CIS-based registration of quality of life in a single source approach

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fleur Fritz (1)
  Sonja St?nder (2)
  Bernhard Breil (1)
  Markus Riek (1)
  Martin Dugas (1)
  
• 关键词：Quality of Life ; Pruritus ; Single Source ; Clinical Information System ; Medical Documentation ; Mobile Device ; Web ; based Application ; Patient Questionnaire ; Data Import
• 刊名：BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：December 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：11
• 期：1
• 全文大小：602KB
• 参考文献：1. Feeny D, Labelle r, Torrance G: Integrating Economic Evaluations and Quality of Life Assessments. In / Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. Edited by: B. Spilker. Raven Press, Ltd. New York; 1990:71-3.
  2. Solari A: Role of health-related quality of life measures in the routine care of people with multiple sclerosis. / Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3:16. CrossRef
  3. Miguel RS, López-González AM, Sanchez-Iriso E, Mar J, Cabasés JM: Measuring health-related quality of life in drug clinical trials: is it given due importance? / Pharm World Sci 2008,30(2):154-0. CrossRef
  4. Vickrey BG: Getting oriented to patient-oriented outcomes. / Neurology 1999,11(4):662-. 53
  5. Legrand C, Efficace F: Implementing PR HRQOL data in cancer routine practice to improve accuracy of prognosis. Are we there yet? / Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2009,9(6):493-. CrossRef
  6. Rothman ML, Beltran P, Pharm D, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb J, Teschendorf B: Patient-Reported Outcomes: Conceptual Issues. / Value in Health 2007,10(2):66-5. CrossRef
  7. Doward LC, Gnanasakthy A, Baker MG: Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim. / Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010, 8:89. CrossRef
  8. Basch E: The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. / N Engl J Med 2010,362(10):865-. CrossRef
  9. Testa MA, Simonson DC: Current Concepts: Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes. / N Engl J Med 1996,334(13):835-0. CrossRef
  10. World Health Organization: Constitution of the World Health Organization. In / Basic Documents. Geneva: WHO; 1948:1-.
  11. Smith K, Avis N, Assmann S: Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: A meta-analysis. / Quality of Life Research 1999, 8:447-59. CrossRef
  12. Wilson IB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with Health-Related Quality of Life. A Conceptual Model of Patient Outcomes. / JAMA 1995,273(1):59-5. CrossRef
  13. David SE, Ahmed Z, Salek MS, Finlay AY: Does enough quality of life-related discussion occur during dermatology outpatient consultations? / Br J Dermatol 2005, 153:997-000. CrossRef
  14. Salek S, Roberts A, Finlay AY: The practical reality of using a patient-reported outcome measure in a routine dermatology clinic. / Dermatology 2007,215(4):315-. CrossRef
  15. Ammenwerth E, Sp?tl HP: The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care. A work-sampling analysis of physicians' activities. / Methods Inf Med 2009,48(1):84-1.
  16. Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Landthaler M, Stolz W: Treatment of atopic dermatitis and impact on quality of life: a review with emphasis on topical non-corticosteroids. / Pharmacoeconomics 2003,21(3):159-9. CrossRef
  17. Dugas M, Breil B, Thiemann V, Lechtenb?rger J, Vossen G: Single source information systems to connect patient care and clinical research. / Stud Health Technol Inform 2009, 150:61-.
  18. Nahm ML, Pieper CF, Cunningham MM: Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture. / PLoS One 2008,3(8):e3049. CrossRef
  19. Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T: Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. / Methods Inf Med 2009,48(1):38-4.
  20. Ohmann C, Future Kuchinke W: Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research. / Methods Inf Med 2009,48(1):45-4.
  21. Kimball AB, Jacobson C, Weiss S, Vreeland MG, Wu Y: The Psychosocial Burden of Psoriasis. / American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2005,6(6):383-92. (10) CrossRef
  22. Pogatzki-Zahn E, Marziniak M, Schneider G, Luger TA, St?nder S: Chronic Pruritus: Targets, Mechanisms and Future Therapies. / Drug News Perspect 2008, 21:541-1.
  23. Finlay AY, Khan GK: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): A simple practical measure for routine clinical use. / Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 1994, 19:210-16. CrossRef
  24. Basra MK, Fenech R, Gatt RM, Salek MS, Finlay AY: The Dermatology Life Quality Index 1994-007: a comprehensive review of validation data and clinical results. / British Journal of Dermatology 2008,159(5):997-035.
  25. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An Inventory for Measuring Depression. / Archives of General Psychiatry 1961, 4:53-3.
  26. Hamilton M: A rating scale for depression. / J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960, 23:56-2. CrossRef
  27. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA: A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. / Br J Psychiatry 1978, 133:429-5. CrossRef
  28. Herrmann C, Buss U, Snaith RP: / HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Deutsche Version. Bern: Hans Huber; 1995.
  29. Ammenwerth E, Haux R: / IT-Projektmanagement in Krankenhaus und Gesundheitswesen. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart; 2005:114-79.
  30. Microsoft Visio [http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/]
  31. Agfa Healthcare GmbH [http://www.agfa.com/en/he/home.jsp]
  32. Herzberg S: HIS-based support of follow-up documentation - concept and implementation for clinical studies. / Applied Clinical Informatics 2011,2(1):1-7. CrossRef
  33. W3C [http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema]
  34. Riek M: Design und Implementierung webbasierter Patientenfrageb?gen. In / Bachelorthesis. Institute of Medical Informatics, University Münster; 2010.
  35. IBM SPSS Statistics [http://www.spss.com/software/statistics/]
  36. Apple Inc [http://www.apple.com]
  37. Fritz F, Zavorotnyy M, Breil B, Domschke K, Zwanzger P, Dugas M: Von KIS zu SPSS - Datentransformation gem?? eines Single Source Ansatzes. / Accepted as oral presentation at GMDS Jahrestagung 2010.
  38. Staggers N, Thompson CB, Snyder-Halpern R: History and trends in clinical information systems in the United States. / J Nurs Scholarsh 2001,33(1):75-1. CrossRef
  39. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/11/26/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Fleur Fritz (1)
  Sonja St?nder (2)
  Bernhard Breil (1)
  Markus Riek (1)
  Martin Dugas (1)
  
  1. Institute of Medical Informatics, University Münster, Domagkstra?e 9, 48149, Münster, Germany
  2. Department of Dermatology, Competence Center for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Chronic Pruritus, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
  

文摘

Background Documenting quality of life (QoL) in routine medical care and using it both for treatment and for clinical research is not common, although such information is absolutely valuable for physicians and patients alike. We therefore aimed at developing an efficient method to integrate quality of life information into the clinical information system (CIS) and thus make it available for clinical care and secondary use. Methods We piloted our method in three different medical departments, using five different QoL questionnaires. In this setting we used structured interviews and onsite observations to perform workflow and form analyses. The forms and pertinent data reports were implemented using the integrated tools of the local CIS. A web-based application for mobile devices was developed based on XML schemata to facilitate data import into the CIS. Data exports of the CIS were analysed with statistical software to perform an analysis of data quality. Results The quality of life questionnaires are now regularly documented by patients and physicians. The resulting data is available in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and can be used for treatment purposes and communication as well as research functionalities. The completion of questionnaires by the patients themselves using a mobile device (iPad) and the import of the respective data into the CIS forms were successfully tested in a pilot installation. The quality of data is rendered high by the use of automatic score calculations as well as the automatic creation of forms for follow-up documentation. The QoL data was exported to research databases for use in scientific analysis. Conclusion The CIS-based QoL is technically feasible, clinically accepted and provides an excellent quality of data for medical treatment and clinical research. Our approach with a commercial CIS and the web-based application is transferable to other sites.