Prozessverbesserung mit Reifegradmodellen
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Dr. Maximilian R?glinger (1)
    Dr. Nora Kamprath (1)
  • 关键词:Kontinuierliche Prozessverbesserung ; Optimierungsmodell ; Prozessmanagement ; Reifegradmodell ; Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung ; Continuous process improvement ; Optimization model ; Business process management ; Maturity model ; Value ; based management ; C60 ; L21 ; L80
  • 刊名:Journal of Business Economics
  • 出版年:2012
  • 出版时间:May 2012
  • 年:2012
  • 卷:82
  • 期:5
  • 页码:509-538
  • 全文大小:556KB
  • 参考文献:1. Albach H (2001) Shareholder Value und Unternehmenswert -Theoretische Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen Thema. Z Betriebswirtschaft 71(6):643-74
    2. Ashrafi N (2003) The impact of software process improvement on quality: in theory and practice. Inf Manag 40(7):677-90 CrossRef
    3. Balzert H (1998) Lehrbuch der Software-Technik. Software-Management, Software-Qualit?tssicherung, Unternehmensmodellierung. Spektrum, Heidelberg
    4. Bamberg G, Dorfleitner G, Krapp M (2004) Zur Bewertung risikobehafteter Zahlungsstr?me mit intertemporaler Abh?ngigkeitsstruktur. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forsch Prax 56(2):101-18
    5. Bamberg G, Dorfleitner G, Krapp M (2006) Unternehmensbewertung unter Unsicherheit: Zur entscheidungstheoretischen Fundierung der Risikoanalyse. Z Betriebswirtschaft 76(3):287-07 CrossRef
    6. Baur A, Merten T, L?rcher M (2005) Handlungsanleitung zur Entwicklung der Prozessreife in prozessorientierten Unternehmen. WEKA MEDIA, Kissing
    7. Becker J, Knackstedt R, P?ppelbu? J (2009) Entwicklung von Reifegradmodellen für das IT-Management: Vorgehensmodell und praktische Anwendung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 51(3):249-60 CrossRef
    8. Becker J, Niehaves B, P?ppelbu? J, Simons A (2010) Maturity models in IS research. In: Johnson R, De Villiers C (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems, Pretoria
    9. Benbasat I, Dexter A, Drury D, Goldstein R (1984) A critique of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Commun ACM 27(5):466-75 CrossRef
    10. Bernecker M, Eckrich K (2003) Handbuch Projektmanagement. Oldenbourg, München CrossRef
    11. Boehm BW, Abts C, Windsor Brown A, Chulani S, Clark BK, Horowitz E, Madachy R, Reifer D, Steece B (2000) Software cost estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River
    12. BPM&O Architects (2010) Umfrage Status Quo Prozessmanagement 2009/2010.http://www.bpmo.de/bpmo/export/sites/default/de/know_how/downloads/Status_Quo_Prozessmanagement_2009-2010.pdf. Zugegriffen: 3. Juli 2011
    13. Buhl HU, R?glinger M, St?ckl S, Braunwarth K (2011) Wertorientierung im Prozessmanagement -Forschungslücke und Beitrag zu betriebswirtschaftlich fundierten Prozessmanagement-Entscheidungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 53(3):163-72
    14. Burnstein I, Suwanassart T, Carlson CR (1996) Developing a testing maturity model for software test processevaluation and improvement. Proceedings of the 9th International Quality Week Conference, San Francisco, S?581-89
    15. Capgemini (2006) Trends in der Versicherungswirtschaft -Industrialisierung nimmt Gestalt an.http://origin.at.capgemini.com/m/at/tl/Trends_in_der_Versicherungswirtschaft.pdf. Zugegriffen: 26. April 2011
    16. Coenenberg AG, Salfeld R (2007) Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung: Vom Strategieentwurf zur Implementierung, 2.?Aufl. Sch?ffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
    17. Coenenberg AG, Schultze W (2002) Unternehmensbewertung: Konzeptionen und Perspektiven. Betriebswirtschaft 62(6):597-21
    18. Coenenberg AG, Mattner GR, Schultze W (2003) Wertorientierte Steuerung: Anforderungen, Konzepte, Anwendungsprobleme. In: Rathgeber A, Tebroke H, Wallmeier M (Hrsg) Finanzwirtschaft, Kapitalmarkt und Banken. Sch?ffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, S?1-4
    19. Copeland TE, Koller T, Murrin J (1990) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley, New York
    20. Covey R, Hixon D (2005) The creation and use of an analysis capability maturity model.http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA436426. Zugegriffen: 17. Juli 2010
    21. Crawford JK (2006) The project management maturity model. Inf Syst Manag 23(4):50-8 CrossRef
    22. Danielson MG, Heck JL, Shaffer DR (2008) Shareholder theory -how opponents and proponents both get it wrong. J App Financ 18(2):62-6
    23. de Bruin T, Rosemann M (2007) Using the delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. Proceedings of the 18th Australiasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Toowoomba
    24. de Bruin T, Freeze R, Kulkarni U, Rosemann M (2005) Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney
    25. Diekmann A (2009) Empirische Sozialforschung, 20.?Aufl. rororo, Hamburg
    26. Drukarczyk J (1997) Wertorientierte Unternehmenssteuerung. Besprechung des Shareholder-Value-Ansatzes von Rappaport. Z Bankr Bankwirtsch 9(3):217-26
    27. Fandel G, Fey A, Heuft B, Pitz T (2007) Kostenrechnung, 2.?Aufl., Springer, Berlin
    28. Fiedler FE (1964) A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1:149-90 CrossRef
    29. Foegen, M, Battenfeld, J, Raak, C (2007) CMMI-ein Werkzeug zur Prozessverbesserung.http://www.computerwoche.de/management/it-strategie/590892. Zugegriffen: 19. M?rz 2010
    30. Fraser P, Moultrie J, Gregory M (2002) The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Cambridge, S?244-49
    31. Gartner (2010) Leading in times of transition: the 2010 CIO agenda.http://drishtikone.com/files/2010CIOAgenda_ExecSummary.pdf. Zugegriffen: 4. Juni 2010
    32. Gneiser M (2010) Value-based CRM -the interaction of the triad of marketing, financial management, and it. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(2):95-03 CrossRef
    33. Gossen HH (1854) Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus flie?enden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Vieweg, Braunschweig
    34. Gottschalk P (2009) Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Gov Inf Q 26(1):75-1 CrossRef
    35. Greb T, Kneuper R (2010) Unternehmenszielorientierte Prozessverbesserung mit CMMI. HMD -Prax Wirtschaftsinformatik 47(273):97-05
    36. Hammer M (2007) Der gro?e Prozess-Check. Harv Bus Manag 29(5):35-2
    37. Hammer M (2010) What is business process management? In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (Hrsg) Handbook on business process management 1. Introduction, methods, and information systems. Springer, Heidelberg, S?3-6
    38. Harmon, P (2009) Process Maturity Models.http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/spotlight_051909.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. Juli 2011
    39. Heidemann J, Kamprath N, Müller A (2011) Die Integration des Kunden in Gesch?ftsprozesse -ein ?konomisches Modell und dessen Anwendung am Beispiel eines Versicherungsunternehmens. In: Bernstein A, Schwabe G (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Zürich, S?119-28
    40. Hood C, Wiebel R (2009) Optimieren von requirements management & engineering mit dem HOOD Capability Model. Springer, Berlin
    41. H?rmann K, Dittmann L, Hindel B, Müller M (2006) SPICE in der Praxis. dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg
    42. Huang S, Han W (2006) Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation. Inf Manag 43(3):297-07 CrossRef
    43. IT Governance Institute (2009) CobIT 4.0 -Deutsche Ausgabe.http://www.isaca.ch/files/DO5_COBIT/CobiT%204.0%20Deutsch.pdf. Zugegriffen: 4. Juni 2010
    44. Iversen J, Nielsen PA, Norbjerg J (1999) Situated assessment of problems in software development. DATA BASE Adv Inf Syst 30(2):66-1 CrossRef
    45. Jiang J, Klein G, Hwang H, Huang J, Hung S (2004) An exploration of the relationship between software development maturity and project performance. Inf Manag 31(3):279-88 CrossRef
    46. Kamprath N, R?glinger M (2011) ?konomische Planung von Prozessverbesserungsma?nahmen -Ein modelltheoretischer Ansatz auf Grundlage CMMI-basierter Prozessreifegradmodelle. In: Bernstein A, Schwabe G (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Zürich, S?109-18
    47. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
    48. Kazanjian K, Drazin R (1989) An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Manag Sci 35(12):1489-503 CrossRef
    49. King JL, Kraemer KL (1984) Evolution and organizational information systems: an assessment of Nolan’s stage model. Commun ACM 27(5):466-75 CrossRef
    50. Klein R, Scholl A (2004) Planung und Entscheidung. Vahlen, München
    51. Kneuper R (2005) CMMI zur Lieferantenauswahl -Bewertung von Assessmentergebnissen. HMD -Prax Wirtsch 42(246):93-03
    52. Kulkarni U, Freeze R (2004) Development and validation of a knowledge management capability assessment model. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems. Washington, S?657-70
    53. Macharzina K, Neubürger H (2002) Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung. 55. Deutscher Betriebswirtschafter-Tag. Sch?ffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
    54. Mathiassen L, Sorensen C (1996) The capability maturity model and CASE. Inf Syst J 6(3):195-08 CrossRef
    55. McKinsey (2008) Global survey results. IT’s unmet potential. McKinsey Q 17(4):1-
    56. Mertens P (1996) Process focus considered harmful? Wirtschaftsinformatik 38(4):446-47
    57. Mettler T (2011) Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach. Int J Soc Syst Sci 3(1/2):81-8 CrossRef
    58. Mettler T, Rohner P (2009) Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. In: Vaishnavi V, Purao S (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Philadelphia
    59. Mettler T, Rohner P, Winter R (2010) Towards a classification of maturity models in information systems. In: D’Atri A, De Marco M, Braccini AM, Cabiddu F (Hrsg) Management of the Interconnected World. Springer, S?333-40
    60. Mithas S, Ramasubba N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Q 35(1):237-56
    61. Nolan R (1973) Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Commun ACM 16(7):399-05 CrossRef
    62. Object Management Group (2007) Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM), Beta 1.http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/2007-07-02. Zugegriffen: 19. M?rz 2010
    63. Paulk MC, Curtis B, Chrissis MB, Weber CV (1993) Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Softw 10(4):18-7 CrossRef
    64. Perridon L, Steiner M, Rathgeber A (2009) Finanzwirtschaft der Unternehmung, 15.?Aufl. Vahlen, München
    65. P?ppelbu? J, R?glinger M (2011) What makes a useful maturity model? A framework for general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki
    66. Prananto A, McKay J, Marshall P (2003) A study of the progression of e-business maturity in Australian SMEs: some evidence of the applicability of the stages of growth for e-business model. Proceedings of the PACIS, Adelaide, S?68-0
    67. Purvis R, Santiago J, Sambamurthy V (1998) An analysis of excluded IS processes in the capability maturity model and their potential impact. J End User Comput 10(1):20-9
    68. Ramasubba N, Mithas S, Kemerer C (2008) Work dispersion, process-based learning, and offshore software development performance. MIS Q 32(2):437-58
    69. Rappaport A (1986) Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. Free Press, New York
    70. Raschke RL, Ingraham LR (2010) Business process maturity’s effect on performance. Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima
    71. Renken J (2004) Developing an IS/ICT management capability maturity framework. In: South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 2004 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries. South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Republic of South Africa, S?53-2
    72. Rieger W (1928) Einführung in die Privatwirtschaftslehre. Krische, Nürnberg
    73. Rohloff M (2009) Case Study and Maturity Model for Business Process Management Implementation. Business Process Management LNCS 5701128-42
    74. Rosemann M, de Bruin T (2005) Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Bartmann D, Rajola F, Kallinikos J, Avison D, Winter R, Ein-Dor P, Becker J, Bodendorf F, Weinhardt C (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 13th European conference on information systems. Regensburg, S?521-32
    75. Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2010) The six core elements of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (Hrsg) Handbook on business process management 1. Springer, Berlin, S?107-22 CrossRef
    76. Schmelzer HJ, Sesselmann W (2008) Gesch?ftsprozessmanagement in der Praxis, 6.?Aufl. Hanser, München
    77. Schultze W, Hirsch C (2005) Unternehmenswertsteigerung durch wertorientiertes Controlling. Vahlen, München
    78. Scott JE (2007) Mobility, business process management, software sourcing, and maturity model trends: propositions for the IS organization of the future. Inf Syst Manag 24(2):139-45 CrossRef
    79. Software Engineering Institute (2009a) CMMI for services, Version 1.2.http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/09tr001.pdf. Zugegriffen: 4. Juni 2009
    80. Software Engineering Institute (2006) CMMI for development, Version 1.2.http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/tools/dev. Zugegriffen: 1. M?rz 2010
    81. Software Engineering Institute (2007) CMMI for acquisition, Version 1.2.http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/07tr017.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. M?rz 2010
    82. Software Engineering Institute (2009b) People CMM, Version 2.0.http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/09tr003.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1 M?rz 2010
    83. Steiner M, Bruns C (2007) Wertpapiermanagement, 9.?Aufl., Sch?ffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
    84. Stewart GB, Stern JM (1991) The quest for value: the EVA management guide, 27.?Aufl. HarperBusiness, New York
    85. Stutz M, Aier S (2008) Vorgehensmodell zur fachlichen Bewertung serviceorientierter Architekturen. In: Bichler M, Hess T, Krcmar H, Lechner U, Matthes F, Picot A (Hrsg) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. GITO, Berlin, S?989-99
    86. Tat Sze C, Müller M (2009) Reifegradmodell verbindet Prozesse mit Gesch?ftszielen. Qual Zuverl?ssigk 54(1):21-5
    87. van de Ven A, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):510-40
    88. van Steenbergen M, Bos R, Brinkkemper S, van de Weerd I, Bekkers W (2010) The design of focus area maturity models. In: Winter R, Zhao L, Aier S (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology. Springer, Heidelberg, S?317-32
    89. Varian HR (2007) Grundzüge der Mikro?konomik, 7.?Aufl. Oldenbourg, München
    90. Visconti M, Cook C (1993) Software system documentation process maturity model. Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on computer science. ACM, New York, S?352-57
    91. Vitharana P, Mone M (2008) Measuring critical factors of software quality management: development and validaton of an instrument. Inf Resour Manag J 21(2):18-7 CrossRef
    92. vom Brocke J, Sonnenberg C, Simons A (2009) Wertorientiertes Prozessmanagement: State-of-the-Art und zukünftiger Forschungsbedarf. In: Hansen HR, Karagiannis D, Fill HG (Hrsg) Business Services: Konzepte, Technologien, Anwendungen. Proceedings der 9. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik. ?sterreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Wien, S?253-62
    93. vom Brocke J, Becker J, Braccini AM, Butleris R, Hofreiter B, Kapo?ius K, De Marco M, Schmidt G, Seidel S, Simons A, Skopal T, Stein A, Stieglitz S, Suomi R, Vossen G, Winter R, Wrycza S (2011) Current and future issues in BPM research: a European perspective from the ERCIS meeting 2010. Communications of the AIS 28(1):393-14
    94. Wade M, Hulland J (2004) The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Q 28(1):107-42
    95. Wagner KW, Dürr W (2008) Reifegrad nach ISO/IEC 15504 (SPICE) umsetzen. Carl Hanser, München
    96. Wilde T, Hess T (2007) Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik -Eine empirische Untersuchung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 49(4):280-87 CrossRef
    97. Wolf C, Harmon P (2010) The state of business process management 2010.http://www.bptrends.com/members_surveys/deliver.cfm?report_id=1004&target=2009%20BPTrends%20State%20of%20Market%20Rept%20-FINAL%20PDF%20CAP%202-1-10.pdf&return=surveys_landing.cfm. Zugegriffen: 22. Juli 2011
    98. Zwicker J, Fettke P, Loos P (2010) Business process maturity in public administration. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (Hrsg) Handbook on business process management 2. Springer, Heidelberg, S?369-00 CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Dr. Maximilian R?glinger (1)
    Dr. Nora Kamprath (1)

    1. FIM Kernkompetenzzentrum Finanz- & Informationsmanagement, Universit?t Augsburg, Universit?tsstra?e 12, 86159, Augsburg, Deutschland
文摘
Since the Software Engineering Institute has published the Capability Maturity Model in 1991, maturity models evolved into a commonly used instrument for assessing the state of a specific class of objects and for identifying improvement measures. As process improvement is a core task of business process management and takes top positions on CIO agendas, maturity models are prospering in this domain as well. However, it remains unclear which maturity levels should be aspired for distinct processes or process groups. Numerous companies strive for increasing or even maximizing maturity levels. Some maturity model specifications contain oppositional advice, but lack concrete recommendations. Even academia provides no answers. Against this background, we propose a mathematical optimization model that builds on insights from value-based management in order to analyze general economic relationships of process improvement with maturity models. The guiding effects of these relationships are illustrated using the example of “CMMI for Services- We conclude by discussing limitations and by pointing out theoretical as well as managerial implications.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700