Assessing software product line potential: an exploratory industrial case study
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Heiko Koziolek ; Thomas Goldschmidt ; Thijmen de Gooijer…
  • 关键词:Software product lines ; Domain analysis ; Business case
  • 刊名:Empirical Software Engineering
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:April 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:21
  • 期:2
  • 页码:411-448
  • 全文大小:1,318 KB
  • 参考文献:Ahnassay A, Bagheri E, Gasevic D (2013) Empirical evaluation in software product line engineering. Tech. rep., Laboratory for Systems, Software and Semantics. Ryerson University . http://​ls3.​rnet.​ryerson.​ca/​wp-content/​uploads/​2013/​08/​TR-LS3-130084R4T.​pdf
    America P, Thiel S, Ferber S, Mergel M (2001) Introduction to domain analysis, http://​www.​ibrarian.​net/​navon/​paper/​Introduction_​to_​Domain_​Analysis_​Pierre_​America_​_​e.​pdf?​paperid=​15855122
    Bayer J, Flege O, Knauber P, Laqua R, Muthig D, Schmid K, Widen T, DeBaud JM (1999) Pulse: A methodology to develop software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR ’99, pp 122–131. ACM, New York
    Birk A, Heller G, John I, Schmid K, von der Massen T, Muller K (2003) Product line engineering, the state of the practice. IEEE Softw 20(6):52–60. doi:10.​1109/​MS.​2003.​1241367 CrossRef
    Boeckle G, Clements P, McGregor J, Muthig D, Schmid K (2004) Calculating roi for software product lines, vol 21, pp 23–31
    Boehm BW, Clark H, Brown RC, Madachy R, Steece B (2000) Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom, 1st edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River
    Bosch J (2001) Software product lines: Organizational alternatives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’01, pp 91–100. IEEE Computer Society, Washington . http://​dl.​acm.​org/​citation.​cfm?​id=​381473.​381482
    Breivold HP, Larsson S, Land R (2008) Migrating industrial systems towards software product lines: Experiences and observations through case studies. In: Proceedings of the 2008 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA ’08, pp 232–239. IEEE Computer Society, Washington
    Buhr RJA (1998) Use case maps as architectural entities for complex systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(12):1131–1155. doi:10.​1109/​32.​738343 CrossRef
    Capilla R (2005) Using map for recovering the architecture of web systems of a spanish insurance company. International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice 0:92–101. doi:10.​1109/​STEP.​2005.​33
    Carnegie Mellon University - Software Engineering Institute (2013) Product Line Hall of Fame. http://​splc.​net/​fame.​html . Last visited 2013-01-21
    Carnegie Mellon University - Software Engineering Institute (2013) Software Product Lines. http://​www.​sei.​cmu.​edu/​productlines/​ . Last visited 2013-01-21
    Chrissis MB, Konrad M, Shrum S (2003) CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley
    Clements P, Northrop L (2001) Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley
    Davis T (1993) The reuse capability model: a basis for improving an organization’s reuse capability. In: Software Reusability, 1993. Proceedings Advances in Software Reuse, Selected Papers from the Second International Workshop on, pp 126 –133. doi:10.​1109/​ASR.​1993.​291710
    Domis D, Sehestedt S, Gamer T, Aleksy M, Koziolek H (2014) Customizing domain analysis for assessing the reuse potential of industrial software systems. In: Proceedings of 18th Internal Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2014), Industry Track. ACM
    Ducasse S, Pollet D (2009) Software architecture reconstruction: A process-oriented taxonomy. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 35(4):573–591CrossRef
    Eisenbarth T, Simon D (2001) Guiding feature asset mining for software product line development In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Product Line Engineering: The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing, Erfurt, Germany, Fraunhofer IESE, pp 1–4
    Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
    Fairbanks G (2010) Just Enough Software Architecture: A Risk-Driven Approach, 1st edn. Marshall & Brainerd
    Frenzel P, Koschke R, Breu APJ, Angstmann K (2007) Extending the reflexion method for consolidating software variants into product lines. In: Proceedings of the 14th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, WCRE ’07, pp 160–169. IEEE Computer Society, WashingtonCrossRef
    Ganesan D, Knodel J (2005) Identifying domain-specific reusable components from existing oo systems to support product line migration. In: Proceedings First International Workshop on Reengineering towards Product Lines, R2PL 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 16–20
    Groene B (2012) Introducing architecture modeling at a big software product company. In: Proceedings Praxisforum Modellierung 2012 http://​qfam.​gi.​de/​fileadmin/​user_​upload/​PraxiforumModell​ierung2012/​Introducing-architecture-modeling-at-a-big-software-product-company_​Groene.​pdf
    Guo GY, Atlee JM, Kazman R (1999) A software architecture reconstruction method. In:Proceedings of the TC2 First Working IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA1), WICSA1, pp 15–34. Kluwer, B.V., Deventer. http://​dl.​acm.​org/​citation.​cfm?​id=​646545.​696370
    Harhurin A, Hartmann J (2008) Service-oriented commonality analysis across existing systems. In: Software Product Line Conference, 2008. SPLC ’08. 12th International, pp 255–264 doi:10.​1109/​SPLC.​2008.​19
    Hariri N, Castro-Herrera C, Mirakhorli M, Cleland-Huang J, Mobasher B (2013) Supporting domain analysis through mining and recommending features from online product listings. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39(12):1736–1752. doi:10.​1109/​TSE.​2013.​39 CrossRef
    Holmes R, Walker RJ (2013) Systematizing pragmatic software reuse. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 21(4):20:1–20:44. doi:10.​1145/​2377656.​2377657
    John I, Knodel J, Lehner T, Muthig D (2006) A practical guide to product line scoping. In: Software Product Line Conference, 2006 10th International, pp 3–12 doi:10.​1109/​SPLINE.​2006.​1691572
    Jones LG, Northrop LM (2010) Clearing the way for software product line success. IEEE Softw 27(3):22–28. doi:10.​1109/​MS.​2010.​71 CrossRef
    Kazman R, Carrière SJ (1999) Playing detective: Reconstructing software architecture from available evidence. Autom Softw Eng 6(2):107–138CrossRef
    Khurum M, Gorschek T (2009) A systematic review of domain analysis solutions for product lines. J Syst Softw 82(12):1982–2003. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jss.​2009.​06.​048 CrossRef
    Knauber P, Muthig D, Schmid K, Widen T (2000) Applying product line concepts in small and medium-sized companies. IEEE Softw 17(5):88–95. doi:10.​1109/​52.​877873 CrossRef
    Knoepfel A, Groene B, Tabeling P (2006) Fundamental Modeling Concepts: Effective Communication of IT Systems. Wiley
    Koziolek H, Goldschmidt T, de Gooijer T, Domis D, Sehestedt S (2013) Experiences from identifying software reuse opportunities by domain analysis. In: Proceedings of the 17th Internal Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2013), Industry Track. ACM
    Koziolek H, Weiss R, Doppelhamer J (2009) Evolving Industrial Software Architectures into a Software Product Line: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conf. on the Quality of Software Architecture (QoSA’09), LNCS, vol 5581, pp 177–193. Springer
    Krueger CW (2002) Easing the transition to software mass customization. In: Revised Papers from the 4th International Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering, PFE ’01, pp 282–293. Springer-Verlag, London. http://​dl.​acm.​org/​citation.​cfm?​id=​648114.​748909 CrossRef
    van der Linden FJ, Schmid K, Rommes E (2007) Software Product Lines in Action: The Best Industrial Practice in Product Line Engineering. Springer
    Neighbors JM (1984) The draco approach to constructing software from reusable components. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 5:564–574CrossRef
    Northrop L, Jones L, Donohoe P (2005) Examining product line readiness: Experiences with the sei product line technical probe. https://​resources.​sei.​cmu.​edu/​asset_​files/​Presentation/​2005_​017_​001_​23904.​pdf
    Pinzger M, Gall H, Girard JF, Knodel J, Riva C, Pasman W, Broerse C, Wijnstra J (2004) Architecture recovery for product families. In: van der Linden F (ed) Software Product-Family Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014, pp 332–351. Springer, Berlin
    Pohl K, Boeckle G, van der Linden FJ (2005) Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer
    Poulin JS (1996) Measuring Software Reuse: Principles, Practices, and Economic Models, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional
    Prieto-Diaz R, Arango G (1991) Domain Analysis and Software Systems Modeling. IEEE Computer Society Press
    Rubin J, Chechik M (2013) A survey of feature location techniques. In: Domain Engineering, pp 29–58. Springer
    Runeson P, Höst M (2009) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw Engg 14(2):131–164. doi:10.​1007/​s10664-008-9102-8 CrossRef
    Schmid K (2002) A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’02, pp 593–603. ACM, New YorkCrossRef
    Schmid K, John I, Kolb R, Meier G (2005) Introducing the pulse approach to an embedded system population at testo ag. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’05, pp 544–552. ACM, New York
    Simos M, Creps D, Klingler C, Levine L, Allemang D (1996) Organization domain modeling (odm) guidebook, version 2.0. Tech. Rep. STARS-VC-A025/001/00, Lockheed Martin Tactical Defence Systems, United States of America
    Stoermer C, O’Brien L (2001) Map - mining architectures for product line evaluations. In: Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2001, pp 35–44. doi:10.​1109/​WICSA.​2001.​948405
    Van Deursen A, Klint P, Visser J (2000) Domain-specific languages: An annotated bibliography. SIGPLAN Not 35(6):26–36CrossRef
    Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications Ltd
  • 作者单位:Heiko Koziolek (1)
    Thomas Goldschmidt (1)
    Thijmen de Gooijer (1)
    Dominik Domis (1)
    Stephan Sehestedt (1)
    Thomas Gamer (1)
    Markus Aleksy (1)

    1. ABB Corporate Research, 68526, Ladenburg, Germany
  • 刊物类别:Computer Science
  • 刊物主题:Software Engineering, Programming and Operating Systems
    Programming Languages, Compilers and Interpreters
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-7616
文摘
Corporate organizations sometimes offer similar software products in certain domains due to former company mergers or due to the complexity of the organization. The functional overlap of such products is an opportunity for future systematic reuse to reduce software development and maintenance costs. Therefore, we have tailored existing domain analysis methods to our organization to identify commonalities and variabilities among such products and to assess the potential for software product line (SPL) approaches. As an exploratory case study, we report on our experiences and lessons learned from conducting the domain analysis in four application cases with large-scale software products. We learned that the outcome of a domain analysis was often a smaller integration scenario instead of an SPL and that business case calculations were less relevant for the stakeholders and managers from the business units during this phase. We also learned that architecture reconstruction using a simple block diagram notation aids domain analysis and that large parts of our approach were reusable across application cases.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700