Biomechanical pregnant pelvic system model and numerical simulation of childbirth: impact of delivery on the uterosacral ligaments, preliminary results
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：J. Lepage ; C. Jayyosi ; P. Lecomte-Grosbras ; M. Brieu…
- 关键词：Childbirth simulation ; Finite element method ; Pelvic system ; Biomechanical model ; Damage process ; Shell model
- 刊名：International Urogynecology Journal
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：April 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：26
- 期：4
- 页码：497-504
- 全文大小：760 KB
- 参考文献：1. Mant, J, Painter, R, Vessey, M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104: pp. 579-585 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11536.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. Goh JT (2003) Biomechanical and biochemical assessments for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:391-94. Available via com/coobgyn/Fulltext/2003/10000/Biomechanical_and_biochemical_assessments_for.7.aspx" class="a-plus-plus">http://journals.lww.com/coobgyn/Fulltext/2003/10000/Biomechanical_and_biochemical_assessments_for.7.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2013
3. Samuelsson, EC, Victor, FT, Tibblin, G, Sv?rdsudd, KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: pp. 299-305 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70203-6" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. Swift, SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: pp. 277-285 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.107583" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. Schaal J-P, Riethmuller D, Maillet R (1998) Mécanique et techniques obstétricales [Internet]. Sauramps Médical. Available via ce.asp?ouvrage=2161713" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=2161713. Accessed 12 Nov 2013
6. Moreau, R, Pham, MT, Silveira, R, Redarce, T, Brun, X, Dupuis, O (2007) Design of a new instrumented forceps: application to safe obstetrical forceps blade placement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54: pp. 1280-1290 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2006.889777" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. Parente, MP, Natal Jorge, RM, Mascarenhas, T, Silva-Filho, AL (2010) The influence of pelvic muscle activation during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 115: pp. 804-808 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d534cd" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
8. Li, X, Kruger, JA, Nash, MP, Nielsen, PMF (2011) Anisotropic effects of the levator ani muscle during childbirth. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10: pp. 485-494 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0249-z" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
9. Venugopala Rao, G, Rubod, C, Brieu, M, Bhatnagar, N, Cosson, M (2010) Experiments and finite element modelling for the study of prolapse in the pelvic floor system. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 13: pp. 349-357 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255840903251270" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
10. Cosson, M, Rubod, C, Vallet, A, Witz, JF, Dubois, P, Brieu, M (2013) Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model. Int Urogynecol J 24: pp. 105-112 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1842-8" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
11. Kamina, P, Demondion, X, Richer, JP, Scepi, M, Faure, JP (2003) Anatomie clinique de l’appareil génital féminin. Encycl Méd Chir Ed Sci Méd Elsevier SAS Paris Gynécol 10: pp. A10
12. Créquat, J, Duyme, M, Brodaty, G (2000) Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 28: pp. 435-445
13. Cosson, M, Rubod, C, Vallet, A, Witz, J-F, Brieu, M (2011) Biomechanical modeling of pelvic organ mobility: towards personalized medicine. Bull Acad Natl Med 195: pp. 1869-1883
14. Rubod, C, Boukerrou, M, Brieu, M, Dubois, P, Cosson, M (2007) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. Part 1: new experimental protocol. J Urol 178: pp. 320-325 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.040" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
15. Rubod, C, Boukerrou, M, Brieu, M, Jean-Charles, C, Dubois, P, Cosson, M (2008) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19: pp. 811-816 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0533-3" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
16. Rubod, C, Brieu, M, Cosson, M, Rivaux, G, Clay, J-C, Landsheere, L (2012) Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. Urology 79: pp. 968.e17-968.e22 class="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.010" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. Rahn, DD, Ruff, MD, Brown, SA, Tibbals, HF, Word, RA (2008) Biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall: effect of pregnancy, elastic fiber deficiency, an - 刊物主题：Gynecology; Urology/Andrology;
- 出版者：Springer London
- ISSN：1433-3023
文摘
Introduction and hypothesis We created a pregnant woman pelvic model to perform a simulation of delivery to understand the pathophysiology of urogenital prolapse by studying the constraints on the pelvic components (muscles, ligaments, pelvic organs) during childbirth. These simulations will also provide valuable tools to understand and teach obstetrical mechanics. Methods We built a numerical model of the pelvic system from a term pregnant woman, using the finite element method on a mesh built from magnetic resonance images of a nulliparous pregnant woman. Mechanical properties of pelvic tissues already determined by the team were adapted to account for pregnancy. Results The system allows delivery to be simulated. When a fetal head at the 50th percentile for the term goes through the pelvic system, uterosacral ligaments undergo a deformation of around 30?%. Uterosacral ligaments are the major pelvic sustaining structures, their lesion may be a potential cause of urogenital prolapse. We built a model of childbirth as a function of pregnancy term by varying volumes of fetal head and uterus. The impact on uterosacral ligaments is higher when the fetal head is larger. Conclusions Our modelling is rather complete considering that it involves many organs including ligaments. It allows us to analyse the effect of childbirth on uterosacral ligaments and to understand how they impact on pelvic statics. First results are promising, but optimisation and future simulations will be needed. We also plan to simulate various delivery scenarios (cephalic, breech presentation, instrumental extraction), which will be useful to study perineal lesions and also to teach obstetrical mechanics.