Information Needs Assessment for Coastal and Marine Management and Policy: Ecosystem Services Under Changing Climatic, Land Use, and Demographic Conditions

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kaitlin A. Goldsmith ; Elise F. Granek ; Amy Lubitow
• 关键词：Coastal ecosystems ; Coastal management ; Evidence ; based decisions ; Communication ; Ecosystem services ; Data needs
• 刊名：Environmental Management
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：56
• 期：6
• 页码：1502-1513
• 全文大小：703 KB
• 参考文献：Batker D, Swedeen P, Costanza R, de la Torre I, Boumans R, Bagstad K (2010) A new view of the Puget sound economy: the economic value of nature鈥檚 services in the Puget sound basin. Earth Economics, Tacoma
  Berkes F, Folke C (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York
  Cantrill J, Senecah S (2001) Using the 鈥榮ense of self-in-place鈥?construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environ Sci Policy 4:185鈥?03CrossRef
  Carr E, Worth A (2001) The use of the telephone interview for research. Nurs Times Res 6(511):511鈥?24. doi:10.鈥?177/鈥?361409601006001鈥?7 CrossRef
  Chan K, Shaw M, Cameron D, Underwood E, Daily G (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4(11):2138鈥?152
  Cheng A, Daniels S (2003) Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: a case study of place-based collaborative planning. Forest Sci 49(6):841鈥?54
  Choi BCK, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P, Sherman G, Goddard M, Ackland M, Salinsbury P, Stachenko S, Morrison H, Clottey C (2005) Can scientists and policymakers work together? J Epidemiol Commun Health 59:632鈥?37CrossRef
  Daily G, Matson P (2008) Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9455鈥?456CrossRef
  Davis E, Moseley C, Olsen C, Abrams J, Creighton J (2013) Diversity and dynamism of fire science and user needs. J Forest 111(2):101鈥?07CrossRef
  Dobbins M, Rosenbaum P, Plews N, Law M, Fysh A (2007) Information transfer: what do decision makers want and need from researchers? Implement Sci 2(20):1鈥?2
  Drake J, Kontar Y, Rife G (eds) (2014) New trends in earth-science outreach and engagement: the nature of communication., Advances in natural and technological hazards researchSpringer, New York
  Francis T, Whittaker K, Shandas V, Mills AV, Graybill JK (2005) Incorporating science into the environmental policy process: a case study from Washington State. Ecol Soc 10(1):35
  Gareau B (2007) Ecological values amid local interests: natural resource conservation, social differentiation, and human survival in Honduras. Rural Sociol 72(2):244鈥?68CrossRef
  Granek E, Polasky S, Kappel C, Reed D, Stoms D, Koch E, Kennedy C, Wolanski E (2010) Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conserv Biol 24(1):207鈥?16CrossRef
  Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2011) Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): 2011 update. Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
  Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Daily G, Polasky S (2011) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Prog Phys Geogr 35(5):701鈥?04CrossRef
  Karrer L, Beldia II P, Dennison B, Dominici A, Dutra G, English C, Gunawan T, Hastings J, Katz L, Kelty R, McField M, Nunez E, Obura D, Ortiz F, Quesada M, Sivo L, Stone G (2011) Science-to-action guidebook. Science and Knowledge Division, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia. www.鈥媠cience2action.鈥媜rg . Accessed 9 Nov 2014
  Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connections in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8(2005):452鈥?63CrossRef
  Lach D, Parker A, Boesl M (2012) Assessing regional climate needs. Pacific Northwest Climate Decision Support Consortium
  Martinez R, Rusch E (2012) Understanding the connections between coastal waters and ocean ecosystem services and human health: Basic services, valuation, and resiliency (workshop). Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine, Washington
  Matso K, Becker M (2014) What can funders do to better link science with decisions? Case studies of coastal communities and climate change. Environ Manag. doi:10.鈥?007/鈥媠00267-014-0347-2
  McGregor M (2006) What decision-makers want and what they have been getting. Value Health 9(3):181鈥?85CrossRef
  McLeod K, Leslie H (eds) (2009) Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Island Press, Washington
  Metz D (2013) The language of conservation 2013: updated recommendations on how to communicate effectively to build support for conservation. Public Opinion Strategies, Fairbanks, Maslin, Maullin, Metz and Associates, Los Angeles
  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington
  National Ocean Council (U.S.) (2014) National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媤hitehouse.鈥媑ov/鈥?鈥媠ites/鈥媎efault/鈥媐iles/鈥媙ational_鈥媜cean_鈥媝olicy_鈥媔mplementation_鈥媝lan.鈥媝df . Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  National Research Council (2012) Using science as evidence in public policy. Committee on the use of social science knowledge in public policy. In: Prewitt K, Schwandt TA, Straf ML (eds) Division of behavioral and social sciences and Education, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
  National Research Council (U.S.) (2013) An ecosystem services approach to assessing the impacts of the deepwater horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The National Academies Press, Washington
  National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology (2013) Science for an ocean nation: Update of the ocean research priorities plan. Washington, DC 2502. https://鈥媤ww.鈥媤hitehouse.鈥媑ov/鈥媠ites/鈥媎efault/鈥媐iles/鈥媘icrosites/鈥媜stp/鈥媜cean_鈥媟esearch_鈥媝lan_鈥?013.鈥媝df . Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  Novick G (2008) Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health 31:391鈥?98CrossRef
  Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (1990) Principle Policies of the Oregon ORMP. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媜regon.鈥媑ov/鈥婰CD/鈥婳CMP/鈥婸ages/鈥婳cean_鈥婸olicies.鈥媋spx . Accessed 8 Jan 2014
  Pacific Coast Collaborative (2013) Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate and Energy. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媝acificcoastcoll鈥媋borative.鈥媜rg/鈥婦ocuments/鈥婸acific%20鈥婥oast%20鈥婥limate%20鈥婣ction%20鈥婸lan.鈥媝df . Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  Panetta L, Adams J, Claussen E, Guerrero C, Hayden M, Heal G, Kennel CF, Knowles T, Lubchenco J, Packard J, Parravano P, Pataki G, Riley J Jr., Rockerfeller D Jr., Rufe R Jr., Sullivan K, Ware M, White P (2003) America鈥檚 living oceans: charting a course for sea change (A Report to the Nation). PEW Oceans Commission
  Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Qual Soc Work 1(3):261鈥?83. doi:10.鈥?177/鈥?473325002001003鈥?36 CrossRef
  Rees S, Austen M, Attrill M, Rodwell L (2013) Incorporating indirect ecosystem services into marine protected area planning and management. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8(3):273鈥?85. doi:10.鈥?080/鈥?1513732.鈥?012.鈥?80500 CrossRef
  Regional Data Framework Action Coordination Team (2013) West Coast Governor鈥檚 Alliance on Ocean Health Regional Data Framework Action Coordination Team Work Plan. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媤estcoastoceans.鈥媜rg/鈥媘edia/鈥媎ata_鈥媙etwork_鈥媋ct/鈥媟df_鈥媤ork_鈥媝lan_鈥媐inal_鈥?-12-13.鈥媝df . Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  Rowe A, Lee K (2012) Linking knowledge with action: and approach to philanthropic funding of science for conservation. A report to the conservation and science program. David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Altos
  Stokstad E (2005) Taking the pulse of earth鈥檚 life-support systems. Science 308(5718):41鈥?3CrossRef
  Tallis H, Polasky S (2009) Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162(01):265鈥?83CrossRef
  Thomas D (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(237):237鈥?46. doi:10.鈥?177/鈥?098214005283748鈥?/span> CrossRef
  Wainger LA, King DM, Mack RN, Price EW, Maslin T (2010) Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions? Ecol Econ 69(5):978鈥?87. doi:10.鈥?016/鈥媕.鈥媏colecon.鈥?009.鈥?2.鈥?11 CrossRef
  West Coast Governors Alliance on Ocean Health (2013) WCGA Restructure Document. http://鈥媤ww.鈥媤estcoastoceans.鈥媜rg/鈥媘edia/鈥媋ugust2012excomm鈥媘eeting/鈥媤cgalliance_鈥媟estructure_鈥媐inal.鈥媝df . Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  White C, Halpem S, Kappel C (2012) Ecosystem services tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. PNAS 109(12):4696鈥?701CrossRef
  Wolf A (2004) Research strategies for policy relevance. Soc Policy J N Z 23:65鈥?5
  Worm B, Barbier E, Beaumont N, Duffy J, Folke C, Halpern B, Jackson J, Lotze H, Micheli F, Palumbi S, Sala E, Selkoe K, Stachowicz J, Watson R (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787鈥?90CrossRef
  Zheng W, Shi H, Chen S, Zhu M (2009) Benefit and cost analysis of mariculture based on ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68(6):1626鈥?632CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Kaitlin A. Goldsmith (1)
  Elise F. Granek (1)
  Amy Lubitow (2)
  
  1. Environmental Science & Management, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR, 97207, USA
  2. Sociology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR, 97207, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Environment
  Environmental Management
  Ecology
  Nature Conservation
  Atmospheric Protection, Air Quality Control and Air Pollution
  Forestry Management
  Waste Water Technology, Water Pollution Control, Water Management and Aquatic Pollution
  
• 出版者：Springer New York
• ISSN：1432-1009

文摘

Changing climatic, demographic, and land use conditions are projected to alter the provisioning of ecosystem services in estuarine, coastal, and nearshore marine ecosystems, necessitating mitigation and adaptation policies and management. The current paradigm of research efforts occurring in parallel to, rather than in collaboration with, decision makers will be insufficient for the rapid responses required to adapt to and mitigate for projected changing conditions. Here, we suggest a different paradigm: one where research begins by engaging decision makers in the identification of priority data needs (biophysical, economic, and social). This paper uses synthesized interview data to provide insight into the varied demands for scientific research as described by decision makers working on coastal issues in Oregon, USA. The findings highlight the need to recognize (1) the differing framing of ecosystem services by decision makers versus scientists; and (2) the differing data priorities relevant to inland versus coastal decision makers. The findings further serve to highlight the need for decision makers, scientists, and funders to engage in increased communication. This research is an important first step in advancing efforts toward evidence-based decision making in Oregon and provides a template for further research across the US. Keywords Coastal ecosystems Coastal management Evidence-based decisions Communication Ecosystem services Data needs