Developing Quality Indicators for Family Support Services in Community Team-Based Mental Health Care

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：S. Serene Olin (1)
  Krista Kutash (2)
  Michele Pollock (1)
  Barbara J. Burns (3)
  Anne Kuppinger (4)
  Nancy Craig (5)
  Frances Purdy (7)
  Kelsey Armusewicz (1)
  Jennifer Wisdom (6)
  Kimberly E. Hoagwood (1) (5)
  
• 关键词：Quality indicators ; Delphi method ; Family support services ; Child mental health
• 刊名：Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：January 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：41
• 期：1
• 页码：7-20
• 全文大小：229 KB
• 作者单位：S. Serene Olin (1)
  Krista Kutash (2)
  Michele Pollock (1)
  Barbara J. Burns (3)
  Anne Kuppinger (4)
  Nancy Craig (5)
  Frances Purdy (7)
  Kelsey Armusewicz (1)
  Jennifer Wisdom (6)
  Kimberly E. Hoagwood (1) (5)
  
  1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Child Study Center, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
  2. Department of Child and Family Studies, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
  3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
  4. Families Together in New York State, Albany, NY, USA
  5. New York State Office of Mental Health, New York, NY, USA
  7. National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health, Rockville, MD, USA
  6. The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
  
• ISSN：1573-3289

文摘

Quality indicators for programs integrating parent-delivered family support services for children’s mental health have not been systematically developed. Increasing emphasis on accountability under the Affordable Care Act highlights the importance of quality-benchmarking efforts. Using a modified Delphi approach, quality indicators were developed for both program level and family support specialist level practices. These indicators were pilot tested with 21 community-based mental health programs. Psychometric properties of these indicators are reported; variations in program and family support specialist performance suggest the utility of these indicators as tools to guide policies and practices in organizations that integrate parent-delivered family support service components.