Taurolidine as an effective and biocompatible additive for plaque-removing techniques on implant surfaces

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Gordon John ; Frank Schwarz ; Jürgen Becker
• 关键词：Peri ; implantitis ; Non ; surgical ; Air powder flow ; Air ; abrasive device ; Plastic curettes
• 刊名：Clinical Oral Investigations
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：June 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：19
• 期：5
• 页码：1069-1077
• 全文大小：1,249 KB
• 参考文献：1.Klokkevold PR, Newman MG (2000) Current status of dental implants: a periodontal prospective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:56-5PubMed
  2.Lekholm U, Adell R, Eriksson B, Br?nemark PI, Jemt T (1990) Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:347-59PubMed
  3.Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergstr?m C, van Steenberghe D (1999) Survival rate of Branemark implants in partially edentulous jaws: a 10?year study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 69:639-45
  4.Renvert S, Polyzois I, Maguire R (2009) Re-osseointegration on previously contaminated surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(4):216-27View Article PubMed
  5.Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T (2008) Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 35(8):286-91View Article PubMed
  6.Berglundh T, Gotfredsen K, Zitzmann NU, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2007) Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(5):655-61View Article PubMed
  7.Heitz-Mayfield LJ (2008) Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 35(8):292-04View Article PubMed
  8.Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Popovski K, Hartig B, Becker J (2009) Influence of different air-abrasive powders on cell viability at biologically contaminated titanium dental implants surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88(1):83-1View Article PubMed
  9.Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Marinello C, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B (1992) Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 3(1):1-View Article PubMed
  10.Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J (2001) Experimental peri-implant mucositis in man. J Clin Periodontol 28(6):517-23View Article PubMed
  11.Fürst M, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Persson GR (2007) Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:501-08View Article PubMed
  12.Salvi GE, Fürst MM, Lang NP, Persson GR (2008) One-year bacterial colonization patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and other bacteria at implants and adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:242-48View Article PubMed
  13.Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P (1999) Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:473-90PubMed
  14.Quirynen M, De Soete M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:1-9View Article PubMed
  15.Leonhardt A, Dahlén G, Renvert S (2003) Five year clinical, microbiological, and radiological outcome following treatment of peri-implantitis in man. J Periodontol 74:1415-422View Article PubMed
  16.Renvert S, Lessem J, Dahlén G, Renvert H, Lindahl C (2008) Mechanical and repeated antimicrobial therapy using a local drug delivery system in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 5:836-44View Article
  17.Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP (1990) The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 61(8):485-90View Article PubMed
  18.Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A (1998) In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 69(8):857-64View Article PubMed
  19.Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Christoffers AB, Gotz H, Jansen B, Duschner H, d’Hoedt B (2005) In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er:YAG laser and an air powder system. Clin Oral Implants Res 16(1):36-3View Article PubMed
  20.Sahrmann P, Ronay V, Hofer D, Attin T, Jung RE, Schmidlin PR (2013) In vitro cleaning potential of three different implant debridement methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi: 10.-111/?clr.-2322
  21.Cochis A, Fini M, Carrassi A, Migliario M, Visai L, Rimondini L (2013) Effect of air polishing with glycine powder on titanium abutment surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(8):904-09View Article PubMed
  22.Jones CG (1997) Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000(15):55-2View Article
  23.Arweiler NB, Boehnke N, Sculean A, Hellwig E, Auschill TM (2006) Differences in efficacy of two commercial 0.2?% chlorhexidine mouthrinse solutions: a 4-day plaque re-growth study. J Clin Periodontol 33:334-39View Article PubMed
  24.Fl?tra L, Gjermo P, R?lla G, Waerhaug J (1972) A 4-month study on the effect of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on 50 soldiers. Scand J Dent Res 80:10-7PubMed
  25.Schaupp H, Wohnaut H (1978) Disturbances of taste from oral disinfectants. HNO 26:335-41PubMed
  26.Wilken R, Botha SJ, Grobler A, Germishuys PJ (2001) In vitro cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine gluconate, benzydamin
• 作者单位：Gordon John (1)
  Frank Schwarz (1)
  Jürgen Becker (1)
  
  1. Department of Oral Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Dentistry
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1436-3771

文摘

Objectives The aim of the present study was the evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of two plaque-removing techniques, plastic curettes (PC) and glycine powder airflow (GLY) in combination with taurolidine (T), chlorhexidine (CHX), or pure water (PW) as additives and compared to groups without previous treatment (NT). Materials and methods Plaque was collected on titanium samples for 48?h in six subjects. Specimens were worn in a special splint in the upper jaw and randomly assigned to test and control groups. After biofilm removal procedures, clean implant surface (CIS) on the samples and treatment time were taken as parameters. Results Mean CIS was determined in the following descending order: T-GLY > CHX-GLY > NT-GLY > T-PC > PW-GLY > PW-PC > CHX-PC > NT-PC. Mean treatment time was determined in the following ascending order: T-GLY < CHX-GLY < PW-GLY < NT-GLY < T-PC < CHX-PC < PW-PC < NT-PC. Conclusions Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that T showed the highest CIS in the GLY and PC groups. T-GLY showed significantly more CIS than all other GLY groups. The T-PC group showed significantly more CIS than all other PC groups. The treatment times of the T groups were significantly lower than their corresponding PC or GLY groups. Clinical relevance The results of the current study indicate that taurolidine seems to enhance effectiveness of plaque-removing procedures with plastic curettes and glycine powder airflow. Also, the efficiency of both treatment procedures seems to be increased.