Difference in correspondence between visual field defect and inner macular layer thickness measured using three types of spectral-domain OCT instruments

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kaori Ueda ; Akiyasu Kanamori ; Azusa Akashi…
• 关键词：Spectral ; domain optical coherence tomography ; Inner macular layer thickness ; Visual field ; Structure–function relationship
• 刊名：Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：January 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：59
• 期：1
• 页码：55-64
• 全文大小：1,263 KB
• 参考文献：1. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701-3 (discussion 829-0). dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.6.701" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  2. Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:688-10. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  3. Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Hoffmann EM, et al. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1593-02. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  4. Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Ye C, Cheung CY, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1551-. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.035" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  5. Leite MT, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, et al. Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(85-2):e1.
  6. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Tomioka M, Kawaka Y, Yamada Y, Negi A. Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:832-. dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301084" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  7. Lee JR, Jeoung JW, Choi J, Choi JY, Park KH, Kim YD. Structure–function relationships in normal and glaucomatous eyes determined by time- and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6424-0. dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5130" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  8. Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S, Yun SC, Kang SY, Choi J, et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6401-. dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5035" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  9. Aptel F, Sayous R, Fortoul V, Beccat S, Denis P. Structure-function relationships using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: comparison with scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:825-3. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.011" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  10. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Leite MT, Sample PA, Medeiros FA. Structure–function relationship in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:864-1. dx.doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.145" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  11. Takagishi M, Hirooka K, Baba T, Mizote M, Shiraga F. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual field sensitivity. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:383-. dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efb371" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  12. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Tomioka M, Kawaka Y, Yamada Y, Negi A. Structure–function relationship among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:e196-02. dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12028" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2012-. dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0335" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  14. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300:5-5. dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903000103" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  15. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Op
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Ophthalmology
  
• 出版者：Springer Japan
• ISSN：1613-2246

文摘

Purpose To compare the relationship between visual field sensitivity (VFS) and macular parameters measured using three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments and to determine a base level (=floor effect) for macular parameters. Methods We imaged 127 glaucomatous eyes (1 eye per subject) using three different OCT instruments, i.e., the Cirrus, RTVue and 3D OCT devices; 76 normal eyes were evaluated as controls using the same instruments. The thicknesses of the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell layer+inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL), and mRNFL+GCL/IPL (GCC) were analyzed. The VFS of the area analyzed by OCT was expressed in decibels and the 1/Lambert scale. For each parameter, the structure–function relationship and the base level were evaluated by regression analysis. The strength of the correlations between the instruments was compared by the bootstrapping method. Results All of the macular parameters evaluated exhibited statistically significant correlations with VFS. The average GCC measured by all three SD-OCT instruments and the average mRNFL thickness measured by the Cirrus and 3D OCT instruments had similar correlations with VFS. The average GCL/IPL thickness measured by the Cirrus OCT instrument was better correlated with VFS that was measured by the 3D OCT instrument (p?=?0.031). The base level GCC thickness measured by all three instruments was approximately 65?% of that of normal eyes. The base level mRNFL thickness measured with the Cirrus and OCT instruments was 52? and 48 %, respectively, of that of normal eyes. The base level GCL/IPL thickness measured with the Cirrus and 3D instruments was 71 and 75?%, respectively, of that of normal eyes. Conclusions The three SD-OCT instruments evaluated showed similar structure–function relationships in terms of GCC and mRNFL measurements. The base levels of the macular parameters determined by the three instruments differed, due, at least partly, to the scanning area defined by each instrument.