Co-occurrence patterns of above-ground and below-ground mite communities in farmland of Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Lin Lin (1)
  Meixiang Gao (1) (2)
  Dong Liu (2)
  Xueping Zhang (1)
  Haitao Wu (2)
  Donghui Wu (2)
  
• 关键词：above ; ground mite ; below ; ground mite ; mite communities ; co ; occurrence patterns ; interspecific competition ; species pair associations
• 刊名：Chinese Geographical Science
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：June 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：24
• 期：3
• 页码：339-347
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Adams D C, 2007. Organization of Plethodon salamander communities: Guild-based community assembly. / Ecology, 88(5): 1292鈥?299. doi: 10.1890/06-0697 CrossRef
  2. Albrecht M, Gotelli N J, 2001. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. / Oecologia, 126(1): 134鈥?41. doi: 10.1007/s004420000494 CrossRef
  3. Balogh J, Balogh P, 1992. / The Oribatid Mites Genera of the World ( / Vol. 1 and 2). Budapest: The Hungarian National Museum Press, 263, 371.
  4. Bardgett R D, Wardle D A, 2010. / Aboveground-belowground Linkages: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Processes, and Global Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1鈥?87.
  5. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. / The Annals of Statistics, 29(4): 1165鈥?188. doi: 10.2307/2674075 CrossRef
  6. Caruso T, Taormina M, Migliorini M, 2012. Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: A spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. / Journal of Animal Ecology, 81(1): 214鈥?21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01886.x CrossRef
  7. Caruso T, Trokhymets V, Bargagli R / et al., 2013. Biotic interactions as a structuring force in soil communities: Evidence from the micro-arthropods of an Antarctic moss model system. / Oecologia, 172(2): 495鈥?03. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2503-9 CrossRef
  8. Chave J, 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. / Ecology Letters, 7(3): 241鈥?53. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00566.x CrossRef
  9. Connor E F, Simberloff D, 1979. The assembly of species communities: Chance or competition? / Ecology, 60(6): 1132鈥?140. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.01.007 CrossRef
  10. Deca毛ns T, Margerie P, Aubert M / et al., 2008. Assembly rules within earthworm communities in north-western France鈥擜 regional analysis. / Applied Soil Ecology, 39(3): 321鈥?35. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.01.007 CrossRef
  11. Deyna G B D, Putten W H V, 2005. Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. / Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(11): 625鈥?33. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.009 CrossRef
  12. Diamond J M, 1975. / Assembly of Species Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 342鈥?44.
  13. Ehouman N M, Tiho S, Dagnogo M, 2012. Co-occurrence of earthworms in Lamto savanna: A null model analysis of community structure. / European Journal of Soil Biology, 53(11鈥?2): 40鈥?7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.08.007 CrossRef
  14. Ellwood M D F, Manica A, Foster W A, 2009. Stochastic and deterministic processes jointly structure tropical arthropod communities. / Ecology Letters, 12(4): 277鈥?84. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01284.x CrossRef
  15. Escoriza D, Boix D, 2012. Assessing the potential impact of an invasive species on a Mediterranean amphibian assemblage: A morphological and ecological approach. / Hydrobiologia, 680(1): 233鈥?45. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0936-5 CrossRef
  16. Ettema C H, Yeates G W, 2003. Nested spatial biodiversity patterns of nematode genera in a New Zealand forest and pasture soil. / Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(2): 339鈥?42. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00276-6 CrossRef
  17. Fayle T M, Manica A, 2010. Reducing over-reporting of deterministic co-occurrence patterns in biotic communities. / Ecological Modelling, 221(19): 2237鈥?242. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.013 CrossRef
  18. Feeley K, 2003. Analysis of avian communities in Lake Guri, Venezuela, using multiple assembly rule models. / Oecologia, 137(1): 104鈥?13. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1321-5 CrossRef
  19. Fiera C, Ulrich W, 2012. Spatial patterns in the distribution of European springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola). / Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 105(3): 498鈥?06. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01816.x CrossRef
  20. Fox B J, Brown J H, 1993. Assembly rules for functional groups in north American desert rodent communities. / Oikos, 67(2): 358鈥?70. CrossRef
  21. Gotelli N J, 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. / Ecology, 81(9): 2606鈥?621. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081 CrossRef
  22. Gotelli N J, 2002. Research frontiers in null model analysis. / Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10(4): 337鈥?43. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00249.x CrossRef
  23. Gotelli N J, Ellison A M, 2002. Assembly rules for New England ant assemblages. / Oikos, 99(3): 591鈥?99. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11734.x CrossRef
  24. Gotelli N J, Entsminger G L, 2009. Ecosim: Null models software for ecology (version 7). Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear: Jericho, VT, USA. Available at: http:/garyentsminger.com/ecosim.htm.
  25. Gotelli N J, Graves G R, 1996. / Null Models in Ecology. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1鈥?68.
  26. Gotelli N J, McCabe D J, 2002. Species co-occurrence: A meta-analysis of J M Diamond鈥檚 assembly rules model. / Ecology, 83(8): 2091鈥?096. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083 CrossRef
  27. Gotelli N J, Rohde K, 2002. Co-occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: A null model analysis. / Ecology Letters, 5(1): 86鈥?4. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00288.x CrossRef
  28. Gotelli N J, Ulrich W, 2010. The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations. / Oecologia, 162(2): 463鈥?77. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1474-y CrossRef
  29. Gotelli N J, Ulrich W, 2012. Statistical challenges in null model analysis. / Oikos, 121(2): 171鈥?80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20301.x CrossRef
  30. Graves G R, Gotelli N J, 1993. Assembly of avian mixed-species flocks in Amazonia. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90(4): 1388鈥?391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1388 CrossRef
  31. Guti茅rrez-L贸pez M, Jes煤s J B, Trigo D / et al., 2010. Relationships among spatial distribution of soil microarthropods, earthworm species and soil properties. / Pedobiologia, 53(6): 381鈥?89. doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2010.07.003 CrossRef
  32. Hanski I, 1982. Communities of bumblebees: Testing the core-satellite species hypothesis. / Annales Zoologici Fennici, 19: 65鈥?3.
  33. Haukisalmi V, Henttonen H, 1998. Analysing interspecific associations in parasites: Alternative methods and effects of sampling heterogeneity. / Oecologia, 116(4): 565鈥?74. doi: 10.1007/s004420050622 CrossRef
  34. Ingimarsd贸ttir M, Caruso T, Ripa J / et al., 2012. Primary assembly of soil communities: Disentangling the effect of dispersal and local environment. / Oecologia, 170(3): 745鈥?54. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2334-8 CrossRef
  35. Jim茅nez J J, Deca毛ns T, Rossi J P, 2012. Soil environmental heterogeneity allows spatial co-occurrence of competitor earthworm species in a gallery forest of the Colombian鈥?Llanos鈥? / Oikos, 121(6): 915鈥?26 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20428.x CrossRef
  36. Jim茅nez J J, Rossi J P, 2006. Spatial dissociation between two endogeic earthworms in the Colombian 鈥楲lanos鈥? / European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(S1): S218鈥揝224 doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.032 CrossRef
  37. Jim茅nez J J, Rossi J P, Lavelle P, 2001. Spatial distribution of earthworms in acid-soil savannas of the eastern plains of Colombia. / Applied Soil Ecology, 17(3): 267鈥?78. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00133-0 CrossRef
  38. Krantz G W, 1978. / A manual of Acarology. Corvallis: Oregon State University Book Stores Inc., 1鈥?09.
  39. Krantz G W, Walter D E, 2009. / A Manual of Acarology ( / Third edition). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press, 1鈥?07.
  40. Krasnov B R, Shenbrot G I, Khokhlova I S, 2011. Aggregative structure is the rule in communities of fleas: Null model analysis. / Ecography, 34(5): 751鈥?61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06597.x CrossRef
  41. Leibold M A, Mikkelson G M, 2002. Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: Elements of meta-community structure. / Oikos, 97(2): 237鈥?50. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970210.x CrossRef
  42. Lindo Z, Winchester N N, 2009. Spatial and environmental factors contributing to patterns in arboreal and terrestrial oribatid mite diversity across spatial scales. / Oecologia, 160(4): 817鈥?25. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1348-3 CrossRef
  43. Patterson B D, Atmar W, 1986. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. / Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28(1鈥?): 65鈥?2. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1986.tb01749.x CrossRef
  44. Pitta E, Giokas S, Sfenthourakis S, 2012. Significant pairwise co-occurrence patterns are not the rule in the majority of biotic communities. / Diversity, 4(2): 179鈥?93. doi: 10.3390/d4020179 CrossRef
  45. Pitzalis M, Luiselli L, Bologna M A, 2010. Co-occurrence analyses show that non-random community structure is disrupted by fire in two groups of soil arthropods (Isopoda Oniscidea and Collembola). / Acta Oecologica, 36(1): 100鈥?06. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00133-0 CrossRef
  46. Rossi J P, Nuutinen V, 2004. The effect of sampling unit size on the perception of the spatial pattern of earthworm ( / Lumbricus terrestris L.) middens. / Applied Soil Ecology, 27(2): 189鈥?96. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.03.001 CrossRef
  47. Sanders N J, Gotelli N J, Wittman S E / et al., 2007. Assembly rules of ground-foraging ant assemblages are contingent on disturbance, habitat and spatial scale. / Journal of Biogeography, 34(9): 1632鈥?641. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01714.x CrossRef
  48. Schluter D, 1984. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. / Ecology, 65(3): 998鈥?005. doi: 10.2307/1938071 CrossRef
  49. Sfenthourakis S, Tzanatos E, Giokas S / et al., 2006. Species co-occurrence: The case of congeneric species and a causal approach to patterns of species association. / Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(1): 39鈥?9. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00192.x CrossRef
  50. Stone L, Roberts A, 1990. The checkerboard score and species distribution. / Oecologia, 85(1): 74鈥?9. doi: 10.1007/BF00317345 CrossRef
  51. Ulrich W, 2004. Species co-occurrences and neutral models: Reassessing J M Diamond鈥檚 assembly rules. / Oikos, 107(3): 603鈥?09. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12981.x CrossRef
  52. Ulrich W, 2008. Pairs-a FORTRAN program for studying pair-wise species associations in ecological matrices (Version 1.0). Available at: www.uni.torun.pl/~ulrichw.
  53. Ulrich W, Gotelli N J, 2007. Disentangling community patterns of nestedness and species co-occurrence. / Oikos, 116(12): 2053鈥?061. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16173.x CrossRef
  54. Veech J A, 2006. A probability-based analysis of temporal and spatial co-occurrence in grassland birds. / Journal of Biogeography, 33(12): 2145鈥?153. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01571.x CrossRef
  55. Walter D E, Proctor H C, 2001. / Mites in Soil ( / CD-ROM). Collingswood: CSIRO Publishing.
  56. Ward D, Beggs J, 2007. Coexistence, habitat patterns and the assembly of ant communities in the Yasawa islands, Fiji. / Acta Oecologica, 32(2): 215鈥?23. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.05.002 CrossRef
  57. Wardle D A, Bardgett R D, Klironomos J N / et al., 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. / Science, 304(5677): 1629鈥?633. doi: 10.1126/science.1094875 CrossRef
  58. Wilson J B, Whittaker R J, 1995. Assembly rules demonstrated in saltmarsh community. / Journal of Ecology, 83(5): 801鈥?07. CrossRef
  59. Yin Wenying, Hu Shenghao, Shen Yunfen / et al., 1998. / Pictorical Keys to Soil Animals of China. Beijing: Science Press, 527鈥?62. (in Chinese)
  
• 作者单位：Lin Lin (1)
  Meixiang Gao (1) (2)
  Dong Liu (2)
  Xueping Zhang (1)
  Haitao Wu (2)
  Donghui Wu (2)
  
  1. Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Monitoring of Geographic Environment, College of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China
  2. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
  
• ISSN：1993-064X

文摘

One of the fundamental questions in community ecology is whether communities are random or formed by deterministic mechanisms. Although many efforts have been made to verify non-randomness in community structure, little is known with regard to co-occurrence patterns in above-ground and below-ground communities. In this paper, we used a null model to test non-randomness in the structure of the above-ground and below-ground mite communities in farmland of the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Then, we used four tests for non-randomness to recognize species pairs that would be demonstrated as significantly aggregated or segregated co-occurrences of the above-ground and below-ground mite communities. The co-occurrence pattern of the above-ground mite community was significantly non-random in October, suggesting species segregation and hence interspecific competition. Additionally, species co-occurrence patterns did not differ from randomness in the above-ground mite community in August or in below-ground mite communities in August and October. Only one significant species pair was detected in the above-ground mite community in August, while no significant species pairs were recognized in the above-ground mite community in October or in the below-ground mite communities in August and October. The results indicate that non-randomness and significant species pairs may not be the general rule in the above-ground and below-ground mite communities in farmland of the Sanjiang Plain at the fine scale.