Sigma virus and male reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Clare C. Rittschof (1) (2)
Swetapadma Pattanaik (1)
Laura Johnson (1)
Luis F. Matos (3) (4)
Jérémie Brusini (1)
Marta L. Wayne (1) - 关键词：Seminal peptide ; Co ; evolution ; Mate choice ; Polyandry ; Maternal effect
- 刊名：Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：April 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：67
- 期：4
- 页码：529-540
- 全文大小：318KB
- 参考文献：1. Able DJ (1996) The contagion indicator hypothesis for parasite-mediated sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(5):2229-233. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1073/pnas.93.5.2229 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.5.2229">CrossRef
2. Alatalo RV, Burke T, Dann J, Hanotte O, Hoglund J, Lundberg A, Moss R, Rintamaki PT (1996) Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour 52:861-73. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1006/anbe.1996.0234 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0234">CrossRef
3. Alcock J (1994) Post-insemination associations between males and females in insects -the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:1-1 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000245">CrossRef
4. Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
5. Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Wiklund C (2004) Sexual conflict and anti-aphrodisiac titre in a polyandrous butterfly: male ejaculate tailoring and absence of female control. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 271(1550):1765-770. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1098/rspb.2003.2671 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2671">CrossRef
6. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145-64 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1446">CrossRef
7. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2002) Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415(6873):787-89 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415787a">CrossRef
8. Ball MA, Parker GA (2003) Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females. J Theor Biol 224(1):27-2. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00118-8 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00118-8">CrossRef
9. Barker DM (1994) Copulatory plugs and paternity assurance in the nematode / Caenorhabditis elegans. Animal Behaviour 48(1):147-56. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1006/anbe.1994.1221 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1221">CrossRef
10. Barta ZN, Houston AI, McNamara JM, Szekely T (2002) Sexual conflict about parental care: the role of reserves. Am Nat 159(6):687-05. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1086/339995 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339995">CrossRef
11. Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24(3):546-59 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2406835">CrossRef
12. Birkhead TR, Moller AP, Sutherland WJ (1993) Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs. J Theor Biol 161(1):51-0. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1006/jtbi.1993.1039 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1039">CrossRef
13. Boorman E, Parker GA (1976) Sperm (ejaculate) competition in / Drosophila melanogaster, and reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol Entomol 1(3):145-55. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1111/j.1365-2311.1976.tb01217.x lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1976.tb01217.x">CrossRef
14. Borgia G, Collis K (1989) Female choice for parasite-free male satin bowerbirds and the evolution of bright male plumage. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25(6):445-53. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1007/bf00300191 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00300191">CrossRef
15. Bretman A, Fricke C, Hetherington P, Stone R, Chapman T (2010) Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in / Drosophila melanogaster. Behavioral Ecology 21(2):317-21. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1093/beheco/arp189 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp189">CrossRef
16. Brownlie JC, Cass BN, Riegler M, Witsenburg JJ, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, McGraw EA, O'Neill SL (2009) Evidence for metabolic provisioning by a common invertebrate endosymbiont, / Wolbachia pipientis, during periods of nutritional stress. PLoS pathogens 5(4):e1000368 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000368">CrossRef
17. Brun G, Plus N (1980) The viruses of / Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of / Drosophila, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 626-72
18. Burley NT, Foster VS (2006) Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity. Animal Behaviour 72:713-19. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.017 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.017">CrossRef
19. Chapman T (2001) Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in / Drosophila. Heredity 87:511-21 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00961.x">CrossRef
20. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L (1995) Cost of mating in / Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373(6511):241-44 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/373241a0">CrossRef
21. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18(1):41-7 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6">CrossRef
22. Clark AG, Begun DJ (1998) Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in / Drosophila. Genetics 149(3):1487-493
23. Clark MA, McCrady WB, Fieldling CL (1979) Independent production of COlass="a-plus-plus">2 sensitivity by nuclear gene-Dly and a transmissible agent from delayed-recovery / Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 92:503-10
24. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T (1999) Female × male interactions in / Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283(5399):217-20. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1126/science.283.5399.217 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5399.217">CrossRef
25. de Crespigny FEC, Wedell N (2006) / Wolbachia infection reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 273(1593):1455-458. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1098/rspb.2006.3478 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3478">CrossRef
26. de Crespigny FEC, Hurst LD, Wedell N (2008) Do / Wolbachia-associated incompatibilities promote polyandry? Evolution 62(1):107-22. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00274.x lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00274.x">CrossRef
27. Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119(5):601-10 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283938">CrossRef
28. Drapeau MD, Cyran SA, Viering MM, Geyer PK, Long AD (2006) A / cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of / Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success. Genetics 172(2):1009-030. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1534/genetics.105.045666 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.045666">CrossRef
29. Fenton A, Johnson KN, Brownlie JC, Hurst GDD (2011) Solving the / Wolbachia paradox: modeling the tripartite interaction between host, / Wolbachia, and a natural enemy. Am Nat 178(3):333-42. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1086/661247 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661247">CrossRef
30. Fleuriet A (1981) Comparison of various physiological traits in flies ( / Drosophila melanogaster) of wild origin, infected or uninfected by the hereditary rhabdovirus sigma. Archives of Virology 69(3-):261-72. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1007/bf01317341 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01317341">CrossRef
31. Fleuriet A (1988) Maintenance of a hereditary virus, the sigma virus in populations of its host, / Drosophila melanogaster. Evolutionary Biology 23:1-0 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1043-3_1">CrossRef
32. Fleuriet A (1996) Polymorphism of the / Drosophila melanogaster -Sigma virus system. J Evol Biol 9:471-84 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9040471.x">CrossRef
33. Garolla A, Pizzol D, Foresta C (2011) The role of human papillomavirus on sperm function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23(4):232-37. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a3a4 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a3a4">CrossRef
34. Gilchrist AS, Partridge L (2000) Why it is difficult to model sperm displacement in / Drosophila melanogaster: the relation between sperm transfer and copulation duration. Evolution 54(2):534-42. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0534:wiidtm]2.0.co;2
35. Grafe TU, Bitz JH (2004) Functions of duetting in the tropical boubou, / Laniarius aethiopicus: territorial defence and mutual mate guarding. Animal Behaviour 68:193-01. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.003 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.003">CrossRef
36. Heifetz Y, Tram U, Wolfner MF (2001) Male contributions to egg production: the role of accessory gland products and sperm in / Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 268(1463):175-80 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1347">CrossRef
37. Herndon LA, Wolfner MF (1995) A / Drosophila seminal fluid protein, ACP26AA, stimulates egg-laying in females for 1?day after mating. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(22):10114-0118. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1073/pnas.92.22.10114 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.22.10114">CrossRef
38. Higgins LA, Jones KM, Wayne ML (2005) Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in / Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity. Evolution 59(7):1529-539. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1554/04-762
39. Hosokawa T, Koga R, Kikuchi Y, Meng X-Y, Fukatsu T (2010) / Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(2):769-74. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1073/pnas.0911476107 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911476107">CrossRef
40. Knell RJ, Webberley KM (2004) Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biological Reviews 79(3):557-81 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006365">CrossRef
41. L'Héritier P, Teissier G (1945) Transmission héréditaire de la sensibilité au gaz carbonique chez la Drosophile. Publ lab ENS Biologie 1:35-6
42. Luong LT, Kaya HK (2005) Sexually transmitted nematodes affect spermatophylax production in the cricket, / Gryllodes sigillatus. Behav Ecol 16(1):153-58. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1093/beheco/arh146 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh146">CrossRef
43. Lupold S, Manier MK, Ala-Honkola O, Belote JM, Pitnick S (2011) Male / Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age. Behavioral Ecology 22(1):184-91. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1093/beheco/arq193 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq193">CrossRef
44. Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, Novikov D, Stuart WT, Pitnick S (2010) Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in / Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328(5976):354-57. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1126/science.1187096 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1187096">CrossRef
45. Mueller JL, Linklater JR, Ravi Ram K, Chapman T, Wolfner MF (2008) Targeted gene deletion and phenotypic analysis of the / Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid protease inhibitor Acp62F. Genetics 178:1605-614 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.083766">CrossRef
46. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45:525-67 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x">CrossRef
47. Perampaladas K, Stoltz JA, Andrade MCB (2008) Mated redback spider females re-advertise receptivity months after mating. Ethology 114(6):589-98. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01513.x lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01513.x">CrossRef
48. Pizzari T, Dean R, Pacey A, Moore H, Bonsall MB (2008) The evolutionary ecology of pre- and post-meiotic sperm senescence. Trends Ecol Evol 23(3):131-40. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.003 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.003">CrossRef
49. Radhakrishnan P, Perez-Staples D, Weldon CW, Taylor PW (2009) Multiple mating and sperm depletion in male Queensland fruit flies: effects on female remating behaviour. Animal Behaviour 78(4):839-46. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.002 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.002">CrossRef
50. Reinhardt K, Naylor R, Siva-Jothy MT (2011) Male mating rate is constrained by seminal fluid availability in bedbugs, / Cimex lectularius. PLoS ONE 6(7):doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">e2208210.1371/journal.pone.0022082 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022082">CrossRef
51. Rowe L, Arnqvist G, Sih A, Krupa J (1994) Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns -water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol Evol 9(8):289-93. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9">CrossRef
52. Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:125-46. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501">CrossRef
53. Soller M, Bownes M, Kubli E (1999) Control of oocyte maturation in sexually mature / Drosophila females. Developmental Biology 208(2):337-51. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1006/dbio.1999.9210 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9210">CrossRef
54. Thrall PH, Antonovics J, Dobson AP (2000) Sexually transmitted diseases in polygynous mating systems: prevalence and impact on reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 267(1452):1555-563 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1178">CrossRef
55. Wayne ML, Blohm GM, Brooks ME, Regan KL, Brown BY, Barfield M, Holt RD, Bolker BM (2011) The prevalence and persistence of sigma virus, a biparentally transmitted parasite of / Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Ecol Res 13:323-45
56. Wigby S, Sirot LK, Linklater JR, Buehner N, Calboli FCF, Bretman A, Wolfner MF, Chapman T (2009) Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success. Current Biology 19(9):751-57. doi:lass="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.036 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.036">CrossRef
57. Yampolsky LY, Webb CT, Shabalina SA, Kondrashov AS (1999) Rapid accumulation of a vertically transmitted parasite triggered by relaxation of natural selection among hosts. Evol Ecol Res 1:581-89
58. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility (Invited article). Ethology 109(12):929-50 lass="external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00945.x">CrossRef - 作者单位：Clare C. Rittschof (1) (2)
Swetapadma Pattanaik (1)
Laura Johnson (1)
Luis F. Matos (3) (4)
Jérémie Brusini (1)
Marta L. Wayne (1)
1. Department of Biology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8525, USA
2. Department of Entomology and Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
3. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110620, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0620, USA
4. Department of Biology, Eastern Washington University, 258 Science Building, Cheney, WA, 99004, USA - ISSN：1432-0762
文摘
The risk of disease transmission can affect female mating rate, and thus sexual conflict. Furthermore, the interests of a sexually transmitted organism may align or diverge with those of either sex, potentially making the disease agent a third participant in the sexual arms race. In Drosophila melanogaster, where sexual conflict over female mating rate is well established, we investigated how a common, non-lethal virus (sigma virus) might affect this conflict. We gave uninfected females the opportunity to copulate twice in no-choice trials: either with two uninfected males, or with one male infected with sigma virus followed by an uninfected male. We assessed whether females respond behaviorally to male infection, determined whether male infection affects either female or male reproductive success, and measured offspring infection rates. Male infection status did not influence time to copulation, or time to re-mating. However, male infection did affect male reproductive success: first males sired a significantly greater proportion of offspring, as well as more total offspring, when they were infected with sigma virus. Thus viral infection may provide males an advantage in sperm competition, or, possibly, females may preferentially use infected sperm. We found no clear costs of infection in terms of offspring survival. Viral reproductive success (the number of infected offspring) was strongly correlated with male reproductive success. Further studies are needed to demonstrate whether virus-induced changes in reproductive success affect male and female lifetime fitness, and whether virus-induced changes are under male, female, or viral control.