Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Procedure with the Seldinger’s Technique for Placement of Implantable Venous Ports

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jianzhong Miao (1)
  Lijun Ji (1)
  Jianjun Lu (1)
  Jianqing Chen (1)
  
• 关键词：TIAP ; Ultrasound guided ; Seldinger’s technique
• 刊名：Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：September 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：70
• 期：1
• 页码：559-563
• 全文大小：166 KB
• 参考文献：1. Bow, E. J., Kilpatrick, M. G., & Clinch, J. J. (1999). Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. / Journal of Clinical Oncology, / 17(4), 1267.
  2. Niederhuber, J. E., et al. (1982). Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. / Surgery, / 92(4), 706-12.
  3. Plumhans, C., Mahnken, A. H., Ocklenburg, C., Keil, S., Behrendt, F. F., Günther, R. W., et al. (2011). Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: Catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. / European Journal of Radiology, / 79(3), 338-42. CrossRef
  4. Teichgr?ber, U. M., et al. (2011). Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. / European Radiology, / 21(6), 1224-232. CrossRef
  5. Seldinger, S. I. (1953). Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. / Acta Radiologica, / 39(5), 368-76. CrossRef
  6. Nocito, A., et al. (2009). Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports. / British Journal of Surgery, / 96(10), 1129-134. CrossRef
  7. Johansson, E., et al. (2009). Patients-perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system–results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. / Supportive Care in Cancer, / 17(2), 137-43. CrossRef
  8. Maki, D. G., Kluger, D. M., & Crnich, C. J. (2006). The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: A systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. / Mayo Clinic Proceedings, / 81(9), 1159-171. CrossRef
  9. Carde, P., et al. (1989). Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus totally implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration: A randomized trial in 100 patients with solid tumors. / European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, / 25(6), 939-44. CrossRef
  10. Mueller, B. U., et al. (1992). A prospective randomized trial comparing the infectious and noninfectious complications of an externalized catheter versus a subcutaneously implanted device in cancer patients. / Journal of Clinical Oncology, / 10(12), 1943-948.
  11. Hooda, B., et al. (2008). Implantable port devices are catheters of choice for administration of chemotherapy in pediatric oncology patients-a clinical experience in Pakistan. / Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, / 1138, 43-6. CrossRef
  12. Povoski, S. P. (2000). A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients. / Annals of Surgical Oncology, / 7(7), 496-02. CrossRef
  13. Silberzweig, J. E., et al. (2000). Reporting standards for central venous access. Technology Assessment Committee. / Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, / 11(3), 391-00. CrossRef
  14. Gebauer, B., et al. (2009). Combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy guided port catheter implantation–high success and low complication rate. / European Journal of Radiology, / 69(3), 517-22. CrossRef
  15. Teichgr?ber, U. K., et al. (2003). Central venous access catheters: Radiological management of complications. / Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, / 26(4), 321-33.
  16. Hind, D., et al. (2003). Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: Meta-analysis. / British Medical Journal, / 327(7411), 361. CrossRef
  17. Biffi, R., et al. (2009). Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: A randomized trial. / Annals of Oncology, / 20(5), 935-40. CrossRef
  18. Di Carlo, I., et al. (2010). Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. / Annals of Surgical Oncology, / 17(6), 1649-656. CrossRef
  19. Karakitsos, D., et al. (2006). Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: A prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. / Critical Care, / 10(6), R162. CrossRef
  20. Nelson, B. E., et al. (1994). Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies. / Gynecologic Oncology, / 53(1), 98-02. CrossRef
  21. Harvey, W. H., et al. (1989). A prospective evaluation of the Port-A-Cath implantable venous access system in chronically ill adults and children. / Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, / 169(6), 495-00.
  22. Keum, D. Y., Kim, J. B., & Chae, M. C. (2013). Safety of a totally implantable central venous port system with percutaneous subclavian vein access. / Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, / 46(3), 202-07. CrossRef
  23. Behrendt, F. F., et al. (2006). Evaluation of catheter loops in central venous port systems. / Investigative Radiology, / 41(11), 777-80. CrossRef
  24. Caers, J., et al. (2005). Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. / Supportive Care in Cancer, / 13(5), 325-31. CrossRef
  25. Cil, B. E., et al. (2006). Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: A single center experience. / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, / 12(2), 93-8.
  26. Lorch, H., et al. (2001). Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: Experience with 125 consecutive patients. / Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, / 24(3), 180-84. CrossRef
  27. Funaki, B., et al. (1997). Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. / American Journal of Roentgenology, / 169(5), 1431-434. CrossRef
  28. Yip, D., & Funaki, B. (2002). Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients. / Acta Radiologica, / 43(4), 371-75. CrossRef
  29. Strum, S., et al. (1986). Improved methods for venous access: The Port-A-Cath, a totally implanted catheter system. / Journal of Clinical Oncology, / 4(4), 596-03.
  30. Kock, H. J., et al. (1998). Implantable vascular access systems: Experience in 1,500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. / World Journal of Surgery, / 22(1), 12-6. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Jianzhong Miao (1)
  Lijun Ji (1)
  Jianjun Lu (1)
  Jianqing Chen (1)
  
  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangyin People’s Hospital, Jiangyin, 214400, China
  
• ISSN：1559-0283

文摘

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare ultrasound-guided procedure with the Seldinger’s technique for placement of implantable venous ports. A total of 214 patients were randomized to receive TIAP placement by either ultrasound-guided procedure or the Seldinger’s technique. Complications and pain perception were compared between these two groups. No severe perioperative or periinterventional complication occurred. Significantly (P?