Feeding Response to Host and Nonhost Compounds by Males and Females of the Spruce Bark Beetle Ips typographus in a Tunneling Microassay

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Massimo Faccoli (1) (2)
  Miroslav Bla啪enec (1) (3)
  Fredrick Schlyter (1)
  
• 关键词：Host acceptance ; host selection ; tunneling ; feeding ; antifeedant ; nonhost volatiles ; NHV ; monoterpene ; assay ; coleoptera ; scolytidae ; AFI ; ED50 ; effective threshold
• 刊名：Journal of Chemical Ecology
• 出版年：2005
• 出版时间：April 2005
• 年：2005
• 卷：31
• 期：4
• 页码：745-759
• 全文大小：761KB
• 参考文献：1. Agelopoulos, N., Birkett, M. A., Hick, A. J., Hooper, A. M., Pickett, J. A., Pow, E. M., Smart, L. E., Smiley, D. W. M., Wadhams, L. J., Woodcock, C. M. (1999) Exploiting semiochemicals in insect control. Pestic. Sci. 55: pp. 225-235 CrossRef
  2. Ascher, K. R. S., Gurevitz, E., Renneh, S., Nemny, N. E. (1975) The penetration of females of the fruit bark beetle Scolytus mediterraneus Eggers into antifeedant-treated twigs in laboratory tests. Z. Pflanzenb. Pflanzenschutz 82: pp. 378-383
  3. Baier, P., Bader, R., and Rosner, S., 1999. Monoterpene content and monoterpene emission of Norway spruce ( / Picea abies (L.) Karst.) bark in relation to primary attraction of bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae), pp. 249鈥?59, / in F. Lieutier, W. J. Mattson, and M. R. Wagner (eds.). Physiology and Genetics of Tree Phytophagous Interactions. International Symposium, Gujan, France, 31 August鈥? September, 1997.
  4. Bedard, W. D. (1966) A ground phloem media for rearing immature bark beetles (Scolytidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59: pp. 931-938
  5. Borden, J. H. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. In: Card茅, R. T., Minks, A. K. eds. (1997) Pheromone Researche: New Directions. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 421-438
  6. Byers, J. A. Host-tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles. In: Card茅, R. T., Bell, W. J. eds. (1995) Chemical Ecology of Insects, 2. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 154-213
  7. Christiansen, E., Bakke, A. The spruce bark beetle of Eurasia. In: Berryman, A. A. eds. (1988) Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Patterns, Causes, Implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 479-503
  8. Dickens, J. C. (1981) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle Ips typographus to potential pheromone components. Physiol. Entomol. 6: pp. 251-261
  9. Doskotch, R. W., Chatterji, S. K., Peacock, J. W. (1970) Elm bark derived feeding stimulants for the smaller European elm bark beetle. Science 167: pp. 380-382
  10. Elkinton, J. S., Wood, D. L., Browne, L. E. (1981) Feeding and boring behavior of the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus, in extracts of ponderosa pine phloem. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: pp. 209-220 CrossRef
  11. Erbilgin, N., Raffa, K. F. (2000) Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetles to their aggregation pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: pp. 2527-2548 CrossRef
  12. Everaerts, C., Gr茅goire, J.-C., Merlin, J. The toxicity of Norway spruce monoterpenes to two bark beetle species and their associated. In: Mattson, W. J., Levieux, J., Dagan, C. B. eds. (1988) Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses Against Insects鈥擲earch for Pattern. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 335-344
  13. Ferkovich, S. M., Dale, M. N. (1971) Naphthoquinone inhibitors of Periplaneta americana and Scolytus multistriatus feeding: Ultraviolet difference spectra of reactions of juglone, menadione and 1,4-naphthoquinone with amino acids and the indicated mechanism of feeding inhibition. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 4: pp. 23-30
  14. Frazier, J. L., Chyb, S. Use of feeding inhibitors in insect control. In: Chapman, R. F., DeBore, G. eds. (1995) Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1-42
  15. Klepzig, K. D., Schlyter, F. (1999) Laboratory evaluation of plant derived antifeedants against European pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: pp. 644-650
  16. Levy, E. C., Ishaaya, I., Gurevitz, E., Cooper, R., Lavie, D. (1974) Isolation and identification of host compounds eliciting attraction and bite stimuli in the fruit tree bark beetle, Scolytus mediterraneus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22: pp. 376-379 CrossRef
  17. McNee, W. R., Bonello, P., Storer, A. J., Wood, D. L., Gordon, T. R. (2003) Feeding response of Ips paraconfusus to phloem and phloem metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum-inoculated ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: pp. 1183-1202
  18. Paynter, Q. E., Anderbrant, O., Schlyter, F. (1990) Behavior of male and female spruce bark beetles, Ips typographus, on the bark of host trees. J. Insect Behav. 3: pp. 529-543
  19. Raffa, K. F. Host orientation behavior of Dendroctonus ponderosae: Integration of token stimuli and host defenses. In: Mattson, W. J., Levieux, J., Bernard-Degan, C. eds. (1988) Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses Against Insects. Sringer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 369-390
  20. Raffa, K. F., Berryman, A. A. (1982) Gustatory cues in the orientation of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host trees. Can. Entomol. 114: pp. 97-104
  21. Raffa, K. F., Phillips, T. W., Salom, S. M. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. In: Schowalter, T. D., Filip, G. M. eds. (1993) Beetle鈥揚athogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. Academic Press, New York, pp. 103-120
  22. Reddemann, J., Schopf, R. (1996) The importance of monoterpenes in the aggregation of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae: Ipinae). Entomol. Gen. 21: pp. 69-80
  23. Rudinsky, J. A., Novak, V., Svihra, P. (1971) Attraction of the bark beetle Ips typographus L. to terpenes and a male produced pheromone. Z. Angew. Entomol. 67: pp. 179-188
  24. Safranyik, L., Shrimpton, D. M., Whitney, H. S. An interpretation of the interaction between lodgepole pine, the mountain pine beetle and its associated blue stain fungi in western Canada. In: Baumgartner, D. M. eds. (1975) Management of Lodgepole Pine Ecosystems. Washington St. Univ. Press, Pullman, pp. 406-428
  25. Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G. Forest beetles. In: Hardie, J., Minks, A. K. eds. (1999) Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. CAB International, Oxford, UK, pp. 113-148
  26. Schlyter, F., Cederholm, I. (1981) Separation of the sexes of living spruce bark beetles, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 92: pp. 42-47
  27. Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G., Leufv茅n, A. (1989) Inhibition of attraction to aggregation pheromone by verbenone and ipsenol. Density regulation mechanisms in bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: pp. 2263-2277
  28. 艩imsek, Z., F眉hrer, E. (1993) Kunstliches Nahr- und Brutmedium fur Ips typographus L. (Col; Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 116: pp. 432-439
  29. Smelyanets, V. P., Vasechko, G. I. (1973) The chemotaxis of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Ipidae) to terpenoids. Zool. Zhurnal 52: pp. 1089-1092
  30. Sturgeon, K. B. (1979) Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 33: pp. 803-814
  31. Thomas, H. A., Richmond, J. A., and Bradley, E. L. 1981. Bioassay of pine bark extracts as biting stimulants for the southern pine beetle. USDA Forest Service. Research Note SE-302. 5 pp.
  32. Visser, J. H. (1986) Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31: pp. 121-144
  33. Wallin, K. F., Raffa, K. F. (2000) Influences of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple steps of post-landing host acceptance behaviour of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 29: pp. 442-453
  34. Wallin, K. F., Raffa, K. F. (2002) Prior encounters modulate subsequent choices in host acceptance behavior by the bark beetle Ips pini. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 103: pp. 205-218
  35. Wood, D. L. (1982) The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: pp. 411-446
  36. Zar, J. H. (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
  37. Zhang, Q.-H., Schlyter, F. (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric. For. Entomol. 6: pp. 1-20
  38. Zhang, Q.-H., Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G. (2000) Bark volatiles from non-host angiosperm trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis. Chemoecology 10: pp. 69-80
  
• 作者单位：Massimo Faccoli (1) (2)
  Miroslav Bla啪enec (1) (3)
  Fredrick Schlyter (1)
  
  1. Chemical Ecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 44, SE-230 53, Alnarp, Sweden
  2. Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Productions鈥擡ntomology, Agripolis, Viale dell鈥橴niversit脿, 16/a IT-35020, Legnaro, Padova, Italy
  3. Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 艩t煤rova 2, SK-96053, Zvolen, Slovakia
  

文摘

Research on host selection by bark and wood boring insects has concentrated on flight orientation behavior. Less is known of the factors that govern the steps successive to host landing. Here, we discuss chemical factors involved in host acceptance by bark beetles and a new microassay. Adult males and females of Ips typographus were offered an artificial diet treated with various concentrations of different plant-derived compounds (host terpenes and nonhost compounds) in a no-choice mode. Beetles were tested individually in a glass tube for 4聽hr, and the length of feeding was measured and compared to a control (diet with only solvent). The first effect was diet rejection, especially when nonhost compounds were tested at high concentrations. Most compounds reduced feeding, in proportion to concentration. Females were fed more readily than males after addition of both host and nonhost compounds. Diet removal was significantly affected by all the tested factors (sex, compound, dose) as well as by their interactions. With increased concentrations, males were more responsive than females to antifeedants, as all compounds (except juglone) showed clear sex differences of diet consumption. 3-Octanol, 1-hexanol, and a Green Leaf Volatile (GLV)-blend (three C6 alcohols) showed the strongest antifeedant effects, which started at a low dose (0.1%) and had a low Effective Dose 50 (ED50, 0.3鈥?%). In contrast, host monoterpenes, limonene and 伪-pinene, inhibited feeding at high doses (10鈥?0%) only with ED50 > 10%. The highest Antifeedant Indexes (AFIs) were shown by verbenone, carvone, and 1-hexanol (0.90鈥?.00). Both host and nonhost compounds inhibited feeding at some concentration. No significant stimulation of feeding by any host compound at concentrations reported in the literature as optimal were found, with the possible exception of 伪-pinene at low concentrations in females.