Pre and post-operative evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility in neurologically impaired children using combined pH–multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Suguru Fukahori (1)
Kimio Asagiri (1)
Shinji Ishii (1)
Yoshiaki Tanaka (1)
Shin-ichiro Kojima (1)
Nobuyuki Saikusa (1)
Yoshinori Koga (1)
Motomu Yoshida (1)
Daisuke Masui (1)
Naoko Komatsuzaki (1)
Yoshitaka Seki (2)
Minoru Yagi (1) - 关键词：Multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Neurologically impaired ; Esophageal motility ; Dry swallow
- 刊名：Pediatric Surgery International
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：June 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：29
- 期：6
- 页码：545-551
- 全文大小：321KB
- 参考文献：1. Ceriati E, De Peppo F, Ciprandi G, Marchetti P, Silveri M, Rivosecchi M (2006) Surgery in disabled children: general gastroenterological aspects. Acta Paediatr Suppl 95:34-7 CrossRef
2. Mittal RK, Holloway RH, Penagini R, Blackshaw LA, Dent J (1995) Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology 109:601-10 CrossRef
3. Zangen T, Ciarla C, Zangen S, Di Lorenzo C, Flores AF, Cocjin J, Reddy SN, Rowhani A, Schwankovsky L, Hyman PE (2003) Gastrointestinal motility and sensory abnormalities may contribute to food refusal in medically fragile toddlers. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 37:287-93 CrossRef
4. Vandenplas Y, Salvatore S, Hauser B (2005) The diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants. Early Hum Dev 81:1011-024 CrossRef
5. Okada T, Sasaki F, Asaka M, Kato M, Nakagawa M, Todo S (2005) Delay of gastric emptying measured by 13C-acetate breath test in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux. Eur J Pediatr Surg 15:77-1 CrossRef
6. Sullivan PB (2008) Gastrointestinal disorders in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Dev Disabil Res Rev 14:128-36 CrossRef
7. Del Buono R, Wenzl TG, Rawat D, Thomson M (2006) Acid and nonacid gastro-oesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired children: investigation with the multiple intraluminal impedance procedure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 43:331-35 CrossRef
8. Goessler A, Huber-Zeyringer A, Hoellwarth ME (2006) Does epilepsy influence the outcome of anti-reflux procedures in neurologically impaired children? Pediatr Surg Int 22:485-90 CrossRef
9. Rothenberg SS (1998) Experience with 220 consecutive laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 33:274-78 CrossRef
10. Martinez DA, Ginn-Pease ME, Caniano DA (1992) Sequelae of anti-reflux surgery in profoundly disabled children. J Pediatr Surg 27:267-71 (discussion 271-63) CrossRef
11. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, Castell DO (1987) Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal-contractions. Dig Dis Sci 32:583-92 CrossRef
12. Conchillo JM, Smout AJ (2009) Review article: intra-oesophageal impedance monitoring for the assessment of bolus transit and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29:3-4 CrossRef
13. Frieling T, Hermann S, Kuhlbusch R, Enck P, Silny J, Lübke HJ, Strohmeyer G, Haeussinger D (1996) Comparison between intraluminal multiple electric impedance measurement and manometry in the human oesophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 8:45-0 CrossRef
14. Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M, Wise J, Balaji N, Zhang X, Adhami T, Murray J, Peters J, Castell D (2004) Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1037-043 CrossRef
15. Fonkalsrud EW, Ashcraft KW, Coran AG, Ellis DG, Grosfeld JL, Tunell WP, Weber TR (1998) Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children: a combined hospital study of 7,467 patients. Pediatrics 101:419-22 CrossRef
16. Conchillo JM, Schwartz MP, Selimah M, Samsom M, Sifrim D, Smout AJ (2008) Acid and non-acid reflux patterns in patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease NERD: a study using intraluminal impedance monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 53:1506-512 CrossRef
17. Peter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF (2002) Influence of nasogastric tubes on gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a multiple intraluminal impedance study. J Pediatr 141:277-79 CrossRef
18. Di Pace MR, Caruso AM, Catalano P, Casuccio A, De Grazia E (2011) Evaluation of esophageal motility using multichannel intraluminal impedance in healthy children and children with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 52:26-0 CrossRef
19. Yigit T, Quiroga E, Oelschlager B (2006) Multichannel intraluminal impedance for the assessment of post-fundoplication dysphagia. Dis Esophagus 19:382-88 CrossRef - 作者单位：Suguru Fukahori (1)
Kimio Asagiri (1)
Shinji Ishii (1)
Yoshiaki Tanaka (1)
Shin-ichiro Kojima (1)
Nobuyuki Saikusa (1)
Yoshinori Koga (1)
Motomu Yoshida (1)
Daisuke Masui (1)
Naoko Komatsuzaki (1)
Yoshitaka Seki (2)
Minoru Yagi (1)
1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
2. Department of Pediatrics, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan - ISSN：1437-9813
文摘
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with neurological impairment (NI) has not been fully studied before and after fundoplication procedure because their characteristics such as generalized gastrointestinal dysmotility, non-acid reflux, and the proximal reflux due to feeding of enteral nutrition via a nasogastric tube prevent their GERD from being detected by 24?h pH monitoring. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether multichannel impedance–pH measurement (pH/MII) is able to detect the subtypes of GERD and the differences in the reflux episodes of the severity of GERD, the ingestion pathway, and before and after fundoplication. The second aim was to determine whether a trial evaluation of dry swallows was able to be used to assess the esophageal motility of NI patients as an alternative examination. Patients and methods The 24?h pH/MII was conducted on 20 NI children [15 were the patients before Nissen’s fundoplication (BN), of whom, six were fed orally (FO) and nine were fed via nasogastric tube (NGT), and five were the patients after Nissen’s fundoplication (AN)]. All reflux episodes were evaluated and compared between patients with pathological GERD (PG) and non-pathological GERD (NG) and between patients who had FO and NGT and patients between BN and AN. Dry swallows were conducted to evaluate the esophageal motility. The average bolus presence time (BPT) and total bolus transit time (TBTT) were compared between the PG and NG, FO and NGT, and the BN and AN subgroups. Results A total of 1,064 reflux episodes were detected by pH/MII. Of those, 303 (28.5?%) were non-acid-related and 477 episodes reached the proximal esophagus. Of the 12 patients (57.1?%) showing pathological GERD, two cases (16.7?%) demonstrated predominantly weakly acidic PG. More than half of the reflux episodes of PG patients reached to the proximal esophagus. The numbers of total reflux and proximal reflux episodes in the PG were significantly higher than those in NG patients. The number of proximal reflux episodes in the FO group was significantly higher than that in the NGT groups, whereas NGT patients showed more non-acidic reflux episodes than FO patients. A trial evaluation of dry swallows demonstrated no significant differences in this study. Conclusion The pH/MII was useful to detect the subtype of GERD in NI patients which could not be detected by 24?h pH monitoring. It can, therefore, be considered to have first priority for testing NI patients who are suspected to be suffering from GERD.