proceedings, IEEE (pp. 249鈥?54). IEEE.
  10.Blum, Jeremy J., & Eskandarian, Azim. (2007). A reliable link-layer protocol for robust and scalable intervehicle communications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(1), 4鈥?3.View Article
  11.IEEE 802.11 Working Group. (2010). IEEE standard for information technology-telecommunications and information exchange between systems-local and metropolitan area networks-specific requirements-part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications amendment 6: Wireless access in vehicular environments. IEEE Standard, 802. 11p.
  12.Armstrong, L. & Fisher, W. IEEE 802.11P Wireless access for vehicular environment. Draft standard, http://鈥媑rouper.鈥媔eee.鈥媜rg/鈥媑roups/鈥?02/鈥?1/鈥?/span> . Accessed 16, 2014
  13.Kaiwartya, O., Kumar, S., Lobiyal, D. K., Abdullah, A. H., & Hassan, A. N. (2014). Performance improvement in geographic routing for vehicular Ad Hoc networks. Sensors, 14(12), 22342鈥?2371.View Article
  14.DSRC Standards: What鈥檚 New? ITS Standards Advisory number 3. US Department of Transportation. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媔ts.鈥媎ot.鈥媑ov/鈥婦SRC/鈥?/span> . Accessed 02, 2014
  15.Kaiwartya, O., Kumar, S., Lobiyal, D. K., Tiwari, P. K., Abdullah, A. H., & Hassan, A. N. (2015). Multi-objective dynamic vehicle routing problem and time seed based solution using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Sensors, 2015, 1鈥?4.
  16.Rao, R. S., Soni, S. K., Singh, N., & Kaiwartya, O. (2014). A probabilistic analysis of path duration using routing protocol in VANETs. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2014, 1鈥?0.
  17.Dora, D. P., Kumar, S., & Kaiwartya, O. (2015). Efficient dynamic caching for geocast routing in VANETs. In Proceedings of the international conference on signal processing and integrated networks (SPIN-2015), 19鈥?0 February, Noida.
  18.Vahdat, A., & Becker, D. (2000). Epidemic routing for partially connected ad hoc networks (p. 18). Technical Report CS-200006, Duke University.
  19.Spyropoulos, T., Psounis, K., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2005, August). Spray and wait: An efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking (pp. 252鈥?59). ACM.
  20.Lindgren, A., Davies, E., Grasic, S., & Doria, A. (2012). Probabilistic routing protocol for intermittently connected networks. Lulea University of Technology, draft-irtf-dtnrg-prophet-10. https://鈥媡ools.鈥媔etf.鈥媜rg/鈥媓tml/鈥媟fc6693 . Accessed 07, 2014
  21.Pereira, P. R., Casaca, A., Rodrigues, J. J., Soares, V. N., Triay, J., & Cervell贸-Pastor, C. (2012). From delay-tolerant networks to vehicular delay-tolerant networks. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 14(4), 1166鈥?182.View Article
  22.Kaiwartya, O., & Kumar, S. (2014, May). Geocasting in vehicular adhoc networks using particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (pp. 62鈥?6). ACM.
  23.Wu, D., Zhu, G., & Zhao, D. (2013). Adaptive carry-store forward scheme in two-hop vehicular delay tolerant networks. Communications Letters, IEEE, 17(4), 721鈥?24.View Article
  24.Musolesi, M., & Mascolo, C. (2009). CAR: Context-aware adaptive routing for delay-tolerant mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(2), 246鈥?60.View Article
  25.Soares, V. N., Rodrigues, J. J., & Farahmand, F. (2014). GeoSpray: A geographic routing protocol for vehicular delay-tolerant networks. Information Fusion, 15, 102鈥?13.View Article
  26.Li, F., Zhao, L., Fan, X., & Wang, Y. (2012). Hybrid position-based and DTN forwarding for vehicular sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2012(1), 1鈥?0.MathSciNet
  27.Niyato, D., Wang, P., & Teo, J. C. M. (2009). Performance analysis of the vehicular delay tolerant network. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2009. WCNC 2009. IEEE (pp. 1鈥?). IEEE.
  28.Mershad, K., Artail, H., & Gerla, M. (2012). ROAMER: Roadside units as message router in VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(3), 479鈥?96.View Article
  29.Kaiwartya, O., Kumar, S., & Kasana, R. (2013, August). Traffic light based time stable geocast (T-TSG) routing for urban VANETs. In Contemporary Computing (IC3), 2013 Sixth International Conference on (pp. 113鈥?17). IEEE.
  30.Kaiwartya, O., & Kumar, S. (2014). Enhanced caching for geocast routing in vehicular Ad Hoc network. In Intelligent computing, networking, and informatics (pp. 213鈥?20). Springer India.
  31.Wang, Z., Tameh, E. K., & Nix, A. R. (2008). Joint shadowing process in urban peer-to-peer radio channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(1), 52鈥?4.View Article
  32.Li, C., Zhao, C., Zhu, L., Lin, H., & Li, J. (2014). Geographic routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks in city scenarios: a proposal and analysis. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27(12), 4126鈥?143.View Article
  33.Kaiwartya, O., & Kumar, S. (2013). Cache agent based geocasting (CAG) in VANETs.聽International Journal of Information and Communication Technology,. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媔nderscience.鈥媍om/鈥媔nfo/鈥媔ngeneral/鈥媐orthcoming.鈥媝hp?鈥媕code=鈥媔jict . Accessed 12, 2014
  34.Kaiwartya, O., & Kumar, S. (2014). Geocast routing: Recent advances and future challenges in vehicular adhoc networks. In Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 291鈥?96). IEEE.
  35.Raw, R. S., & Das, S. (2013). Performance analysis of P-GEDIR protocol for vehicular ad hoc network in urban traffic environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 68(1), 65鈥?8.View Article
  36.Fonseca, A., & Vaz茫o, T. (2013). Applicability of position-based routing for VANET in highways and urban environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(3), 961鈥?73.View Article
  37.Lim, S., Yu, C., & Das, C. R. (2009). Cooperative cache invalidation strategies for internet-based vehicular Ad Hoc networks. In聽Computer Communications and Networks. ICCCN, Proceedings of 18th Internatonal Conference on (pp. 1鈥?). IEEE.
  38.Chen, H., Xiao, Y., & Vrbsky, S. V. (2013). An update-based step-wise optimal cache replacement for wireless data access. Computer Networks, 57(1), 197鈥?12.View Article
  39.Rich, E., Knight, K., & Nair, S. B. (2009). Artificial intelligence. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited.
  40.NS-2 Mannual. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媔si.鈥媏du/鈥媙snam/鈥媙s/鈥媙s-documentation.鈥媓tml . Accessed 03, 2014
  41.Chung, J. & Claypool, M. ns by example. http://鈥媙ile.鈥媤pi.鈥媏du/鈥婲S/鈥?/span> . Accessed 07, 2014
  42.Karnadi, F. K., Mo, Z. H., & Lan, K. C. (2007). Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. WCNC, IEEE (pp. 2506鈥?511). IEEE.
  
• 作者单位：Omprakash Kaiwartya (1)
  Sushil Kumar (1)
  
  1. Communication Networks & Simulation Research Lab, School of Computer & Systems Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
  
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Electronic and Computer Engineering
  Signal,Image and Speech Processing
  Processor Architectures
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-834X

文摘

Geocast routing is one of the most investigated choices for reliable and efficient dissemination of information because of group of vehicles sharing geographic region on the road. Most of geocast routing protocols for intermittently connected Vehicular Adhoc Networks, suffer from low packet delivery, high end-to-end delay and elevated packet loss in intermittently connected networks and low throughput, high hop-to-hop disconnection, larger hop-count in fully connected networks. In this paper, guaranteed geocast routing (GGR) protocol for intermittently connected highway traffic environment has been proposed. GGR utilizes caching and heuristic function for reliable next hop vehicle selection. It also uses FAST (group of neighboring vehicles moving at higher speed than current forwarder) in packet delivery and SLOW (group of neighboring vehicles moving at lower speed than current forwarder) in hop-to-hop failure recovery. One-hop delivery has been guaranteed through acknowledgement. The proposed protocol has been simulated using NS-2 and its performance has been compared with that of adoptive carry-store forward, spray & wait and epidemic routing protocols. Results reveal that the performance of GGR is better in terms of number of routing matrices considered for both intermittently and fully connected networks.