Closing the Loop: Action Research in a Multimodal Hereditary Cancer Patient Conference is an Effective Tool to Assess and Address Patient Needs
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Carin R. Espenschied (1)
Deborah J. MacDonald (1)
Julie O. Culver (1)
Sharon Sand (1)
Karen Hurley (2)
Kimberly C. Banks (3)
Jeffrey N. Weitzel (1)
Kathleen R. Blazer (1) - 关键词：BRCA ; Patient conference ; Patient needs ; Patient experiences ; Genetic counseling
- 刊名：Journal of Cancer Education
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：June 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：27
- 期：3
- 页码：467-477
- 全文大小：239KB
- 参考文献：1. Weitzel JN (1999) Genetic cancer risk assessment: putting it all together. Cancer 86(11):2483鈥?492 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991201)86:11+<2483::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-4">CrossRef
2. Trepanier A, Ahrens M, McKinnon W et al (2004) Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 13(2):83鈥?14 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018821.48330.77">CrossRef
3. Palomares MR, Paz IB, Weitzel JN (2005) Genetic cancer risk assessment in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient is useful and possible in practice. J Clin Oncol 23(13):3165鈥?166, author reply 3166鈥?167 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.157">CrossRef
4. MacDonald DJ, Blazer KR, Weitzel JN (2010) Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(5):615鈥?24
5. Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F et al (2006) Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Cancer 5(1):61鈥?5 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-005-2577-1">CrossRef
6. Weitzel JN, McCaffrey SM, Nedelcu R et al (2003) Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. Arch Surg 138(12):1323鈥?329 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1323">CrossRef
7. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP et al (2002) Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 70(3):784鈥?97 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.784">CrossRef
8. Phelps C, Wood F, Bennett P et al (2007) Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. J Genet Couns 16(4):505鈥?14 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9086-3">CrossRef
9. Metcalfe A, Werrett J, Burgess L et al (2009) Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level. Fam Cancer 8(4):403鈥?12 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9256-6">CrossRef
10. Vadaparampil ST, Quinn GP, Brzosowicz J et al (2008) Experiences of genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 among recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a qualitative inquiry. J Psychosoc Oncol 26(4):33鈥?2 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347330802359586">CrossRef
11. Crotser CB, Boehmke M (2009) Survivorship considerations in adults with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: state of the science. J Cancer Surviv 3(1):21鈥?2 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0077-7">CrossRef
12. MacDonald DJ, Sarna L, Weitzel JN et al (2010) Women鈥檚 perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings. J Genet Couns 19(2):148鈥?60 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9267-3">CrossRef
13. Metcalfe KA, Liede A, Hoodfar E et al (2000) An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling. J Med Genet 37(11):866鈥?74 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.37.11.866">CrossRef
14. Metcalfe KA, Liede A, Trinkaus M et al (2002) Evaluation of the needs of spouses of female carriers of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Clin Genet 62(6):464鈥?69 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2002.620607.x">CrossRef
15. Di Prospero LS, Seminsky M, Honeyford J et al (2001) Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey. Can Med Assoc J 164(7):1005鈥?009
16. Werner-Lin A (2008) Formal and informal support needs of young women with BRCA mutations. J Psychosoc Oncol 26(4):111鈥?33 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347330802359776">CrossRef
17. Habrat D, MacDonald DJ, Lagos V et al (2008) Assessing patients鈥?perceptions of genetic cancer risk assessment and post counseling needs. Paper presented at the City of Hope Eugene and Ruth Roberts Summer Student Academy, Duarte, CA, 2008
18. Thewes B, Meiser B, Tucker M et al (2003) The unmet information and support needs of women with a family history of breast cancer: a descriptive study. J Genet Couns 12(1):61鈥?7 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021447201809">CrossRef
19. Hamann HA, Croyle RT, Smith KR et al (2000) Interest in a support group among individuals tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation. J Psychosoc Oncol 18(4):15鈥?7 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J077v18n04_02">CrossRef
20. Dorval M, Maunsell E, Dugas MJ et al (2001) Support groups for people carrying a BRCA mutation. Can Med Assoc J 165(6):740鈥?42
21. Bright Pink (2009) Available at: nk.org/" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.bebrightpink.org/. Accessed February 3 2010
22. FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Inc. (2009) Available at: ngourrisk.org/" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.facingourrisk.org/. Accessed February 3, 2010
23. Sagor R (2000) Guiding school improvement with action research. Vol 100047. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria
24. Frost P (2002) Principles of the action research cycle. In: Ritchie R, Pollard A, Frost P (eds) Action research: a guide for teachers鈥攂urning issues in primary education. National Primary Trust, Birmingham, pp 24鈥?2
25. Meyer J (2000) Using qualitative methods in health related action research. Br Med J 320(7228):178鈥?81 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7228.178">CrossRef
26. McNiff J, Whitehead J (2006) Ch 4: where did action research come from? In: All you need to know about action research. SAGE, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif., pp 36鈥?2
27. Mander R, Cheung NF, Wang X et al (2009) Beginning an action research project to investigate the feasibility of a midwife-led normal birthing unit in China. J Clin Nurs 19:517鈥?26 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02849.x">CrossRef
28. Spetz A, Henriksson R, Salander P (2008) A specialist nurse as a resource for family members to patients with brain tumors: an action research study. Cancer Nurs 31:E18鈥揈26 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000305741.18711.8f">CrossRef
29. Gresty K, Skirton H, Evenden A (2007) Addressing the issue of e-learning and online genetics for health professionals. Nurs Health Sci 9(1):14鈥?2 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00296.x">CrossRef
30. Morrison B, Lilford R (2001) How can action research apply to health services? Qual Health Res 11(4):436鈥?49 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119235">CrossRef
31. Wong DK, Chow SF (2006) Beyond clinical trials and narratives: a participatory action research with cancer patient self-help groups. Patient Educ Couns 60(2):201鈥?05 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.016">CrossRef
32. McKinnon W, Naud S, Ashikaga T et al (2007) Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing. J Genet Couns 16(4):433鈥?56 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9078-8">CrossRef
33. Blazer K, Sand S, Hilario J et al (2009) Using action research to evaluate and innovate a program of personalized cancer genetics training for personalized medicine. Paper presented at the AACE International Cancer Education Conference: The Art and Science of Cancer Education and Evaluation, Houston, TX, 2009. Joint Annual Meeting for AACE CPEN EACE
34. Blazer KR, MacDonald DJ, Culver JO et al (2011) Personalized cancer genetics training for personalized medicine: improving community-based healthcare through a genetically literate workforce. Genet Med 13(9):832鈥?40 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821882b7">CrossRef
35. ACCME (2009) ACCME guide to the accreditation process: demonstrating the implementation of the ACCME鈥檚 updated accreditation criteria. Available at: ndex.cfm/fa/AccreditationProcess.home/AccreditationProcess.cfm" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.accme.org/index.cfm/fa/AccreditationProcess.home/AccreditationProcess.cfm. Accessed June 1, 2010
36. IOM (Institute of Medicine) (2010) Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. National Academies Press, Washington
37. MacDonald DJ, Hurley K, Garcia N et al (2011) Psychosocial well-being in ethnically diverse reproductive age BRCA+ women. Paper presented at the International Society of Nurses in Genetics 24th Annual Education Conference, Montreal, Canada, Oct 17, 2011
38. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77鈥?01 nal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa">CrossRef - 作者单位：Carin R. Espenschied (1)
Deborah J. MacDonald (1)
Julie O. Culver (1)
Sharon Sand (1)
Karen Hurley (2)
Kimberly C. Banks (3)
Jeffrey N. Weitzel (1)
Kathleen R. Blazer (1)
1. Division of Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
2. Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan鈥揔ettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
3. St. Joseph Hospital Cancer Genetics Program, Orange, CA, USA - ISSN：1543-0154
文摘
This paper describes the use of action research in a patient conference to provide updated hereditary cancer information, explore patient and family member needs and experiences related to genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA), elicit feedback on how to improve the GCRA process, and inform future research efforts. Invitees completed GCRA at City of Hope or collaborating facilities and had a BRCA mutation or a strong personal or family history of breast cancer. Action research activities were facilitated by surveys, round table discussions, and reflection time to engage participants, faculty, and researchers in multiple cycles of reciprocal feedback. The multimodal action research design effectively engaged conference participants to share their experiences, needs, and ideas for improvements to the GCRA process. Participants indicated that they highly valued the information and resources provided and desired similar future conferences. The use of action research in a patient conference is an innovative and effective approach to provide health education, elicit experiences, identify and help address needs of high-risk patients and their family members, and generate research hypotheses. Insights gained yielded valuable feedback to inform clinical care, future health services research, and continuing medical education activities. These methods may also be effective in other practice settings.