Direct air capture of CO2 and climate stabilization: A model based assessment
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Chen Chen (1) (2)
Massimo Tavoni (1) (2) - 刊名：Climatic Change
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：May 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：118
- 期：1
- 页码：59-72
- 全文大小：320KB
- 参考文献：1. American Physical Society (2011) Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs
2. Azar C, Lindgren K, Obersteiner M, Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, M?llersten K, Larson ED (2010) The Feasibility of Low CO2 Concentration Targets and the Role of Bio-energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). Clim Chang 100(1):195-02 CrossRef
3. Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf Econ Pap 46:878-94
4. Bickel JE, Lane L (2010) Climate engineering. In: Lomborg B (ed) Smart solutions for climate change: Comparing costs and benefits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E and Tavoni M (2006) WITCH: A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model. The Energy Journal, Special Issue. Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down, 13-8.
6. Bosetti V, Carraro C, Massetti E (2008) Banking permits: economic efficiency and distributional effects. J Policy Model 31(3):382-03 CrossRef
7. Bosetti V, Carraro C, De Cian E, Duval R, Massetti E and Tavoni M (2009a) The Incentives to Participate in and the Stability of International Climate Coalitions: A Game-Theoretic Approach Using the WITCH Model. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 702, June 2009
8. Bosetti V, Tavoni M, De Cian E and Sgobbi A (2009b) The 2008 WITCH Model: New Model Features and Baseline. FEEM Working Paper 2009.085
9. Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J Public Econ 52:309-28 CrossRef
10. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 international scenarios. Energy Econ 31(2):S64–S81
11. Gruber N, Gloor M, Mikaloff-Fletcher SE, Doney SC, Dutkiewicz S, Follows M, Gerber M, Jacobson AR, Joos F, Lindsay K, Menemenlis D, Moucheta A, Muller SA, Sarmiento JL, Takahashi T (2009) Oceanic sources, sinks and transport of atmospheric CO2. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23:GB1005. doi:10.1029/2008GB003349 CrossRef
12. Hendriks C, Graus W and Bergen FV (2004) Global Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential Costs, Report EEP 02001, Ecofys, Utrecht, The Netherlands
13. House KZ, Baclig AC, Ranjan M, van Nierop EA, Wilcox J and Herzog HJ (2011) Economic and Energetic Analysis of Capturing CO2 from Ambient Air, Proc Natl Acad,108(51)
14. International Energy Agency (2008) CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option
15. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) Climate Change 2007: Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA
16. IPCC Special Reports (2005) Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Keith WD, Ha-Duong M, Stolaroff KJ (2005) Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air. Clim Chang 74:17-5 CrossRef
18. Lackner SK, Brennan S, Matter JM, Park AHA, Wright A, Van der Zwaan B (2012) The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(33):13156-3162 CrossRef
19. Mazzotti M, Bociocchi R, Desmond MJ, Socolow R (This Special Issue) Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals: optimization of a two-loop hydroxide carbonate system using a countercurrent airliquid contactor. Climatic Change
20. Nemet FG and Brandt RA (2012) Willingness to Pay for a Climate Backstop: Liquid Fuel Producers and Direct CO2 Air Capture. Energy J Int Assoc Energy Econ
21. Pielke AR (2009) An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy. Environ Sci Policy 12:216-25 CrossRef
22. Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty http://royalsociety.org/geoengineeringclimate/
23. Solomon S et al. (2010) Stabilization Targets for Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Concentrations, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
24. Tavoni M, Socolow R, Chakravarty S (2012) Safe vs. Fair: a formidable trade-off in tackling climate change. Sustainability 4:210-26 CrossRef
25. Van Vuuren D, Riahi K (2010) The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets. Clim Chang 104(3-):793-01
26. Vichi Navarra and Fogli (This Special Issue) Adjustment of the Nabural Carbon Cycle to Negative Emission Rates. Climatic Change
27. Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324(5931):1183-186 CrossRef - 作者单位：Chen Chen (1) (2)
Massimo Tavoni (1) (2)
1. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Corso Magenta, 63, 20123, Milan, MI, Italy
2. Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, Corso Magenta 63, Milan, MI, Italy - ISSN：1573-1480
文摘
This paper provides a novel assessment of the role of direct air capture of CO2 from ambient air (DAC) on the feasibility of achieving stringent climate stabilization. We use the WITCH energy-economy-climate model to investigate the long term prospects of DAC, implementing a technological specification based on recent estimates by the American Physical Society (APS 2011). Assuming global cooperation on a stringent climate policy we find that: (1) DAC is deployed only late in century, after other low carbon options, though at a very significant scale; (2) DAC has an impact on the marginal and total abatement costs (reducing them) and on the timing of mitigation (postponing it); (3) DAC also allows for a prolonged use of oil, with a positive welfare impact for energy exporting countries. Finally, we assess the role of DAC in a less than ideal climate policy by exploring its potential for engaging energy exporting countries in climate mitigation activities by means of a “clean oil-market in which oil exporters can sell oil decarbonized via DAC.