Update on Liposuction: Laser-Assisted Liposuction Versus Tumescent Liposuction

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Christie G. Regula (1)
  Naomi Lawrence (1)
  
• 关键词：Laser lipolysis ; Laser ; assisted liposuction ; Tumescent liposuction ; Nd ; YAG laser ; Body contouring
• 刊名：Current Dermatology Reports
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：June 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：3
• 期：2
• 页码：127-134
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Flynn TC, Coleman 2nd WP, Field LM, Klein JA, Hanke CW. History of liposuction. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(6):515-0. CrossRef
  2. Klein JA. The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. Am J Cosmet Surg. 1987;4:263-.
  3. Klein JA. Anesthesia for liposuction in dermatologic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;14:1124-2. CrossRef
  4. Klein JA. The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. 1990;8:425-7.
  5. Lillis PJ. Liposuction surgery under local anesthesia: limited blood loss and minimal lidocaine absorption. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1998;14:1145-. CrossRef
  6. Berstein G, Hanke CW. Safety of liposuction: a review of 9478 cases performed by dermatologists. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;14(10):1112-. CrossRef
  7. Hanke CW, Berstein G, Bullock S. Safety of tumescent liposuction in 15,336 patients. National survey results. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(5):459-2. CrossRef
  8. Housman TS, Lawrence N, Mellen BG, George MN, Filippo JA, Cerveny KA, et al. The safety of liposuction: results of a national survey. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(11):971-. CrossRef
  9. Hanke W, Cox SE, Kuznets N, Coleman 3rd WP. Tumescent liposuction report performance measurement initiative: national survey results. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(7):967-7. CrossRef
  10. Grazer FM, de Jong RH. Fatal outcomes from liposuction: census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):436-6. CrossRef
  11. Starling 3rd J, Thosani MK, Coldiron BM. Determining the safety of office-based surgery: what 10?years of Florida data and 6?years of Alabama data reveal. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2):171-. / Review of safety data revealing ten deaths associated with liposuction. All were performed under general anesthesia, and none were performed by dermatologists. CrossRef
  12. Hanke CW, Coleman 3rd WP, Lillis PJ, Narins RS, Buening JA, Rosemark J, et al. Infusion rates and levels of premedication in tumescent liposuction. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(12):1131-. CrossRef
  13. Beeson WH, Slama TG, Beeler RT, Rachel JD, Picerno NA. Group A streptococcal fasciitis after submental tumescent liposuction. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3(4):277-. CrossRef
  14. Nagelvoort RW, Hulstaert PF, Kon M, Schuurman AH. Necrotising fasciitis and myositis as serious complications after liposuction. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002;146(50):2430-.
  15. McBean JC, Katz BE. Laser lipolysis: an update. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4(7):25-4.
  16. Badin AZ, Gondek LB, Garcia MJ, Valle LC, Flizikowski FB, de Noronha L. Analysis of laser lipolysis effects on human tissue samples obtained from liposuction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2005;29(4):281-. CrossRef
  17. Neira R, Arroyave J, Ramirez H, Ortiz CL, Solarte E, Sequeda F, et al. Fat liquefaction: effect of low-level laser energy on adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):912-2. CrossRef
  18. Mordon SR, Wassmer B, Reynaud JP, Zemmouri J. Mathematical modeling of laser lipolysis. Biomed Eng Online. 2008;7:10. CrossRef
  19. Badin AZ, Moraes LM, Gondek L, Chiaratti MG, Canta L. Laser lipolysis: flaccidity under control. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2002;26(5):335-. CrossRef
  20. Ichikawa K, Miyasaka M, Tanaka R, Tanino R, Mizukami K, Wakaki M. Histologic evaluation of the pulsed Nd:YAG laser for laser lipolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36(1):43-. CrossRef
  21. Goldman A. Submental Nd:Yag laser-assisted liposuction. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(3):181-. CrossRef
  22. Apfelberg DB. Results of multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23(4):713-.
  23. Apfelberg DB, Rosenthal S, Hunstad JP, Achauer B, Fodor PB. Progress report on multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1994;18(3):259-4. CrossRef
  24. Apfelberg D. Laser-assisted liposuction may benefit surgeons, patients. Clin Laser Mon. 1992;10(12):193-.
  25. Neira R, Ortiz-Neira C. Low-level laser-assisted liposculpture: clinical report of 700 cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(5):451-. CrossRef
  26. Goldman AG, Schavelzon D, Blugerman G. Liposuction using neodymium-yttrium-garnet laser. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:2497.
  27. Kim KH, Geronemus RG. Laser lipolysis using a novel 1,064?nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(2):241-. CrossRef
  28. Sun Y, Wu SF, Yan S, Shi HY, Chen D, Chen Y. Laser lipolysis used to treat localized adiposis: a preliminary report on experience with Asian patients. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33(5):701-. CrossRef
  29. Rho YK, Kim BJ, Kim MN, Kang KS, Han HJ. Laser lipolysis with pulsed 1064?nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of gynecomastia. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48(12):1353-. CrossRef
  30. Dudelzak J, Hussain M, Goldberg DJ. Laser lipolysis of the arm, with and without suction aspiration: clinical and histologic changes. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;11(2):70-. CrossRef
  31. Goldman A, Gotkin RH, Sarnoff DA, Prati C, Rossato F. Cellulite: a new treatment approach combining subdermal Nd: YAG laser lipolysis and autologous fat transplantation. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(6):656-2. CrossRef
  32. DiBernardo BE, Reyes J. Evaluation of skin tightening after laser-assisted liposuction. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29(5):400-. CrossRef
  33. Goldman A, Gotkin RH. Laser-assisted liposuction. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:241-3. CrossRef
  34. McBean JC, Katz BE. A pilot study of the efficacy of a 1,064 and 1,320?nm sequentially firing Nd:YAG laser device for lipolysis and skin tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):779-4. CrossRef
  35. Woodhall KE, Saluja R, Khoury J, Goldman MP. A comparison of three separate clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted lipolysis using 1,064, 1,320?nm, and a combined 1,064/1,320?nm multiplex device. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):774-. CrossRef
  36. Mordon S, Eymard-Maurin AF, Wassmer B, Ringot J. Histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis: pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser versus cw 980-nm diode laser. Aesthet Surg J. 2007;27(3):263-. CrossRef
  37. Reynaud JP, Skibinski M, Wassmer B, Rochon P, Mordon S. Lipolysis using a 980-nm diode laser: a retrospective analysis of 534 procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33(1):28-6. CrossRef
  38. Trelles MA, Mordon SR, Bonanad E, Moreno Moraga J, Heckmann A, Unglaub F, et al. Laser-assisted lipolysis in the treatment of gynecomastia: a prospective study in 28 patients. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(2):375-2. CrossRef
  39. Leclère FM, Trelles M, Moreno-Moraga J, Servell P, Unglaub F, Mordon SR. 980-nm laser lipolysis (LAL): about 674 procedures in 359 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012;14(2):67-3. / A report on 674 laser lipolysis procedures with a 980-nm diode laser. Fat reduction was observed on ultrasound at 3?months with the greatest reduction in the abdomen and buttocks. CrossRef
  40. Tark KC, Jung JE, Song SY. Superior lipolytic effect of the 1,444?nm Nd:YAG laser: comparison with the 1,064?nm Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):721-. CrossRef
  41. Kim JH, Min KH, Heo CY, Baek RM, Park HJ, Youn SW, et al. Histological evaluation of dermal tissue remodeling with the 1444-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in in vivo model. J Dermatol. 2013;40(9):706-0. / Histologic examination of guinea pig tissue treated with a novel 1444-nm Nd:YAG laser showed increased dermal thickness, collagen organization, fibroblast proliferation, intensity of elastic fibers, and mucopolysaccharides. CrossRef
  42. Holcomb JD, Turk J, Baek SJ, Rousso DE. Laser-assisted facial contouring using a thermally confined 1444-nm Nd-YAG laser: a new paradigm for facial sculpting and rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27(4):315-0. CrossRef
  43. Weiss RA, Beasley K. Laser-assisted liposuction using a novel blend of lipid- and water-selective wavelengths. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(10):760-. CrossRef
  44. Leclère FM, Moreno-Moraga J, Mordon S, Servell P, Unglaub F, Kolb F, et al. Laser-assisted lipolysis for cankle remodeling: a prospective study in 30 patients. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):131-. CrossRef
  45. Moreno-Moraga J, Trelles MA, Mordon S, Unglaub F, Bravo E, Royo de La Torre J, et al. Laser-assisted lipolysis for knee remodeling: a prospective study in 30 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012;14(2):59-6. CrossRef
  46. Licata G, Agostini T, Fanelli G, Grassetti L, Marcianò A, Rovatti PP, et al. Lipolysis using a new 1540-nm diode laser: a retrospective analysis of 230 consecutive procedures. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013;15(4):184-2. / A study of 230 patients treated with a novel 1,540-nm diode laser. Subjective reporting of fat reduction and skin tightening as well patient satisfaction. CrossRef
  47. Chia CT, Theodorou SJ. 1,000 consecutive cases of laser-assisted liposuction and suction-assisted lipectomy managed with local anesthesia. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):795-02. / Largest report to date of safety data for laser-assisted lipolysis (1,064- and/or 1,320-nm Nd:YAG). Of 1,000 cases, three burns, two infections, one hematoma, and one seroma were noted. CrossRef
  48. Katz B, McBean J. Laser-assisted lipolysis: a report on complications. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10(4):231-. CrossRef
  49. Mordon S, Plot E. Laser lipolysis versus traditional liposuction for fat removal. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(6):677-8. CrossRef
  50. Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S, Leniz P, Castillo P, Gaete F. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing laser-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4):1032-5. CrossRef
  51. DiBernardo BE. Randomized, blinded split abdomen study evaluating skin shrinkage and skin tightening in laser-assisted liposuction versus liposuction control. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(4):593-02. CrossRef
  52. Goldman A, Wollina U, de Mundstock EC. Evaluation of tissue tightening by the subdermal Nd:YAG laser-assisted liposuction versus liposuction alone. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4(2):122-. CrossRef
  53. Lillis PJ. Liposuction surgery under local anesthesia. Limited blood loss and minimal lidocaine absorption. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;14:1145-. CrossRef
  54. Przylipiak AF, Galicka E, Donejko M, Niczyporuk M, Przylipiak J. A comparative study of internal laser-assisted and conventional liposuction: a look at the influence of drugs and major surgery on laboratory postoperative values. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2013;7:1195-00. / Pre- and post-treatment, 1,064-nm Nd:YAG laser lipolysis and tumescent liposuction laboratory results were compared. No difference in platelet, neutrophil, or lymphocyte counts between the two methods. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Christie G. Regula (1)
  Naomi Lawrence (1)
  
  1. Division of Dermatology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 10000 Sagemore Drive, Suite 10103, Marlton, NJ, 08043, USA
  
• ISSN：2162-4933

文摘

Tumescent liposuction has become an increasingly popular cosmetic procedure since its inception nearly 30?years ago. Laser lipolysis has more recently been studied as an alternative method of body contouring. We discuss the efficacy and safety of laser lipolysis in comparison to tumescent liposuction. Ultimately, while laser lipolysis is effective for localized fat reduction, data is lacking to show its superiority to tumescent liposuction.