Damage reduction and performance of mass trapping devices for forest protection against the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (Coleoptera Curculionidae Scolytinae)
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Massimo Faccoli (1)
Fabio Stergulc (2) - 关键词：spruce ; bark beetle ; outbreak ; mass trapping ; biological control ; épicéa ; scolytides ; pullulation ; piégeage de masse ; lutte biologique
- 刊名：Annals of Forest Science
- 出版年：2008
- 出版时间：January 2008
- 年：2008
- 卷：65
- 期：3
- 页码：309
- 全文大小：166KB
- 参考文献：1. Abgrall J.F., 1987. L’utilisation de la méthode des arbres pièges avec les phéromones de synthèse dans la lutte contre le typographe. CEMAGREF, Inf. Tech. 67: 1-.
2. Abgrall J.F., Schvester D., 1987. Observation sur le piégeage de / Ips typographus L. après chablis. Rev. For. Fr. 39: 359-77. CrossRef
3. Bakke A., 1989. The recent / Ips typographius outbreak in Norway: Experiences from a control program. Hoi. Ecol. 12: 515-19.
4. Bakke A., 1991. Using pheromones in the management of bark beetle outbreaks. In: Baranchikov Y.N., Mattson W.J., Hain F.P., Payne T.L. (Eds.), Forest Insects Guild: Patterns of Interaction with Host Trees. U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report NE-153, pp. 371-77.
5. Bakke A., 1992. Monitoring bark beetle populations: effects of temperature. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 208-11. CrossRef
6. Bedard W.D., Wood D.L., Tilden P.E., 1979. Using behavior modifying chemicals to reduce western pine beetle-caused tree mortality and protect trees. In: Waters W.E. (Ed.), Current topics in forest entomology, U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report WO-8, pp. 159-63.
7. Byers J.A., 2004. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms, an overview. In: Lieutier F., Day K.R., Battisti A., Grégoire J.-C., Evans H.F. (Eds.), Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 89-34. CrossRef
8. Byers J.A., Anderbrant O., Lofqvist J., 1989. Effective attraction radius: a method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 749-65. CrossRef
9. Christiansen E. and Bakke A., 1988. The spruce bark beetle of Eurasia. In: Berryman A.A. (Ed.), Dynamics of forest insect populations: patterns, causes, implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 479-03.
10. DeMars C.J., Slaughter G.W., Bedard W.D., Norick N.X., Roettgering B., 1980. Estimating western pine beetle-caused tree mortality for evaluating an attractive pheromone treatment. J. Chem. Ecol. 6: 853-66. CrossRef
11. Dimitri L., Gebauer U., L?sekrug R., Vaupel O., 1992. Influence of mass trapping on the population dynamic and damage-effect of bark beetles. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 103-09. CrossRef
12. Drumont A., Gonzales R., de Windt N., Grégoire J.-C, de Proft M., Seutin E., 1992. Semiochemicals and the integrated management of / Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae) in Belgium. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 333-37. CrossRef
13. Faccoli M., Stergulc F., 1999. Monitoring of / Ips typographus (L.) by pheromone traps and trap-trees in Southern Italian Alps. In: Forster B., Knízek M., Grodzki W. (Eds.), Methodology in forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe, Sion-Chateauneuf, Switzerland, pp. 242-43.
14. Faccoli M., Stergulc F., 2004. / Ips typographus (L.) pheromone trapping in south Alps: spring catches determine damage thresholds. J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 307-11. CrossRef
15. Faccoli M., Stergulc F., 2006. A practical method for predicting the shorttime trend of bivoltine populations of / Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 130: 61-6. CrossRef
16. Frigimelica G., Stergulc F., Faccoli M., Battisti A., 2000. A comparison of damage caused by fungi and insects in pure and mixed stands of / Picea abies in the south-eastern Italian Alps. In: Hasenauer H. (Ed.), Forest Ecosystem Restoration. Ecological and economical impacts of restoration processes in secondary coniferous forests, Vienna, pp. 85-1.
17. Grégoire J.-C., Raty L., Drumont A., De Windt N., 1997. Pheromone mass trapping: does it protect windfalls from attack by / Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)? In: Grégoire J.-C., Liebhold A.M., Stephen F.M., Day K.R., Salom S.M. (Eds.), Integrating Cultural Tactics into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests, U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report, Radnor, PA, pp. 1-.
18. Grodzki W., Jakus R., Lajzová E., Sitková Z., Maczka T., Skvarenina J., 2006. Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle / Ips typographies (L.) (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 55-1. CrossRef
19. Guérard N., Maillard P., Bréchet C., Lieutier F., Dreyer E., 2007. Do trees use reserve or newly assimilated carbon for their defense reactions? A 13C labeling approach with young Scots pines inoculated with a bark-beetle-associated fungus ( / Ophiostoma brunneo ciliatum). Ann. For. Sci. 64: 601-08. CrossRef
20. Jakus R., 1998. A method for the protection of spruce stands against / Ips typographus by the use of barriers of pheromone traps in northeastern Slovakia. Anz. Sch?dl.kd. Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 71: 152-58. CrossRef
21. Jakus R., Blazenec M., 2003. Influence of proportion of (-) α-pinene in pheromone bait on / Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) catch in pheromone trap barriers and in single traps. J. Appl. Entomol. 127: 91-5. CrossRef
22. Lindel?w ?. Schr?eder M., 2001. Spruce bark beetle, / Ips typographus (L.), in Sweden: monitoring and risk assessment. J. For. Sci. 47: 40-2.
23. Lobinger G., Skatulla U., 1996. Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Sonnenlicht auf das Schw?rmverhalten von Borkenk?fern. Anz. Sch?dl.kd. Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 69: 183-85. CrossRef
24. Lozzia G.C., 1993. Outbreaks of / Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera Scolytidae) in spruce stands of northern Italy. Boll. Zool. Agr. Bachic. 25: 173-82.
25. Luterbacher J., Dietrich D., Xoplaki E., Grosjean M., Wanner H., 2004. European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends, and extremes since 1500 Science 303: 1499-503. CrossRef
26. Marchetti F., Salvadori C., Ambrosi P., 1999. Monitoring of bark beetle outbreaks in the spruce stands (province of Trento) and investigations on predisposing factors. In: Forster B., Knizek M., Grodzki W. (Eds.), Methodology in forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe, Sion-Chateauneuf, Switzerland, 102-07.
27. Niemeyer H., 1992. Monitoring / Ips typographus and / Pityogenes chalcographus (Col., Scolytidae) in Lower Saxony and Schleswig Holstein. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 98-02. CrossRef
28. Niemeyer H., Dimitri L., Vaupel O., 1990. Verminderung von Borkenk?ferpopulationen. Allg. Forst. Z. Waldwirtsch. Umweltvorsorge 45: 770-73.
29. Niemeyer H., Watzek G., Ackerman J., 1994. Verminderung von Stehendbefall durch Borkenk?ferfallen. Allg. Forstztg. 49: 190-92.
30. Raty L., Drumont A., De Windt N., Grégoire J.-C, 1995. Mass trapping of the spruce bark beetle / Ips typographus L.: traps or trap-trees? For. Ecol. Manage. 78: 191-05. CrossRef
31. Richter D., 1991. Control of bark beetles in the five new states of the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Wulf A., Kehr R. (Eds.), Bark Beetle Hazards Following Storm Damage: Possibilities and Limits of Integrated Control. Colloquium, Braunschweig, Germany. Communications from the Federal Biological Institute for Agriculture and Forestry, Berlin-Dahlem, No. 267, pp. 28-6.
32. Sauerwein P., 1981. Zur Frage der lockwirksamen Entfernung von Borkenkaferfallen. Mitt. Deut. Gesel. All. und Ang. Entomol. 2: 307-10.
33. Schlyter F., Zhang Q.-H., Liu G.-T., Ji L.-Z., 2001. A successful case of pheromone mass trapping of the bark beetle / Ips duplicatus in a forest island, analysed by 20 year time series data. Int. Pest Man. Rev. 6: 185-96. CrossRef
34. Schlyter F., Zhang Q.-H., Liu G.-T., Ji L.-Z., 2001. A successful case of pheromone mass trapping of the bark beetle / Ips duplicatus in a forest island, analysed by 20 year time series data. Int. Pest Man. Rev. 6: 185-96. CrossRef
35. Stergulc F., Frigimelica G., Faccoli M., Battisti A., 2000. Pest and disease damage in natural and secondary conifer stands of the Friuli -Venezia Giulia (North-eastern Italy). In: Forster B., Knizek M., Grodzki W. (Eds.), Methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe, Forest Research and Management Institute (ICAS), Busteni (Romania), pp. 167-69.
36. Vrkoc J., 1989. Use of insect pheromone in integrated pest management: examples from Czechoslovakia. Chem. Scripta 29: 407-10.
37. Warzée N., Gilbert M., Grégoire J.-C., 2006. Predator/prey ratios: a measure of bark-beetle population status influenced by stand composition in different French stands after the 1999 storms. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 301-08. CrossRef
38. Weber T., 1987. Can bark beetles be controlled efficiently by application of pheromone traps? Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 42: 87-9.
39. Wermelinger B., 2004. Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle / Ips typographus -a review of recent research. For. Ecol. Manage. 202: 67-2. CrossRef
40. Weslien J., 1992a. Effects of mass trapping on / Ips typographies (L.) populations. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 228-32. CrossRef
41. Weslien J., 1992b. Monitoring / Ips typographus (L.) populations and forecasting damage. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 338-40. CrossRef
42. Weslien J., Lindel?w ?., 1989. Trapping a local population of spruce bark beetles / Ips typographus (L.): population size and origin of trapped beetles. Hol. Ecol. 12: 511-14.
43. Wichmann L., Ravn H.P., 2001. The spread of / Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) attacks following heavy windthrow in Denmark, analysed using GIS. For. Ecol. Manage. 148: 31-9. CrossRef
44. Zar J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Press, New Jersey. - 作者单位：Massimo Faccoli (1)
Fabio Stergulc (2)
1. Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Sciences, Agripolis, Viale dell’Università, 16 - 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy
2. Department of Plant Protection, University of Udine, Italy
文摘
-The spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, is one of the main European forest pests, and mass trapping is probably the most common strategy applied to reduce its population density. However, the results concerning the effectiveness of this control system are often controversal, and many studies consider only the trapping performance with no attention to the damage reduction. -During spring-summer 2005, a control program against I. typographus outbreaks was set up in NE Italy. Twenty-four spruce forests heavily infested by I. typographus were studied: six protected by pheromone slot-traps, six by horizontal trap-logs and six by standing trap-logs; six untreated stands were kept as controls. Trap-logs were baited with a pheromone specific to I. typographus and treated with insecticide. Each type of device was tested at high, medium and low density in relation to the number of trees infested during the previous year. New damage occurring in the investigated stands was later monitored for one year. -Protected forests showed mean damage about 80% lower in 2005 than in 2004, with no statistical difference among traps, trap-logs or standing trap-logs. Instead, unprotected forests (controls) suffered damage to a similar extent in both years. Trapping devices showed no statistical differences among mean captures. Device densities showed similar results in damage reduction and insect trapping. -The results support the hypothesis that intensive trapping performed at stand level may be useful for protecting forests against I. typographus, locally reducing population density and tree mortality.