Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs among infants and children exposed in utero or during breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Andrea C Tricco (1)
    Elise Cogo (1)
    Veroniki A Angeliki (1)
    Charlene Soobiah (1) (2)
    Brian Hutton (3)
    Brenda R Hemmelgarn (4)
    David Moher (3)
    Yaron Finkelstein (5) (6) (7)
    Sharon E Straus (1) (8)

    1. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute
    ; St. Michael鈥檚 Hospital ; 209 Victoria Street ; East Building ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5B 1聽T8 ; Canada
    2. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation
    ; University of Toronto ; Health Sciences Building ; 155 College Street ; Suite 425 ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5T 3聽M6 ; Canada
    3. Clinical Epidemiology Program
    ; Centre for Practice-Changing Research ; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; The Ottawa Hospital 鈥?General Campus and University of Ottawa ; 501 Smyth Road ; Box 711 ; Ottawa ; Ontario ; K1H 8聽L6 ; Canada
    4. Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences
    ; University of Calgary ; TRW Building ; 3rd Floor ; 3280 Hospital Drive NW ; Calgary ; Alberta ; T2N 4Z6 ; Canada
    5. The Hospital for Sick Children
    ; 555 University Avenue ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5G 1X8 ; Canada
    6. Department of Pediatrics
    ; University of Toronto ; 172 St. George Street ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5R 0A3 ; Canada
    7. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
    ; University of Toronto ; Medical Sciences Building ; 1 King鈥檚 College Circle ; Room 4207 ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5S 1A8 ; Canada
    8. Department of Geriatric Medicine
    ; University of Toronto ; 172 St. George Street ; Toronto ; Ontario ; M5R 0A3 ; Canada
  • 关键词:Anti ; epileptic drug ; Breastfeeding ; Comparative safety ; Congenital malformation ; Epilepsy ; Fetus ; Infant ; Network meta ; analysis ; Pregnancy ; Systematic review
  • 刊名:Systematic Reviews
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:December 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:3
  • 期:1
  • 全文大小:272 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Hauser, WA, Hesdorffer, D (1990) Epilepsy, Frequency, Causes and Consequences. Demos Publications, New York
    2. Wiebe, S, Bellhouse, DR, Fallahay, C, Eliasziw, M (1999) Burden of epilepsy: the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Neurol Sci 26: pp. 263-270
    3. Sperling, MR (2004) The consequences of uncontrolled epilepsy. CNS Spectr 9: pp. 98-101
    4. Jones, MW (1998) Consequences of epilepsy: why do we treat seizures?. Can J Neurol Sci 25: pp. S24-S26
    5. Dickenson, AH, Ghandehari, J (2007) Anti-convulsants and anti-depressants. Handb Exp Pharmacol 177: pp. 145-177 CrossRef
    6. Stefani, A, Spadoni, F, Bernardi, G (1997) Voltage-activated calcium channels: targets of antiepileptic drug therapy?. Epilepsia 38: pp. 959-965 CrossRef
    7. Snutch, TP, Reiner, PB (1992) Ca2+ channels: diversity of form and function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2: pp. 247-253 CrossRef
    8. Spina, E, Perugi, G (2004) Antiepileptic drugs: indications other than epilepsy. Epileptic Disord 6: pp. 57-75
    9. Harden, CL, Pennell, PB, Koppel, BS, Hovinga, CA, Gidal, B, Meador, KJ, Hopp, J, Ting, TY, Hauser, WA, Thurman, D, Kaplan, PW, Robinson, JN, French, JA, Wiebe, S, Wilner, AN, Vazquez, B, Holmes, L, Krumholz, A, Finnell, R, Shafer, PO, Le Guen, CL (2009) Management issues for women with epilepsy鈥揻ocus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): III. Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breast-feeding: report of the quality standards subcommittee and therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia 50: pp. 1247-1255 CrossRef
    10. Harden, CL, Meador, KJ, Pennell, PB, Hauser, WA, Gronseth, GS, French, JA, Wiebe, S, Thurman, D, Koppel, BS, Kaplan, PW, Robinson, JN, Hopp, J, Ting, TY, Gidal, B, Hovinga, CA, Wilner, AN, Vazquez, B, Holmes, L, Krumholz, A, Finnell, R, Hirtz, D, Le Guen, C (2009) Management issues for women with epilepsy-Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia 50: pp. 1237-1246 CrossRef
    11. Samren, EB, van Duijn, CM, Koch, S, Hiilesmaa, VK, Klepel, H, Bardy, AH, Mannagetta, GB, Deichl, AW, Gaily, E, Granstrom, ML, Meinardi, H, Grobbee, DE, Hofman, A, Janz, D, Lindhout, D (1997) Maternal use of antiepileptic drugs and the risk of major congenital malformations: a joint European prospective study of human teratogenesis associated with maternal epilepsy. Epilepsia 38: pp. 981-990 CrossRef
    12. Meador, K, Reynolds, MW, Crean, S, Fahrbach, K, Probst, C (2008) Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts. Epilepsy Res 81: pp. 1-13 CrossRef
    13. Adab, N, Jacoby, A, Smith, D, Chadwick, D (2001) Additional educational needs in children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70: pp. 15-21 CrossRef
    14. Adab, N, Kini, U, Vinten, J, Ayres, J, Baker, G, Clayton-Smith, J, Coyle, H, Fryer, A, Gorry, J, Gregg, J, Mawer, G, Nicolaides, P, Pickering, L, Tunnicliffe, L, Chadwick, DW (2004) The longer term outcome of children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: pp. 1575-1583 CrossRef
    15. Gaily, E, Kantola-Sorsa, E, Hiilesmaa, V, Isoaho, M, Matila, R, Kotila, M, Nylund, T, Bardy, A, Kaaja, E, Granstrom, ML (2004) Normal intelligence in children with prenatal exposure to carbamazepine. Neurology 62: pp. 28-32 CrossRef
    16. Meador, KJ, Baker, GA, Browning, N, Clayton-Smith, J, Combs-Cantrell, DT, Cohen, M, Kalayjian, LA, Kanner, A, Liporace, JD, Pennell, PB, Privitera, M, Loring, DW (2009) Cognitive function at 3聽years of age after fetal exposure to antiepileptic drugs. N Engl J Med 360: pp. 1597-1605 CrossRef
    17. Holmes, LB, Wyszynski, DF, Lieberman, E (2004) The AED (antiepileptic drug) pregnancy registry: a 6-year experience. Arch Neurol 61: pp. 673-678 CrossRef
    18. Reinisch, JM, Sanders, SA, Mortensen, EL, Rubin, DB (1995) In utero exposure to phenobarbital and intelligence deficits in adult men. JAMA 274: pp. 1518-1525 CrossRef
    19. Morrow, J, Russell, A, Guthrie, E, Parsons, L, Robertson, I, Waddell, R, Irwin, B, McGivern, RC, Morrison, PJ, Craig, J (2006) Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a prospective study from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77: pp. 193-198 CrossRef
    20. Meador, KJ, Baker, GA, Finnell, RH, Kalayjian, LA, Liporace, JD, Loring, DW, Mawer, G, Pennell, PB, Smith, JC, Wolff, MC (2006) In utero antiepileptic drug exposure: fetal death and malformations. Neurology 67: pp. 407-412 CrossRef
    21. Vajda, FJ, Hitchcock, A, Graham, J, Solinas, C, O鈥橞rien, TJ, Lander, CM, Eadie, MJ (2006) Foetal malformations and seizure control: 52聽months data of the Australian Pregnancy Registry. Eur J Neurol 13: pp. 645-654 CrossRef
    22. Holmes, LB, Baldwin, EJ, Smith, CR, Habecker, E, Glassman, L, Wong, SL, Wyszynski, DF (2008) Increased frequency of isolated cleft palate in infants exposed to lamotrigine during pregnancy. Neurology 70: pp. 2152-2158 CrossRef
    23. Meador, KJ, Penovich, P, Baker, GA, Pennell, PB, Bromfield, E, Pack, A, Liporace, JD, Sam, M, Kalayjian, LA, Thurman, DJ, Moore, E, Loring, DW (2009) Antiepileptic drug use in women of childbearing age. Epilepsy Behav 15: pp. 339-343 CrossRef
    24. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Review Protocols. / 19th Cochrane Colloquium: 19鈥?2 October 2011; Madrid, Spain
    25. Ross, CJ, Visscher, H, Sistonen, J, Brunham, LR, Pussegoda, K, Loo, TT, Rieder, MJ, Koren, G, Carleton, BC, Hayden, MR (2010) The Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety: a model for safety pharmacology. Thyroid 20: pp. 681-687 CrossRef
    26. Eypasch, E, Lefering, R, Kum, CK, Troidl, H (1995) Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder. BMJ 311: pp. 619-620 CrossRef
    27. Atkins, D (2007) Creating and synthesizing evidence with decision makers in mind: integrating evidence from clinical trials and other study designs. Med Care 45: pp. S16-S22 CrossRef
    28. / Health Canada: Drug Product Database. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/databasdon/index-eng.php
    29. / United States National Library of Medicine鈥檚 ChemIDPlus Lite Database. lite.jsp" class="a-plus-plus">http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/chemidlite.jsp
    30. / Canadian Pharmacists Association: E-CPS (Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties). http://www.e-therapeutics.ca/home.whatsnew.action
    31. / Epilepsy Canada: Anticonvulsant Medications. http://www.epilepsy.ca/en-CA/Diagnosis-and-Treatment/Anticonvulsant-Medications.html
    32. / Epilepsy Ontario: Anticonvulsant/Anti-Seizure Medication from A to Z. http://epilepsyontario.org/anticonvulsantanti-seizure-medication-from-a-to-z/
    33. Sampson, M, McGowan, J, Cogo, E, Grimshaw, J, Moher, D, Lefebvre, C (2009) An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 62: pp. 944-952 linepi.2008.10.012" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    34. / Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health: Grey Matters: A Practical Search Tool for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cadth.ca/resources/grey-matters
    35. Adab, N, Tudur, SC, Vinten, J, Williamson, P, Winterbottom, J (2004) Common antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy in women with epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: pp. CD004848
    36. Banach, R, Boskovic, R, Einarson, T, Koren, G (2010) Long-term developmental outcome of children of women with epilepsy, unexposed or exposed prenatally to antiepileptic drugs: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Drug Saf 33: pp. 73-79 CrossRef
    37. Landis, JR, Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: pp. 159-174 CrossRef
    38. / Synthesi.SR. knowledgetranslation.ca/sysrev/login.php" class="a-plus-plus">http://knowledgetranslation.ca/sysrev/login.php
    39. Stone, PW (2002) Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res 15: pp. 197-198 CrossRef
    40. / Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Draft Risk of Bias Tool. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-author-resources
    41. / The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. linical_epidemiology/oxford.asp" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
    42. Santaguida, PL, Raina, P, Ismaila, A (2008) The Development of the McHarm Quality Assessment Scale for Adverse Events. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
    43. Raudenbush, SW Analyzing Effect Sizes: Random Effects Models. In: Cooper, H, Hedges, LV, Valentine, JC eds. (2009) The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 295-315
    44. Viechtbauer, W (2005) Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat 30: pp. 261-293 CrossRef
    45. Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21: pp. 1539-1558 CrossRef
    46. Viechtbauer, W (2007) Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 26: pp. 37-52 CrossRef
    47. Higgins, JPT, Green, S (2009) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
    48. Sweeting, MJ, Sutton, AJ, Lambert, PC (2004) What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 23: pp. 1351-1375 CrossRef
    49. Bradburn, MJ, Deeks, JJ, Berlin, JA, Russell Localio, A (2007) Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 26: pp. 53-77 CrossRef
    50. Littell, JH, Corcoran, J, Pillai, V (2008) Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York CrossRef
    51. Carpenter, J, Rucker, G, Schwarzer, G (2011) Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach. Biometrics 67: pp. 1066-1072 CrossRef
    52. / Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/
    53. Salanti, G, Ades, AE, Ioannidis, JP (2011) Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 64: pp. 163-171 linepi.2010.03.016" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
    54. Salanti, G (2012) Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods 3: pp. 80-97 CrossRef
    55. Song, F, Altman, DG, Glenny, AM, Deeks, JJ (2003) Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 326: pp. 472 CrossRef
    56. Veroniki, AA, Vasiliadis, HS, Higgins, JP, Salanti, G (2013) Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. Int J Epidemiol 42: pp. 332-345 CrossRef
    57. Dias, S, Welton, NJ, Caldwell, DM, Ades, AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29: pp. 932-944 CrossRef
    58. White, IR, Barrett, JK, Jackson, D, Higgins, JPT (2012) Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods 3: pp. 111-125 CrossRef
    59. Jackson, D, Barrett, JK, Stephen, R, White, IR, Higgins, JPT (2014) A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects. Stat Med.
    60. White, IR (2011) Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: updates to mvmeta. Stata J 11: pp. 255-270
    61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: / Unintended Pregnancy Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/
    62. Yerby, MS (1994) Pregnancy, teratogenesis, and epilepsy. Neurol Clin 12: pp. 749-771
  • 刊物主题:Medicine/Public Health, general; Biomedicine general; Statistics for Life Sciences, Medicine, Health Sciences;
  • 出版者:BioMed Central
  • ISSN:2046-4053
文摘
Background Epilepsy affects about 1% of the general population. Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) prevent or terminate seizures in individuals with epilepsy. Pregnant women with epilepsy may continue taking AEDs. Many of these agents cross the placenta and increase the risk of major congenital malformations, early cognitive and developmental delays, and infant mortality. We aim to evaluate the comparative safety of AEDs approved for chronic use in Canada when administered to pregnant and breastfeeding women and the effects on their infants and children through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods Studies examining the effects of AEDs administered to pregnant and breastfeeding women regardless of indication (e.g., epilepsy, migraine, pain, psychiatric disorders) on their infants and children will be included. We will include randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, non-RCTs, controlled before-after, interrupted time series, cohort, registry, and case-control studies. The main literature search will be executed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will seek unpublished literature through searches of trial protocol registries and conference abstracts. The literature search results screening, data abstraction, and risk of bias appraisal will be performed by two individuals, independently. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The risk of bias of experimental and quasi-experimental studies will be appraised using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Risk-of-Bias tool, methodological quality of observational studies will be appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and quality of reporting of safety outcomes will be conducted using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms (McHarm) tool. If feasible and appropriate, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis will be considered for outcomes that fulfill network meta-analysis assumptions. The primary outcome is major congenital malformations (overall and by specific types), while secondary outcomes include fetal loss/miscarriage, minor congenital malformations (overall and by specific types), cognitive development, psychomotor development, small for gestational age, preterm delivery, and neonatal seizures. Discussion Our systematic review will address safety concerns regarding the use of AEDs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Our results will be useful to healthcare providers, policy-makers, and women of childbearing age who are taking anti-epileptic medications. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014008925.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700